植物抗病激活蛋白harpinXooc防治水稻病害的研究

植物抗病激活蛋白harpinXooc由水稻条斑病细菌hrp基因簇中hpa1基因编码。用构建于表达载体pET21a（＋）上的hpa1诱导表达产物harpinXooc处理烟草，可激发烟草产生过敏反应，以及激活与烟草抗病信号途径相关的基因PR-1a、hin1和hsr203J的表达；处理水稻后，NPR1、OsPR1a、OsPR1b和PAL被激活。表明harpinXooc蛋白与植物互作后，通过水杨酸信号传导途径激活病程相关蛋白等防卫反应基因的转录表达，从而使植物产生系统获得抗病性。harpinXooc经加工后制成含量达1％的可溶性微颗粒制剂在水稻上进行应用，试验结果显示，harpinXooc蛋白可诱导水稻产生抗病性，防治水稻稻瘟病效果与杀菌剂稻瘟必克（三环唑）相当，防治水稻纹枯病和稻曲病效果与井冈霉素效果相当。对水稻增产的效果主要表现在增加粒实重上，增产达6％以上。     

青霉菌灭活菌丝体诱导烟草BY-2悬浮细胞防卫反应的初步研究

 青霉菌灭活菌丝体(Dry Mycelium of Penicillium chrysogenum,DMP)是工业生产青霉素的残余副产物,研究发现DMP能够提高多种作物的抗病性。本文研究了DMP对烟草BY-2悬浮细胞防卫反应的诱导作用,并初步探索其诱导机制,结果表明:DMP处理烟草BY-2悬浮细胞后,产生了活性氧迸发,在处理后30 min达到峰值;DMP诱导烟草BY-2悬浮细胞胞外基质碱性化,该变化能被蛋白激酶抑制剂K252a部分抑制;苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)和过氧化物酶(POD)的活性被诱导而明显升高,分别在处理后4 h和8 h达到峰值;DMP诱导了病程相关蛋白基因PR-1a、PR-1b以及抗病信号传导途径关键基因NPR1的表达。说明DMP能够诱导烟草BY-2悬浮细胞产生抗病防卫反应,其抗病信号可能是通过水杨酸信号途径进行传导的,蛋白质磷酸化参与了该抗病信号的传导过程。     

拟南芥的抗病信号传导途径

 拟南芥是研究植物与病原物相互作用的模式植物。植物感病和抗病取决于病原物无毒基因产物和寄主抗病基因产物的识别,以及随后的相关防卫反应的激活。在拟南芥的抗病过程中,水杨酸、茉莉酸、乙烯等信号分子都不同程度地参与着抗病过程中的不同环节,起着非常重要的作用。由于这些信号分子在对不同病原菌的抗性中的作用存在差异,因而将抗病信号传导分为依赖于水杨酸和依赖于茉莉酸/乙烯的途径。本文将着重讨论这些信号分子在植物系统获得抗性以及诱导系统抗性中的作用。     

植物诱导抗病性与诱抗剂研究进展

以糖、蛋白和糖蛋白三大类生物源激发子为重要的植物诱抗剂,本文分析了植物诱抗剂作用于植物后所发生的一系列信号识别与信号传导过程及植物典型的防卫反应,为植物诱抗剂的研发和植物诱导抗病性分子机理的探讨提供参考。     

植物抗病激活剂诱导植物抗病性的研究进展

植物抗病激活剂本身及其代谢物无直接的杀菌活性,但可刺激植物的免疫系统而诱导植物产生具有广谱性、持久性和滞后性的系统获得性抗病性能(SAR).植物抗病激活剂的诱导除了可以引起植物富含羟脯氨酸糖蛋白(HRGP)的变化,导致木质素在细胞壁沉积,使植物形成物理防御机制外,经植物抗病激活剂诱导后的植株能导致内源水杨酸(SA)的累积、形成氧化激增,植物局部细胞程序化死亡而产生过敏反应(HR),植物抗病激活剂诱导后产生的抗病信号经内源信号传导物质SA、茉莉酸(JA)、乙烯(Et)和一氧化氮(NO)可传导到达整个植株,经过一系列抗病相关基因的调控和表达可引起寄主防御酶系如苯丙氨酸解氨酶(PAL)、β-1,3-葡聚糖酶(β-1,3-glucanase)、几丁质酶(chitinase)、过氧化物酶(POX)等以及抗病物质如木质素与植保素等的变化及病程相关蛋白(PRP)的调控与表达.文中讨论了植物抗病激活剂概念和种类及其诱导抗病作用的主导机制,指出了植物抗病激活剂的应用前景和发展方向及使用和研究开发中可能存在的问题与对策.     

