Pharmacokinetics and preliminary safety data of a single oral dose of bosentan,a dual endothelin receptor antagonist,in cats

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties and adverse effect profile of single‐dose oral bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in healthy cats. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined following a single mean ± SD oral dose of 3.2 ± 0.6 mg/kg of bosentan in 6 adult cats. Blood was collected for quantification of bosentan via high‐performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Blood and urine were evaluated for CBC, plasma biochemical profile, and urinalysis, and repeat physical examinations were performed to evaluate for adverse effects. The mean terminal half‐life of bosentan was 20.4 ± 17.2 h. The mean peak plasma concentration was 0.49 ± 0.24 g/mL, and the mean time to maximum plasma concentration was 6.8 ± 8.6 h. The area under the curve was 5.14 ± 3.81 h·μg/mL. Oral bosentan tablets were absorbed in cats, and no clinically important adverse events were noted. Further evaluation of repeat dosing, investigation into the in vivo efficacy of decreasing endothelin‐1 concentrations in cats, as well as safety in conjunction with other medications is warranted.     

Pharmacokinetics of a modified,compounded theophylline product in dogs

Theophylline is a commonly used bronchodilator drug for treatment of chronic canine bronchitis, but no formulations validated in dogs are currently available. An oral, modified and compounded theophylline product (MCT), which could fulfil this need, is available through a USP‐compliant, veterinary compounding pharmacy; however, its pharmacokinetic properties are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of MCT. Plasma drug concentrations were measured in seven healthy, fed dogs after single doses of intravenous aminophylline (8.6 mg/kg theophylline equivalent) and oral MCT (10 mg/kg). Systemic bioavailability of the MCT was 96.2 ± 32.9%. MCT times to maximum concentration, mean absorption time and terminal half‐life were 8.85 ± 3.63, 6.95 ± 3.42, and 8.67 ± 1.62 hr, respectively. Based on simulations of 10 mg/kg and 12‐hr dosing, steady‐state plasma theophylline concentrations are expected to exceed the minimum therapeutic concentration for 71.7 ± 35.6% of the dosing interval. Overall, the MCT product investigated showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics compared to previously validated extended‐release theophylline products. An oral dose of 10 mg/kg q 12 hr is likely an appropriate dosage to begin therapy; however, therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted because of inter‐individual variation.     

Pharmacokinetic properties of toceranib phosphate (Palladia™, SU11654), a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor,in laboratory dogs and dogs with mast cell tumors

Yancey, M. F., Merritt, D. A., Lesman, S. P., Boucher, J. F., Michels, G. M. Pharmacokinetic properties of toceranib phosphate (Palladia?, SU11654), a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in laboratory dogs and dogs with mast cell tumors. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 33 , 162–171. Toceranib phosphate (Palladia?, SU11654), an oral tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of mast cell tumors in dogs. The pharmacokinetics of toceranib phosphate has been characterized in dogs. Means of the following pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated following a 1.0 mg/kg i.v. dose to laboratory beagles: plasma clearance of 1.45 L/kg/h, volume of distribution of 29.7 L/kg, and terminal half‐life of 17.7 h. Following single oral doses of 3.25 mg/kg administered to laboratory beagles, mean C_max estimates ranged from 68.6 ng/mL to 112 ng/mL with t_max ranging from 5.3 h and 9.3 h postdose. Terminal half‐life was estimated at 31 h. Oral bioavailability was 76.9%. There were no statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences with any pharmacokinetic parameter due to fed/fasted state or with time during 13 weeks of every‐other‐day dosing at 3.25 mg/kg. Toceranib concentrations were proportional with dose over the range of 2.0 to 6.0 mg/kg. The pharmacokinetics of toceranib in client‐owned dogs of a variety of pure and mixed breeds with mast cell tumors was similar to that in healthy laboratory dogs. In summary, toceranib phosphate exhibited moderate clearance, a high volume of distribution, and a moderate elimination half‐life. After a single oral dose at 3.25 mg/kg, the concentration vs. time curve showed broad, sustained exposure with measurable concentrations for more than 48 h. These pharmacokinetic parameters support every‐other‐day administration of toceranib phosphate at an initial dose of 3.25 mg/kg for the treatment of mast cell tumors in dogs.     

