共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
利用中国知网《中国学术文献网络出版总库》的数据,对中文核心期刊《果树学报》2005-2009年所载被国内文献引用的论文年代分布、引用频次分布、选题学科分布、论文所在区域、引用期刊分布等进行系统调查、分析,揭示《果树学报》的现状。 相似文献
6.
为了解国内水产类科技期刊的基本现状和影响力水平,对《中国科技期刊引证报告(扩刊版)》2014—2016 年版中连续收录的17 种水产科技期刊的影响因子、总被引频次、即年指标、他引率、来源文献量、海外论文比和基金论文比共7项文献计量指标进行统计分析,并采用模型法评估17种期刊的学术影响力。结果显示,2014—2016 年17 种水产科技期刊的总被引次数、即年指标、他引率和基金论文比等4 个指标呈上升趋势,来源文献量和影响因子基本保持不变,海外论文比呈下降趋势。17 种水产类科技期刊2016 年的平均学术影响力较2014 年增长8.98%,各刊发展趋势呈多样化;学术影响力位于前5 位的为《水产学报》、《中国水产科学》、《中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版)》、《水产科学》和《上海海洋大学学报》;学术影响力增长速度位于前3 位的是《南方水产科学》、《中国渔业质量与标准》和《中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版)》。研究表明,2014—2016 年国内17 种水产科技期刊的主要计量指标和学术影响力呈总体上升、稳步发展趋势,但发展不均衡,两极分化现象明显,建议各刊加强自身建设,坚持以质量为根本推动影响力提升,促进期刊的健康、可持续发展。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
农业高校图书馆与地方信息网站共建信息服务平台的研究 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
为了更好地发挥农业高校图书馆在农业信息化进程中的作用,更好地为当地的“三农”提供信息服务。通过网络访问的方法对山东省17个市辖区的农业信息网进行了调查,发现各地的农业信息网站严重缺乏专业信息机构的信息支持。结合农业图书馆的资源优势和地方网站的平台优势,提出农业高校图书馆与地方信息网站共建信息服务平台的具体设想,构建了“实用技术”、“专家在线”、“农民培训”、“农业统计”、“农家书屋”、“信息服务”6个模块的基本框架。 相似文献
12.
13.
科技期刊的改革、发展和壮大,需要依靠大量的优秀编辑出版人才来支撑。人才的培养,是出版单位的基本建设任务之一。中国科技期刊编辑主要来源于主办单位的科技人员。科技编辑角色转换具有专业知识扎实、自学能力和接受能力较强、职业道德良好等优势;同时存在思想准备不足、语文功底不足、博识不足、市场意识不足等问题。传统的单一的由科技人员转任科技编辑的用人机制应有所创新,科技期刊才能顺应改革潮流,优化人才结构,提高核心竞争力,实现可持续发展。 相似文献
14.
《European Journal of Agronomy》2009,30(4):208-212
To publish papers that have impact is indispensable for good scientists. It is frequently accepted that the impact factor (IF) of a journal reflects the likelihood of a paper to have impact. Many scientists may then attempt publishing their papers in journals with the highest possible IF. This is relevant for crop scientists as in many cases our hypotheses may be relevant to agronomy/agriculture but the product of our work may be published in the more basic plant science journals, which in general have higher IF than agronomic journals. To test whether agronomic journals may be better vehicles than plant science journals for crop physiological work, I did an analysis of my own publications (only “standard” papers, disregarding reviews) relating their annual citation rates against the IF of the journal in which they were published. The relationship was virtually inexistent, and my most frequently quoted papers were published in agronomic rather than in plant sciences journals. Conversely, restricting the analysis to the papers published within agronomic journals there was a relationship between the record of citations of the papers and the IF of the journals, particularly if the analysis is restricted to the most quoted papers in each journal. I then analyzed the cases of three other well-recognized crop scientists, to check whether the findings with my results were exceptional, and in the three cases results were remarkably similar. Therefore, it seems that the journal IF might be a valuable criterion for choosing the best journal in which to publish our best contributions only when comparing within agronomic journals, but not within combinations of agronomy and plant science journals. This should be also taken into account in evaluation processes when comparing scientists working in related but not identical fields. 相似文献
15.
对2011—2020年国内外重大植物疫情领域期刊论文和专利进行分析,深入了解植物疫情研究现状及前沿动态,以期为国内该领域创新发展、植物疫情防控体系构建提供有价值的参考。采用文献计量学方法对2011—2020年Web of Science核心数据集中国内外重大植物疫情领域国家、期刊、被引频次等进行梳理,由关键词分析得到研究前沿及热点,采用专利计量对地区分布及技术领域等进行分析。全球重大植物领域科技创新稳定发展,发文量和专利数持续上升。中国论文发表总量和专利数位居世界第一,但国际合作程度和论文篇均被引频次较低,国内高发文量作者数目较多但作者间国际合作程度较低。该领域研究热点主要集中在疫病识别及其防治,病虫害化学生态学如抗药性监测、农药风险评价,以及生物功能基因层面研究等方面。中国虽在该领域研发实力较强,但需加强国内外优势领域交流学习提高自身影响力,积极开展国际技术研究合作,为长期有效控制植物疫情发展提供有力支撑。 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Narongrit Sombatsompop Nongyao Premkamolnetr Teerasak Markpin Santi Ittiritmeechai Chatree Wongkaew Wutthisit Yochai Preeyanuch Ratchatahirun Lee Inn Beng 《Asia Pacific viewpoint》2011,52(2):207-218
This opinion article expresses two key viewpoints regarding the options for Association of South‐East Asian Nations (ASEAN) universities in pursuit of fulfilling the demand for greater research visibility and academic reputation. The first viewpoint outlines the importance of promoting research collaboration among ASEAN researchers and their international peers in increasing the visibility and impact of ASEAN research. The second viewpoint examines the ASEAN research characteristics, the challenges and existing best practices of its journal publishing landscape, the potential role of non‐ASEAN international journals in improving the profile of ASEAN research and explores the needs and benefits of establishing an ASEAN Integrated Journal Publishing Network (IJPN). It is through these combined approaches, we believe, that effective policy change, the standardisation of publishing structure, procedures, and systems to drive journal development, improvement of journal quality, and establishment of a consistent framework for measuring researcher performance will result. This article also includes a proposal for the IJPN structure and implementation plan, and highlights the key benefits of taking a collaborative approach to achieving this common goal. 相似文献