激发素与植物互作及抗病防卫信号传导

激发素是一类由疫霉属Phytophthora等真菌分泌的,可诱导茄科、十字花科等植物过敏性反应和系统获得抗病性的蛋白类激发子.激发素与植物的互作系统为研究植物抗病防卫信号传导途径提供了一个极好的模式.最近发现:激发素具有转移甾醇的活性,而形成甾醇和激发素复合物又是激发素与受体蛋白互作和激活抗病防卫信号传导途径的前提条件,也是对最近提出的病原激发子与受体互作"保卫假说"的支持.用125I标记法,找到了激发素的受体蛋白,由分子量约为160kD和50kD的2个亚基构成,被认为是Ca2 通道.在激发素激活的烟草抗病防卫信号传导途径中,蛋白质的磷酸化起着至关重要的作用,抑制蛋白激酶的活性,可阻止离子交换、活性氧进发、植保素合成等多种防卫反应;Ca2 参与诱导活性氧进发和植保素合成,活性氧进发与细胞死亡相关连,而植保素的合成与活性氧进发无关,过敏性反应对抗病防卫反应的建立不是必需的.激发素抗病基因工程在广谱抗病育种中具有广泛的应用前景.     

武夷菌素防治大豆菌核病的作用机制

武夷菌素是一种核苷类农用抗生素,具有高效、广谱、低毒等优点,对大豆菌核病具有良好的防治效果。武夷菌素防治大豆菌核病包括抑制核盘菌和诱导大豆抗病性两方面的作用。本文分别从核盘菌生长发育、生理毒性和基因表达三个层面介绍了武夷菌素抑制核盘菌的作用机制,同时,从植物防御过程中的胼胝质沉积、防御相关酶活变化和激素信号传导途径三方面综述了武夷菌素诱导大豆抗病的作用机制。此外,本文分析并展望了今后深入研究武夷菌素防治大豆菌核病作用机制的工作重点。     

植物系统获得抗病性与化学诱导抗病剂

植物系统获得抗病性被化学物质诱导而产生 ,本文对近年来的化学诱导抗病剂进行了简要评述     

β-葡寡糖诱导植物抗病性的研究进展

β-葡寡糖作为一种植物激发子,可高效诱导植物产生抗病性,因此被普遍认为是一种病原物相关的分子模式.其作用的发挥主要是通过与细胞膜上的受体相互识别,引起受体构象改变产生跨膜信号,再经过一系列的胞内信号传导,调控防卫基因的表达,积累次生代谢产物,诱导植物抗性来实现.诱抗活性不仅受到寡糖聚合度和化学修饰基团的影响,而且植物对于结构上有差异的β-葡寡糖激发子的识别也是大相径庭.本文就β-葡寡糖诱导植物产生抗病性的研究进展进行了综述.     

植物诱导抗病机制的研究进展

植物诱导抗病性是植物抵御病害侵染的重要机制,并且作为一种经济有效的抗病策略,在农林业可持续病害防控中具有广阔应用前景,受到人们的日益关注.从组织结构、生理生化乃至分子生物学的一系列变化,阐述了植物诱导产生抗病性的机制.同时,指出了植物诱导抗病性研究中有待进一步研究加以解决的问题和发展前景.     

BTH诱导花椰菜对菌核病的抗性研究

 利用苯并噻二唑BTH处理菌核病抗性不同的花椰菜品种幼苗, 采用营养生长期活体叶片菌丝块接种鉴定法评价菌核病抗性诱导效果,结果表明经BTH处理的植株菌核病病情指数明显下降, 对感病品种和抗病品种的诱抗效果分别达到81.5%和63.8%。对于花椰菜重要的防御酶活性变化研究结果表明,BTH诱导处理的花椰菜植株过氧化物酶（POD）、抗坏血酸酶( SOD )、过氧化氢酶（CAT）、苯丙氨酸解氨酶（PAL）和多酚氧化酶( PPO)的活性均有所提高。同时病程相关蛋白几丁质酶和β-1,3-葡聚糖酶的活性也增加。 利用半定量RT-PCR方法检测防御反应基因表达,结果表明BTH诱导首先激发了植株 PR-1等基因参与的水杨酸信号传导防御反应途径的发生,同时PDF1.2 基因的上调表达说明BTH诱导也影响了茉莉酸信号传导途径。     

蚜虫唾液主要成分及其在寄主和害虫互作中的作用

刺吸式害虫唾液里的某些成分通常是植物诱导反应中一些共有的或特异性诱导信号物质。本文综述了蚜虫取食、唾液的主要成分和取食诱发的植物防御信号传导途径,例如水杨酸途径、茉莉酸/乙烯途径,以及唾液诱导使植物防御因子上调效应的分子检测方法;同时还展望了蚜虫唾液研究的应用前景。     

水稻和稻瘟病菌互作中的信号传导及防御反应基因诱导表达的研究

 水稻和稻瘟病菌互作是研究植物与病原菌互作的模式体系。本文利用3个水稻抗稻瘟病近等基因品系(CO39、C101LAC和C101A51)和2个特异性菌株(M209和M210)构成不同亲和程度的互作关系,研究了稻瘟病菌对3个水稻信号传导途径关键酶合成基因、5个防御反应病程相关蛋白基因和1个防御反应转录因子调控基因诱导表达的作用。结果表明:稻瘟病菌诱导了各种互作关系中水稻OsLOX、OsAOS和OsPAL酶合成基因的表达,水稻启动了茉莉酸和水杨酸防御反应信号传导途径。在不亲和的互作反应中,稻瘟病菌能不同程度地诱导水稻OsPR1a、OsPR2、OsPR3-1、OsPR3-2和OsPR4基因的表达,从而有效激活了防御反应系统,使水稻植株表现为抗病;而在亲和的互作反应中,多数OsPR基因的表达水平低、时间短或没有表达,水稻植株表现为感病。OsMyb基因在各种互作关系中有不同的诱导表达。说明这些防御相关基因的诱导表达可能与水稻抗稻瘟病性相关。     