Disposition and safety of zonisamide after intravenous and oral single dose and oral multiple dosing in normal hound dogs

The purpose of this study was to determine an oral dosing regimen of zonisamide in healthy dogs such that therapeutic concentrations would be safely reached and maintained at steady‐state. Adult hound dogs (n = 8) received a single IV (6.9) and an oral (PO) dose (10.3 mg/kg) using a randomized cross‐over design. Zonisamide was then administered at 10.3 mg/kg PO every 12 h for 8 weeks. Zonisamide was quantitated in blood compartments or urine by HPLC and data were subjected to noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis. Comparisons were made among blood compartments (one‐way anova ; P ≤ 0.05). Differences among blood compartments occurred in all derived pharmacokinetic paramenters for each route of administration after single and multiple dosing. After single PO dosing, plasma C_max was 14.4 ± 2.3 mcg/mL and elimination half‐life was 17.2 ± 3.6 h. After IV dosing, volume of distribution was 1.1 ± 0.25 L/kg, clearance was 58 ± 11 mL/h/kg and elimination t_1/2 was 12.9 ± 3.6 h. Oral bioavailability was 68 ± 12%; fraction of unbound drug approximated 60%. At steady‐state (4 days), differences occurred for for all parameters except C_max and C_min. Plasma C_max at steady‐state was 56 ± 12 mcg/mL, with 10% fluctuation between C_max and C_min. Plasma t_1/2 (h) was 23.52 ± 5.76 h. Clinical laboratory tests remained normal, with the exception of total T4, which was below normal limits at study end. In conclusion, 10 mg/kg twice daily results in peak plasma zonisamide which exceeds the recommended human therapeutic range (10 to 40 μg/mL) and is associated with suppression of thyroid hormone synthesis. A reasonable b.i.d starting dose for canine epileptics would be 3 mg/kg. Zonisamide monitored in either serum or plasma should be implemented at approximately 7 days.     

Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in plasma and subcutaneous fluid following oral administration of cefpodoxime proxetil in male beagle dogs

Kumar, V., Madabushi, R., Lucchesi, M. B. B., Derendorf, H. Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in plasma and subcutaneous fluid following oral administration of cefpodoxime proxetil in male beagle dogs. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 130–135. Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in plasma (total concentration) and subcutaneous fluid (free concentration using microdialysis) was investigated in dogs following single oral administration of prodrug cefpodoxime proxetil (equivalent to 5 and 10 mg/kg of cefpodoxime). In a cross over study design, six dogs per dose were utilized after a 1 week washout period. Plasma, microdialysate, and urine samples were collected upto 24 h and analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography. The average maximum concentration (C_max) of cefpodoxime in plasma was 13.66 (±6.30) and 27.14 (±4.56) μg/mL with elimination half‐life (t_1/2) of 3.01 (±0.49) and 4.72 (±1.46) h following 5 and 10 mg/kg dose, respectively. The respective average area under the curve (AUC_0–∞) was 82.94 (±30.17) and 107.71 (±30.79) μg·h/mL. Cefpodoxime was readily distributed to skin and average free C_max in subcutaneous fluid was 1.70 (±0.55) and 3.06 (±0.93) μg/mL at the two doses. Urinary excretion (unchanged cefpodoxime) was the major elimination route. Comparison of subcutaneous fluid concentrations using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of fT_>MIC indicated that at 10 mg/kg dose; cefpodoxime would yield good therapeutic outcome in skin infections for bacteria with MIC₅₀ upto 0.5 μg/mL while higher doses (or more frequent dosing) may be needed for bacteria with higher MICs. High urine concentrations suggested cefpodoxime use for urinary infections in dogs.     

