土柱尺寸对扰动黏壤土饱和导水率的影响

土壤饱和导水率Ks是最基本的水力参数之一,而已知实验室内其值的确定受土柱尺寸的影响.以关中的塿土为研究对象,在室内,采用定水头法,研究5～30 cm内6个不同土柱尺寸对扰动黏壤土Ka测定的影响.结果表明：随着时间的延伸,Ks逐渐减小,其值最初降幅较大,其后趋于稳定,且在5 ～ 30 cm土柱直径范围内,Ks随着土柱直径的变大,扰动黏壤土的Ks递增,二者线性相关,y=0.000 4x＋0.003 7（R2=0.965 1）.研究结果可为测定Ks合理测定时间段及合理尺寸的选择提供参考.     

Effect of zeolite and saline water application on saturated hydraulic conductivity and infiltration in different soil textures

The effects of zeolite application (0, 4, 8 and16 g kg^?1) and saline water (0.5, 1.5, 3.0 and 5.0 dS m^?1) on saturated hydraulic conductivity (K _s) and sorptivity (S) in different soils were evaluated under laboratory conditions. Results showed that K _s was increased at salinity levels of 0.5‐1.5 dS m^?1 in clay loam and loam with 8 and 4 g zeolite kg^?1 soil, respectively, and at salinity levels of 3.0–5.0 dS m^?1 with 16 g zeolite kg^?1 soil. K _s was decreased by using low and high salinity levels in sandy loam with application of 8 and 16 g zeolite kg^?1, respectively. In clay loam, salinity levels of 0.5–3.0 dS m^?1 with application of 16 g kg^?1 zeolite and 5.0 dS m^?1 with application of 8 g zeolite kg^?1 soil resulted in the lowest values of S. In loam, all salinity levels with application of 16 g zeolite kg^?1 soil increased S compared with other zeolite application rates. In sandy loam, only a salinity level of 0.5 dS m^?1 with application of 4 g zeolite kg^?1 soil increased S. Other zeolite applications decreased S, whereas increasing the zeolite application to 16 g kg^?1 soil resulted in the lowest value of S.     

烟台棕壤土饱和导水率的初步研究

该文利用单环入渗的概化解,对不同土地利用方式下烟台棕壤土的饱和导水率进行了研究,同时分析了不同单环直径对求解饱和导水率产生的影响。研究结果表明：草地、裸地和道路的入渗速率、累积入渗量和饱和导水率呈现依次降低的变化趋势,利用直径为20、30和45 cm的入渗环得到的饱和导水率具有明显的差异性。根据求解的饱和导水率计算的累积入渗量非常接近实测值,整体相对误差很小,草地、裸地和道路,在5、7和40 m in后浮动在5%以内;在15、43和55 m in后变化幅度小于1%。20、30和45 cm入渗环累积入渗量计算值的相对误差初始阶段波动较大,随后逐渐趋于平稳。     

利用圆盘入渗仪推求含碎石土壤饱和水力传导度(英)

在模拟土柱中，利用圆盘入渗仪对碎石对土壤饱和水力传导度的影响进行了分析。结果表明：含碎石土壤饱和水力传导度可以通过对不同负压下土壤稳定入渗速率进行非线性回归获得。含碎石土壤饱和水力传导度与去除碎石后的土壤饱和水力传导度及碎石形状指数密切相关。试验中含碎石土壤的饱和水力传导度随碎石含量的增加而呈指数降低趋势。     

秸秆-膨润土-PAM改良材料对砂质土壤饱和导水率的影响

为改善砂质土壤持水状况,设计了由作物秸秆、膨润土和聚丙烯酰胺（PAM）配制的改良材料,以重庆市分布面积较大的冷沙黄泥为研究对象,采用恒定水头入渗双环法,研究了秸秆改良材料对砂质土壤饱和导水率的影响。结果表明,施用秸秆改良材料能增加砂质土壤的饱和导水率,并且随着施用剂量的增大,土壤饱和导水率逐渐增加;随土培时间的延长土样饱和导水率均出现了先增大后减小的趋势,当土培时间为60 d时土样饱和导水率达到最大值;添加麦秆改良材料（质量分数为10 g/kg,配方中PAM质量分数为2%）的土样,在培养60 d后其饱和导水率是对照组的4.97倍,对砂质土壤改良效果最明显。可见,秸秆改良材料可以改善砂质土壤持水状况,对砂质土壤具有改良作用。     