Pharmacokinetics and milk secretion of gabapentin and meloxicam co‐administered orally in Holstein‐Friesian cows

Malreddy, P. R., Coetzee, J. F., KuKanich, B., Gehring, R. Pharmacokinetics and milk secretion of gabapentin and meloxicam co‐administered orally in Holstein‐Friesian cows. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap.  36 , 14–20. Management of neuropathic pain in dairy cattle could be achieved by combination therapy of gabapentin, a GABA analog and meloxicam, an nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug. This study was designed to determine specifically the depletion of these drugs into milk. Six animals received meloxicam at 1 mg/kg and gabapentin at 10 mg/kg, while another group (n = 6) received meloxicam at 1 mg/kg and gabapentin at 20 mg/kg. Plasma and milk drug concentrations were determined over 7 days postadministration by HPLC/MS followed by noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analyses. The mean (±SD) plasma C_max and T_max for meloxicam (2.89 ± 0.48 μg/mL and 11.33 ± 4.12 h) were not much different from gabapentin at 10 mg/kg (2.87 ± 0.2 μg/mL and 8 ± 0 h). The mean (±SD) milk C_max for meloxicam (0.41 ± 80.16 μg/mL) was comparable to gabapentin at 10 mg/kg (0.63 ± 0.13 μg/mL and 12 ± 6.69 h). The mean plasma and milk C_max for gabapentin at 20 mg/kg P.O. were almost double the values at 10 mg/kg. The mean (±SD) milk to plasma ratio for meloxicam (0.14 ± 0.04) was lower than for gabapentin (0.23 ± 0.06). The results of this study suggest that milk from treated cows will have low drug residue concentration soon after plasma drug concentrations have fallen below effective levels.     

Estimated plasma bupivacaine concentration after single dose and eight-hour continuous intra-articular infusion of bupivacaine in normal dogs

Objective— To estimate maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and time to maximum plasma (t_max) bupivacaine concentration after intra‐articular administration of bupivacaine for single injection (SI) and injection followed by continuous infusion (CI) in normal dogs. Study Design— Cross‐over design with a 2‐week washout period. Animals— Healthy Coon Hound dogs (n=8). Methods— Using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, canine plasma bupivacaine concentration was measured before and after SI (1.5 mg/kg) and CI (1.5 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg/h). Software was used to establish plasma concentration–time curves and estimate C_max, T_max and other pharmacokinetic variables for comparison of SI and CI. Results— Bupivacaine plasma concentration after SI and CI best fit a 3 exponential model. For SI, mean maximum concentration (C_max, 1.33±0.954 μg/mL) occurred at 11.37±4.546 minutes. For CI, mean C_max (1.13±0.509 μg/mL) occurred at 10.37±4.109 minutes. The area under the concentration–time curve was smaller for SI (143.59±118.390 μg/mL × min) than for CI (626.502±423.653 μg/mL × min, P=.02) and half‐life was shorter for SI (61.33±77.706 minutes) than for CI (245.363±104.415 minutes, P=.01). The highest plasma bupivacaine concentration for any dog was 3.2 μg/mL for SI and 2.3 μg/mL for CI. Conclusion— Intra‐articular bupivacaine administration results in delayed absorption from the stifle into the systemic circulation with mean C_max below that considered toxic and no systemic drug accumulation. Clinical Relevance— Intra‐articular bupivacaine can be administered with small risk of reaching toxic plasma concentrations in dogs, though toxic concentrations may be approached. Caution should be exercised with multimodal bupivacaine administration because plasma drug concentration may rise higher than with single intra‐articular injection.     

The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in healthy dogs concurrently receiving phenobarbital

Moore, S.A., Muñana, K.R., Papich, M.G., Nettifee‐Osborne, J.A. The pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in healthy dogs concurrently receiving phenobarbital. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 31–34. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a commonly used add‐on medication in dogs with refractory epilepsy. The objective of this study was to determine if the pharmacokinetics of LEV are altered by concurrent administration of phenobarbital (PB). Six healthy dogs received a single oral dose of LEV (16.7–27.8 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected at baseline and intermittently for 24 h. The study was repeated after the dogs received oral PB (2.0–3.3 mg/kg) twice daily for 21 days. Plasma LEV levels were evaluated by high pressure liquid chromatography, and data analyzed using a compartmental model. Compared with values determined when LEV was administered alone, concurrent administration of PB resulted in a decrease in LEV peak concentration (C_max) from 32.39 ± 6.76 to 18.22 ± 8.97 (P = 0.0071), a decrease in elimination half‐life (T_1/2) from 3.43 ± 0.47 to 1.73 ± 0.22 (P = 0.0005), and an increase in oral clearance from 124.93 ± 26.93 to 252.99 ± 135.43 ml/h/kg (P < 0.0001). Concurrent PB administration significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of LEV in the dog, indicating that dosage adjustments might be necessary when the drug is administered with PB.     

乳酸恩诺沙星可溶性粉在鸡体内的药动学研究

24只苏禽黄羽肉鸡随机分成2组,分别按10 mg/kg体重剂量静注和内服乳酸恩诺沙星。测定乳酸恩诺沙星在鸡体内的药动学参数和生物利用度。恩诺沙星血药浓度数据用3p87计算机软件处理。静注乳酸恩诺沙星后的血药浓度-时间数据符合二室开放模型,主要动力学参数:t1/2α(0.45±0.16)h,t1/2β(7.02±1.42)h,CL(s)(0.38±0.10)L/kg/h,AUC(23.69±5.56)(mg/L)×h。内服乳酸恩诺沙星的血药浓度时间数据,符合有吸收因素二室模型,主要动力学参数:t1/2ka(0.60±0.01)h,t1/2ke(8.25±1.73)h,tpeak(2.44±0.17)h,Cmax(1.44±0.30)mg/L,AUC(20.74±3.80)(mg/L)×h,F 87.54%。结果表明,乳酸恩诺沙星可溶性粉在鸡体内具有吸收快、分布广、消除较慢以及内服生物利用度高的药动学特征。     

Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of single and multiple dose administration of meloxicam in cats

Lehr, T., Narbe, R., Jöns, O., Kloft, C., Staab, A. Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation of single and multiple dose administration of meloxicam in cats. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 33 , 277–286. The objectives of these investigations were: first, to describe the pharmacokinetic properties of meloxicam in cats following single and multiple oral administration and secondly, to simulate different oral dosage regimes for meloxicam in cats after multiple dose administration to illustrate and evaluate those dosage regimes for the alleviation of inflammation and pain in cats. Six healthy domestic short hair cats were treated orally with various dosage regimes (0.05–0.2 mg/kg/day). Plasma samples were collected at predefined times and quantitatively analysed using liquid/liquid extraction followed by reverse phase HPLC with UV‐detection. Meloxicam plasma concentration data were analysed using the population pharmacokinetic approach (software: NONMEM). The final model was used to simulate different dosage regimes. The plasma concentration–time profiles of meloxicam in cats after oral single and multiple dose administration were best described by an open one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and first‐order elimination. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated to be 0.00656 L/h/kg for the total apparent body clearance (CL/F), 0.245 L/kg for the apparent volume of distribution (V/F), 1.26 1/h for the absorption constant (K_A) and 25.7 h for the mean plasma terminal half‐life. Simulations showed that the median trough steady‐state concentrations of 228 ng/mL were reached after five, one or 6 days following a single initial dose of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg each followed by 0.05 mg/kg/day.     

Pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation of ondansetron following oral administration in dogs

Ondansetron is a potent antiemetic drug that has been commonly used to treat acute and chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in dogs. The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacokinetic analysis of ondansetron in dogs following oral administration of a single dose. A single 8‐mg oral dose of ondansetron (Zofran^®) was administered to beagles (n = 18), and the plasma concentrations of ondansetron were measured by liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry. The data were analyzed by modeling approaches using ADAPT5, and model discrimination was determined by the likelihood‐ratio test. The peak plasma concentration (C_max) was 11.5 ± 10.0 ng/mL at 1.1 ± 0.8 h. The area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration was 15.9 ± 14.7 ng·h/mL, and the half‐life calculated from the terminal phase was 1.3 ± 0.7 h. The interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters was high (coefficient of variation > 44.1%), and the one‐compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron well. The estimated plasma concentration range of the usual empirical dose from the Monte Carlo simulation was 0.1–13.2 ng/mL. These findings will facilitate determination of the optimal dose regimen for dogs with CINV.     