植被群落演替对土壤饱和导水率的影响

土壤饱和导水率是表征土壤入渗能力的重要参数,对不同土地利用类型反应敏感。为了揭示植被演替对土壤剖面上饱和导水率的影响规律,采用恒定水头法测定了天童林区155 a植物群落演替序列60 cm深土壤剖面上的饱和导水率。结果表明,不同演替阶段饱和导水率均随土壤深度增加迅速降低,在0～20 cm土层内,各演替阶段饱和导水率均存在极显著差异,0～60 cm土层内饱和导水率的平均值从裸地、石栎+檵木灌丛、马尾松林、木荷+马尾松林、木荷林到栲树林升高极为显著,植物群落演替到灌丛阶段,平均饱和导水率已与裸地存在显著差异,演     

Effect of zeolite on saturated hydraulic conductivity and crack behavior of silty clay paddled soil

The addition of zeolites to soil modifies soil physical and chemical properties. The objectives of this research were to study the effect of zeolite on saturated hydraulic conductivity, K _s, and crack behavior in a silty clay paddled soil. Soil samples were mixed with 0, 4, 8 and 12 g kg^?1 of zeolite for K _s determination, and 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 g kg^?1 for soil crack measurements. Saturated hydraulic conductivity was measured using the constant head method. The results indicated that K _s was significantly increased at a zeolite application rate of 8 g kg^?1. Furthermore, an increase in zeolite content up to 8 g kg^?1 decreased soil crack area after paddling and first rewetting. Higher amounts of zeolite (e.g. 12 g kg^?1) increased crack density after the second rewetting. However, a 50% reduction in crack depth occurred with zeolite application rates of 8 and 12 g kg^?1 in comparison with controls. Thus, a zeolite application rate of 8 g kg^?1 is recommended for soil crack reduction in intermittent-flood irrigation. Furthermore, a relationship was obtained between crack area density (Ln), gravimetric soil water content and zeolite application rate. After the second irrigation, a relationship was also obtained between crack depth, gravimetric soil water content and zeolite application rate. Crack depth showed a positive and highly significant linear correlation with crack width.     

黄土高原坡地表层土壤饱和导水率和水分含量空间变异特征

表层土壤水分含量和饱和导水率对深层土壤水分的动态的变化具有重要的决定作用。在黄土高原坡地（50m×360 m）范围内进行网格（10 m×10 m）取样,用地统计学方法研究表层（0～30 cm）土壤饱和导水率和水分含量的空间变异特征。结果表明：1）坡地表层土壤密度变化规律为坡下位大于坡上位,土壤饱和导水率变异系数为0.37,属于中等变异强度;2）饱和导水率和自然对数化的饱和导水率在360 m尺度内均不具备空间结构特征,是纯随机变量,线性有基台模型适用于描述表层土壤水分的分布特征,水分分布存在明显的块金效应,并且随滞后距离的增加半方差变大;3）饱和导水率和水分含量从坡上位到坡下位均呈现波浪式变化,饱和导水率大的采样点土壤水分含量低,反之则高。     

蓄水坑入渗表层土壤体积质量和饱和导水率的变化

表层土壤体积质量和导水率是影响土壤入渗及水分运动的重要物理参数。该文采用土壤切片技术和数字图像分析技术,分析了蓄水坑灌条件下入渗水头对砂壤土表层土壤体积质量的影响,进行了不同入渗水头、土壤体积质量对砂壤土表层土壤饱和导水率的试验研究,并对蓄水坑侧向水平入渗湿润锋变化的试验结果与数值模拟结果进行对比分析。结果表明：该研究试验条件下（土壤体积质量为1.345 g/cm3）,入渗水头对土壤体积质量和表层土壤饱和导水率有较明显的影响。随着入渗水头的增大,其作用下的表层土壤体积质量趋于增大,土壤结构趋于密实,表层土壤的饱和导水率趋于减小;表层土壤饱和导水率与入渗水头和土壤体积质量之间呈乘幂关系,且表层土壤饱和导水率对土壤体积质量的变化较为敏感,当土壤体积质量达到某一程度时（1.466 g/cm3）,入渗水头对表层土壤饱和导水率的影响甚微。研究成果揭示了入渗水头影响蓄水坑土壤入渗的微观机制,为进一步研究蓄水坑灌法提供了理论依据。     