A comparative study of the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral trimethoprim/sulfadiazine formulations in the horse

The biopharmaceutical properties of four fuced trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations were investigated in the horse. Eight fasted horses were dosed at 1 week intervals in a sequentially designed study with one intravenous (i.v.) and three oral trimethoprim/sulfadiazine (TMP/SDZ) formulations (1, 2 and 3) administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg trimethoprim (TMP) and 25 mg/kg sulfadiazine (SDZ). Plasma concentrations of each compound were monitored for 48 h. Pharmacokinetic parameters (volume of distribution, bioavailability and total body clearance) for TMP and SDZ were calculated and compared. After oral administration plasma concentrations of TMP and SDZ increased rapidly. With all three paste formulations, TMP peak plasma concentrations were attained within 2 h. SDZ mean peak plasma concentrations were reached at 2.59 ± 0.48 h for a commercial paste (l), and at 1.84 ± 0.66 h and 1.95 ± 0.61 h for the two self-made formulations (2 and 3). Mean peak plasma TMP concentrations (± SD) were 1.72 ± 0.36 μg/ml, 1.42 ± 0.37 μg/ml and 1.31 ± 0.36 μ g/d, and mean peak plasma SDZ concentrations 12.11 ± 4.5 5 μg/ml, 12.72 ± 3.47 μg/ml and 15.45 ± 4.74 μg/ml for preparations 1, 2 and 3. The bioavailability of TMP was 67.0 ± 20.3%, 57.7 ±21.6% and 60.9 f 18.9% and of SDZ 57.6 ± 14.8%, 59.3 ± 19.5% and 65.9 ± 5.8% for SDZ for 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Following i.v. administration TMP/SDZ plasma concentration ratios approached the optimal 1:20 ratio (It 10%) for about 5 h, but following the oral administrations this ratio was only achieved for a very short time-span. No adverse effects were seen following i.v. and oral administration. In considering the pharmacokinetic data in combination with in vitro antibacterial sensitivity data, it is concluded that treatment at a dose of 5 mg/kg TMP and 25 mg/kg SDZ with a dosing interval of 12 h can be regarded as therapeutically effective for susceptible bacteria (MIC₉₀ 0.25/4.75) for all three oral formulations. It is concluded that neither the formulation nor the addition of different excipients result in significantly different bioavailabilities.     

Pharmacokinetics of morphine and plasma concentrations of morphine-6-glucuronide following morphine administration to dogs

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) following morphine administered intravenously and orally to dogs in a randomized crossover design. Six healthy 3–4-year-old Beagle dogs were administered morphine sulfate (0.5 mg/kg) as an i.v. bolus and extended release tablets were administered orally as whole tablets (1.6 ± 0.1 mg/kg) in a randomized crossover design. Plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography and electrochemical coulometric detection. Following i.v. administration all dogs exhibited dysphoria and sedation, and four or six dogs vomited. Mean ± SE values for half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and clearance after i.v. administration were 1.16 ± 0.15 h, 4.55 ± 0.17 L/kg, and 62.46 ± 10.44 mL/min/kg, respectively. One dog vomited following oral administration and was excluded from the oral analysis. Oral bioavailability was 5% as determined from naïve-averaged analysis. The M-6-G was not detected in any plasma samples following oral or i.v. administration of morphine at a 25 ng/mL the limit of quantification. Computer simulations concluded morphine sulfate administered 0.5 mg/kg intravenously every 2 h would maintain morphine plasma concentrations consistent with analgesic plasma concentrations in humans. Oral morphine is poorly and erratically absorbed in dogs.     

牛皮下注射卡洛芬注射液的药动学试验研究

为研究卡洛芬注射液在牛体内的药动学特征,将8头健康牛随机分为两组,每组4头,给药剂量为1.4 mg/kg BW,给药后按设计的采血点采集血样,采用超高液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)测定血浆中卡洛芬的药物浓度,用WinNonlin8.1软件计算药动学参数。结果显示：牛单次皮下注射受试制剂卡洛芬注射液在牛体内主要药动学参数如下：平均最高血药浓度(Cmax)为(17473.30±2398.73)ng·mL^-1,平均药时曲线下面积(AUClast)为(1052647.93±143055.37)h·ng·mL^-1,平均达峰时间(Tmax)为8.00±2.62 h,平均消除半衰期(T_1/2)为55.69±3.25 h;牛单次皮下注射参比制剂卡洛芬注射液的主要药动学参数如下：平均最高血药浓度(Cmax)为(15695.98±4865.73)ng·mL^-1,平均药时曲线下面积(AUClast)为(1002858.15±297235.31)h·ng·mL^-1,平均达峰时间(Tmax...     

Pharmacokinetics of the individual enantiomer S-(+)-ketoprofen after intravenous and oral administration in dogs at two dose levels

The pharmacokinetic of the individual S-(+)-enantiomer of ketoprofen, S-(+)-ketoprofen, after intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) administration was determined in six dogs at 1 and 3 mg/kg. Plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The concentration–time curves were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. Steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) and clearance (Cl) of S-(+)-ketoprofen after IV administration were 0.22 ± 0.07 and 0.19 ± 0.03 L/kg, and 0.10 ± 0.02 and 0.09 ± 0.01 L/h/kg, at 1 and 3 mg/kg, respectively. Following PO administration, S-(+)-ketoprofen achieved maximum plasma concentrations of 4.91 ± 0.76 and 12.47 ± 0.62 μg/ml, at two dose levels, respectively. The absolute bioavailability after PO route was 88.66 ± 12.95% and 85.36 ± 13.90%, respectively.     

Pharmacokinetic studies of levofloxacin after oral administration in healthy and febrile cow calves

The present experiment was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in six healthy cross bred female cow calves (4 to 6 months age) weighing between 40 to 80 kg. Plasma from blood was separated by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm. Quantitative estimation of levofloxacin was done by UV-VIS spectrophotometer at 286 nm. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cp_max ) of levofloxacin in febrile calves (5.28?±?0.32 µg/ml) did not differ significantly as compared with healthy calves (4.50?±?0.22 µg/ml) after single dose (20 mg/kg) oral administration. The mean therapeutic plasma concentration ( Cp_ther ) of levofloxacin was maintained for longer period in febrile calves (10 h) as compared to healthy calves ( 8 h). The mean maximum urine concentration (Cu_max) in febrile (40.86?±?2.19 µg/ml) also did not differ significantly as compared with healthy calves (39.38?±?2.43 µg/ml). No significant difference in various pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma was observed in healthy calves ( β?=?0.23?±?0.01/h ; t1/2 β?=?3.00?±?0.17 h and MRT?=?4.66?±?0.14 h ) and febrile calves ( β?=?0.23?±?0.01/ h; t1/2 β?=?3.05?±?0.16 h and MRT?=?5.04?±?0.14 h ) . The mean value of β, and t ½ β calculated in urine also did not differ between healthy and febrile calves. However, the value of MRT(3.79?±?0.07 h) and Cl_B(1.65?±?0.09 ml/kg/min) calculated in urine of febrile calves significantly(p?B?=?2.09?±?0.13 ml/kg/min). Based on kinetic profile levofloxacin may be given orally at the dose rate of 1.49 mg/kg B.W.at 8 h intervals in febrile calves.     