宁南山区草地植被恢复方式对土壤饱和导水率的影响

为评价宁南山区草地植被不同恢复方式对土壤入渗性能的影响,以不同植被群落的饱和导水率为研究对象,采用逐步回归研究退耕农地、禁牧荒地、封育草地导水率的变化及影响因子,并探讨了其作用机制。结果表明：3种植被恢复方式均有利于0-40 cm土壤饱和导水性能提高;各土层土壤饱和导水率均随植被恢复而不断提高,0-5 cm土层改善作用最为明显;农地退耕序列和荒地禁牧序列5-40 cm土层、封育草地序列0-40 cm土层土壤饱和导水率随土层深度下降而降低;影响土壤饱和导水率的因子为土壤有机质因子和土壤结构因子;3种植被恢复方式土壤有机质质量分数与Ks均呈显著的线性相关关系,在该区域有机质质量分数越高,Ks增加越快;土壤有机质积累是土壤饱和导水率提高的根本动力。因此,草地封育更利于提高使该地区土壤导水性能提高,促进生态恢复。     

应用土壤质地预测干旱区葡萄园土壤饱和导水率空间分布

田间表层土壤饱和导水率的空间变异性是影响灌溉水分入渗和土壤水分再分布的主要因素之一,研究土壤饱和导水率的空间变化规律,有助于定量估计土壤水分的空间分布和设计农田的精准灌溉管理制度。为了探究应用其他土壤性质如质地、容重、有机质预测土壤饱和导水率空间分布的可行性,试验在7.6 hm2的葡萄园内,采用均匀网格25 m×25 m与随机取样相结合的方式,测定了表层(0～10 cm)土壤饱和导水率、粘粒、粉粒、砂粒、容重和有机质含量,借助经典统计学和地统计学,分析了表层土壤饱和导水率的空间分布规律、与土壤属性的空间相关性,并对普通克里格法、回归法和回归克里格法预测土壤饱和导水率空间分布的结果进行了对比。结果表明:1)土壤饱和导水率具有较强的变异性,平均值为1.64 cm/d,变异系数为1.17;2)表层土壤饱和导水率60%的空间变化是由随机性或小于取样尺度的空间变异造成;3)土壤饱和导水率与粘粒、粉粒、砂粒和有机质含量具有一定空间相关性,而与土壤容重几乎没有空间相关性;4)在中值区以土壤属性辅助的回归克里格法对土壤饱和导水率的预测精度较好,在低值和高值区其与普通克里格法表现类似。研究结果将为更好地描述土壤饱和导水率空间变异结构及更准确地预测其空间分布提供参考。     

热融湖塘对青藏高原土壤饱和导水率的影响及因素分析

为研究多年冻土区热融湖塘对湖岸生态水文过程的影响,该文基于湖岸不同迹地植被发育、导水性及土壤理化性质的分析,并结合土壤转换函数(pedo-transfer functions,PTFs),对土壤导水性及其影响因素进行研究。结果表明:热融湖塘的形成使土壤环境发生了重要演变,其中湖岸死根区土壤饱和导水率相比于未影响区域(110.88 cm/d)增加了70.1%之多,而其在盐渍化区域相比于未影响区域减少了33.8%,同时土壤饱和导水率随着坡度的增加而增强;通过比较ROSETTA、CAMPBELL和VAUCLIN 3种土壤转换函数的预测能力,发现VAUCLIN模型更适合于模拟青藏高原高寒草甸土壤饱和导水率。热融湖塘影响迹地对土壤饱和导水率的变化,是植被盖度、有机质含量、颗粒组成等因素耦合影响作用的结果,运用土壤转换函数对其进行预测时,须综合考虑以上因子。对热融湖塘不同迹地土壤水力参数的研究可为区域土壤侵蚀,产流模式及水文过程的研究提供理论基础。     

陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率的影响

该文以陕北水蚀风蚀交错区普遍发育的地表和地上两种生物结皮为研究对象，分别以3种非生物结皮（无结皮、物理结皮、去除生物结皮）为对照，使用盘式入渗仪测定其饱和导水率。结果表明：与无结皮土壤相比，两种类型生物结皮均可极显著降低土壤饱和导水率；与去除生物结皮土壤相比，两种类型生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率的降低均不显著；与有物理结皮发育的土壤相比，地表生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率的降低不显著，而地上生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率的降低显著。一方面，两种生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率均有明显降低作用，预示生物结皮在降雨活动中可能会增加径流、降低入渗，阻碍研究区水分亏缺条件下的植被恢复和生态与环境建设。另一方面，与不同的对照相比，生物结皮对土壤饱和导水率的影响截然不同，该结论可在一定程度上解释当前有关生物结皮影响土壤水分入渗方面所存在的分歧。     

基于Guelph法的土壤饱和导水率测定方法对比

为探寻该区域Ks的最优测定方法,应用Guelph入渗仪测量了川中低山丘陵区的林地和坡耕地土壤的饱和导水率,对比分析单水头法(LA法、USH法)和双水头法(TH法、BH法)所测得饱和导水率(Ks)的差异,同时比较了田间原位Guelph法与室内降水头法测定结果的差异。对于同一土层深度,不同方法估算所得的Ks有较大的差异:1)双水头TH法测得的值最大(坡耕地土层>20～40cm除外),林地0～20cm,>20～40cm土层的Ks值分别为0.134,0.266mm/min,坡耕地0～20cm土层的Ks值为0.860mm/min。单水头USH法5cm水头所得值最小,林地0～20和>20～40cm土层的Ks值分别为0.015和0.022mm/min,坡耕地对应土层则分别为0.040和0.022mm/min;2)单水头USH法10cm水头(USH2)测得的Ks大于5cm水头(USH1)所得值,采用前者所测得林地0～20和>20～40cm土层、坡耕地0～20和>20～40cm土层的Ks值分别为0.031,0.056,0.211,0.031mm/min;3)田间原位BH法和USH2法(压力水头为10cm)测定的Ks均大于室内降水头法所测得的值,这可能与室内环刀法在采样中对土壤大孔隙通道的切断与破坏、所测定土壤样品的体积较小有关。综合上述结果,并考虑到单水头法操作简便,故而该研究推荐在川中低山丘陵紫色土地区使用单水头USH2法,压力水头为10cm。     

基于线性源法与图像处理的土壤饱和导水率快速测量方法

土壤饱和导水率是计算土壤剖面水通量以及设计灌溉和排水系统的重要参数,其测量准确与否直接影响各类水文和水动力学模型的预测精度。然而,现有土壤饱和导水率测定方法费时费力,给土壤水动力学研究工作带来了诸多不便。为此,该研究提出了一种基于线性源入流法与手机图像处理相结合的土壤饱和导水率快速测量方法。该方法首先利用手机拍照获取图像记录充分供水条件下线性水流在土壤表面扩散的过程,图像经处理后计算出土壤表面湿润面积及其随时间的变化关系,然后根据线性源入流法估算的土壤稳态入渗率来测得土壤饱和导水率,并与传统的定水头标准法测得的饱和导水率进行对比。结果表明：图像经畸变校正与二值化处理之后计算出栓皮栎林区土壤、油松林区土壤和砂壤土表面湿润面积与时间具有较好的幂指数关系,决定系数R2分别为0.994、0.995和0.998;在此基础上,采用线性源入流法测量栓皮栎林区土壤、油松林区土壤和砂壤土的稳态入渗率（即土壤饱和导水率）分别为23.40±1.21、23.86±1.83和22.99±2.26 mm/h,同时使用定水头标准法测量三种土样得到的饱和导水率分别为24.41±1.53、24.26±0.37和23.81±0.10 mm/h,与定水头标准法相比,该研究提出的土壤饱和导水率测量方法的相对误差分别为4.14%、1.64%和3.42%。可见,该研究提出的测定方法较为合理、简便、准确,可为获取土壤饱和导水率提供一种新的测量手段,后续研究会将该方法用于野外环境下土壤饱和导水率的原位测定,并验证该方法的准确性。     

Effects of cover crops on soil hydraulic properties during commodity crop growing season

Cover crops (CCs) can improve soil hydraulic properties prior to termination, but their effects on soil hydraulic properties during the growing season are less known. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of no-till CC on the soil hydraulic properties during the commodity crop growing season in Murfreesboro, USA. The CCs included hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), winter peas (Lathyrus hirsutus L.), oats (Avena sativa), triticale (Triticale hexaploide Lart.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.). The cash crop grown was corn (Zea mays). Soil samples were collected using a cylindrical core (55 mm inside diameter, 60 mm long) at 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm depths during April (prior to CC termination), May, June and July. Results showed that soil bulk density (Db) was 23%, 12%, 11% and 10% higher under no cover crop (NCC) compared with CC management during April – July, respectively. This suggests a lower rate of soil consolidation under CC management even after several rainfall events. Four months after CC termination, macroporosity and total porosity were 306 and 50% higher, respectively, under CC compared with NCC management. Therefore, saturated hydraulic conductivity (K_sat) during July was two times higher under CC management compared with NCC management and this can affect increase water infiltration and conservation during the growing season. Due to CC root-induced improvement in macroporosity, CCs had 64% higher volumetric water content (θ) at saturation during July compared with NCC management. Cover crops can improve soil hydraulic properties and these benefits can persist for up to four months after termination.     

利用自由点源入渗法测定土壤导水参数的室内试验

土壤水分运动过程模拟计算的准确性取决于土壤水分运动参数的精度,因此正确确定土壤水力参数成为一项重要任务。自由点源入渗方法是依据稳定点源入渗公式发展而来,其准确性缺乏验证。该文通过试验资料,对该方法进行了评估,结果显示该方法可以用于土壤水力参数的确定。     

Effect of data resolution on soil hydraulic conductivity prediction

The aim of the paper is to compare results of the instantaneous profile method (IPM) for measurement and calculation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity k(ψ) of soils obtained with different measurement data resolution. The application of IPM allows to realize a great number of k(ψ) measurements for the purpose of mapping soil properties on large areas. Application of shorter samples i.e. less sensors makes the method even more quick and cheap. The calculation of unsaturated soil water conductivity by the IPM method bases on measurements of time and space variability of water content and water pressure within the soil sample in a cylinder. The spatial resolution of data depends on the number of probes applied in the core. The question arises how the number of compartments within one core influences the calculation of soil hydraulic conductivity. Application of three sensors instead of five reduced the accuracy of calculation but allowes to use 5 cm long standard cores during unsaturated flow experiment.<?show $6#>     

沿海滩涂农田耕层土壤饱和导水率间接方法的评价

为筛选和构建适合苏北沿海滩涂围垦农田耕层土壤饱和水力传导率间接估算的土壤转换函数,在典型地块实测土壤饱和导水率和相关土壤基本性质的基础上,分析了11种根据基本土壤性质预测饱和导水率的转换函数方法的适用性,同时探讨了基于人工神经网络方法的土壤转换函数的预测效果。结果表明:滩涂围垦农田耕层土壤平均饱和导水率为10.04 cm/d,属低透水强度;在现有的土壤饱和导水率转换函数中,Vereecken函数是最适合滩涂围垦农区土壤、具有最佳预测精度的转换函数,其预测均方根误差为8.154,其次是Li、Campbell和Rawls函数;以砂粒、粘粒、容重和有机质作为输入因子,基于人工神经网络的土壤转换函数较Vereecken函数其预测均方根误差降至7.920,在输入因子中增加土壤盐分指标可进一步提高饱和导水率的预测精度,其预测均方根误差降为7.634。本文的研究结果显示利用人工神经网络方法建立的转换函数可有效提高滩涂盐渍农田土壤饱和导水率的预测精度。