Pharmacokinetics studies of enrofloxacin injectable in situ forming gel in dogs

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of enrofloxacin (ENR) injectable in situ gel we developed in dogs following a single intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Twelve healthy dogs were randomly divided into two groups (six dogs per group), then administrated a single 20 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) ENR injectable in situ gel and a single 5 mg/kg b.w. ENR conventional injection, respectively. High‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to determine ENR plasma concentrations. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ENR injectable in situ gel and conventional injection in dogs are as follows: MRT (mean residence time) (45.59 ± 14.05) h verse (11.40 ± 1.64) h, AUC (area under the blood concentration vs. time curve) (28.66 ± 15.41) μg·h/mL verse (11.06 ± 3.90) μg·h/mL, c_max (maximal concentration) (1.59 ± 0.35) μg/mL verse (1.46 ± 0.07) μg/mL, t_max (time needed to reach c_max) (1.25 ± 1.37) h verse (1.40 ± 0.55) h, t_1/2λz (terminal elimination half‐life) (40.27 ± 17.79) h verse (10.32 ± 0.97) h. The results demonstrated that the in situ forming gel system could increase dosing interval of ENR and thus reduced dosing frequency during long‐term treatment. Therefore, the ENR injectable in situ gel seems to be worth popularizing in veterinary clinical application.     

Pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats

Siao, K. T., Pypendop, B. H., Stanley, S. D., Ilkiw, J. E. Pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34 , 599–604. This study reports the pharmacokinetics of amantadine in cats, after both i.v. and oral administration. Six healthy adult domestic shorthair female cats were used. Amantadine HCl (5 mg/kg, equivalent to 4 mg/kg amantadine base) was administered either intravenously or orally in a crossover randomized design. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to amantadine administration, and at various times up to 1440 min following intravenous, or up to 2880 min following oral administration. Plasma amantadine concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and plasma amantadine concentration–time data were fitted to compartmental models. A two‐compartment model with elimination from the central compartment best described the disposition of amantadine administered intravenously in cats, and a one‐compartment model best described the disposition of oral amantadine in cats. After i.v. administration, the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment and apparent volume of distribution at steady‐state [mean ± SEM (range)], and the clearance and terminal half‐life [harmonic mean ± jackknife pseudo‐SD (range)] were 1.5 ± 0.3 (0.7–2.5) L/kg, 4.3 ± 0.2 (3.7–5.0) L/kg, 8.2 ± 2.1 (5.9–11.4) mL·min/kg, and 348 ± 49 (307–465) min, respectively. Systemic availability [mean ± SEM (range)] and terminal half‐life after oral administration [harmonic mean ± jackknife pseudo‐SD (range)] were 130 ± 11 (86–160)% and 324 ± 41 (277–381) min, respectively.     

Pharmacokinetics and distribution of minocycline in mature horses after oral administration of multiple doses and comparison with minimum inhibitory concentrations

Reasons for performing study: Minocycline holds great potential for use in horses not only for its antimicrobial effects but also for its anti‐inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. However, there are no pharmacokinetic or safety data available regarding the use of oral minocycline in horses. Objectives: To determine pharmacokinetics, safety and penetration into plasma, synovial fluid, aqueous humour (AH) and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) of minocycline after oral administration of multiple doses in horses and to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of minocycline for equine pathogenic bacteria. Methods: Six horses received minocycline (4 mg/kg bwt q. 12 h for 5 doses). Thirty‐three blood and 9 synovial fluid samples were collected over 96 h. Aqueous humour and CSF samples were collected 1 h after the final dose. Minocycline concentrations were measured using high pressure liquid chromatography. The MIC values of minocycline for equine bacterial isolates were determined. Results: At steady state, the mean ± s.d. peak concentration of minocycline in the plasma was 0.67 ± 0.26 µg/ml and the mean half‐life was 11.48 ± 3.23 h. The highest trough synovial fluid minocycline concentration was 0.33 ± 0.12 µg/ml. The AH concentration of minocycline was 0.09 ± 0.03 µg/ml in normal eyes and 0.11 ± 0.04 µg/ml in blood aqueous barrier‐disrupted eyes. The mean CSF concentration of minocycline was 0.38 ± 0.09 µg/ml. The MIC values were determined for 301 isolates. Minocycline concentrations were above the MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ for many gram‐positive equine pathogens. Potential relevance: This study supports the use of orally administered minocycline at a dose of 4 mg/kg bwt every 12 h for the treatment of nonocular infections caused by susceptible (MIC≤0.25 µg/ml) organisms in horses. Further studies are required to determine the dose that would be effective for the treatment of ocular infections.