Induced Disease Resistance in Plants by Chemicals

Plants can be induced locally and systemically to become more resistant to diseases through various biotic or abiotic stresses. The biological inducers include necrotizing pathogens, non- pathogens or root colonizing bacteria. Through at network of signal pathways they induce resistance spectra and marker proteins that are characteristic for the different plant species and activation systems. The best characterized signal pathway for systemically induced resistance is SAR (systemic acquired resistance) that is activated by localized infections with necrotizing pathogens. It is characterized by protection against a broad range of pathogens, by a set of induced proteins and by its dependence on salicylic acid (SA) Various chemicals have been discovered that seem to act at various points in these defense activating networks and mimic all or parts of the biological activation of resistance. Of these, only few have reached commercialization. The best- studied resistance activator is acibenzolar-5-methyl (BION). At low rates it activates resistance in many crops against a broad spectrum of diseases, including fungi, bacteria and viruses. In monocots, activated resistance by BION typically is very long lasting, while the lasting effect is less pronounced in dicots. BION is translocated systemically in plants and can take the place of SA in the natural SAR signal pathway, inducing the same spectrum of resistance and the same set of molecular markers. Probenazole (ORYZEMATE) is used mainly on rice against rice blast and bacterial leaf blight. Its mode of action is not well understood partly because biological systems of systemically induced resistance are not well defined in rice. Treated plants clearly respond faster and in a resistant manner to infections by the two pathogens. Other compounds like beta-aminobutyric acid as wdl as extracts from plants and microorganisms have also been described as resistance inducers. For most of these, neither the mode of action nor reliable pre-challenge markers are known and still other pathways for resistance activation are suspected. Resistance inducing chemicals that are able to induce broad disease resistance offer an additional option for the farmer to complement genetic disease resistance and the use of fungicides. If integrated properly in plant health management programs, they can prolong the useful life of both the resistance genes and the fungicides presently used.     

小麦条锈病菌非亲和性小种诱发小麦抗锈性研究

 在水源11、洛夫林10等7个品种上分别选择小麦条锈菌CY17、CY28等9个生理小种中非亲和小种进行诱发接种,亲和小种为挑战小种。观察发病后的病情指数并与单独接种诱发小种和单独接种挑战小种处理的病情指数进行比较。证明诱发抗病现象是比较普遍的,但表现程度因小麦品种、诱发小种和挑战小种而不同。诱发抗病性的表达时间可持续8 d,以诱发接种后1~2 d表达最强。诱发接种量与诱发抗病性表达呈指数函数关系,也间接证明这种诱发抗性是局部的。作者认为:诱发抗病性在品种、诱发和挑战小种不同组合之间的差异在小种动态中会起一定的作用。     

外源ACC通过激活乙烯合成及信号转导诱导小豆抗锈性

大量研究表明, 乙烯可激发植物对死体营养型真菌的抗性, 但我们前期研究发现, 乙烯合成前体ACC可提高小豆对活体营养型真菌——锈菌的抗性, 为初步明确其机制, 本研究分析了ACC处理对小豆乙烯合成及信号转导的影响, 结果表明, ACC处理显著提高了乙烯合成基因VaACS1及信号通路关键基因VaEIN2?VaEIN3?VaERF5的表达水平?此外, ACC处理后再接种锈菌, 小豆锈病的发病程度显著降低?对接种锈菌后不同时间VaPR2和VaPR4的表达分析表明, 相比ACC处理后不接种对照, ACC处理后再接种锈菌的处理, 接种后1~5 d这两个基因表达量显著升高; 与水处理不接种锈菌相比, 水处理接种锈菌5~8 d后VaPR2和VaPR4的表达量虽显著上调, 但应答时间较ACC处理滞后, 且总体表达水平低, 表明ACC激活乙烯通路进而诱导防卫反应基因上调表达是其诱导小豆抗锈性的关键?     

新疆甜瓜对瓜类疫霉菌抗性的诱导

用弱致病的和灭活的瓜类疫霉菌 (Phytophthoramelonis)培养物成功地诱导了新疆甜瓜对瓜类疫霉病的整体抗性 ,抗性持续可达 2 1d ,同时探讨了不同处理方法对甜瓜诱导抗性的影响     

Molecular and biochemical mechanisms of defence induced in pea by Rhizobium leguminosarum against Orobanche crenata

Orobanche species (broomrapes) are parasitic weeds which dramatically decrease the yields of many economically important dicotyledonous crops, including pea (Pisum sativum), in Mediterranean areas. Previously, we identified some Rhizobium leguminosarum strains, including P.SOM, which could both promote pea development and significantly reduce infection by Orobanche crenata, notably through induction of necrosis of attached parasites. In the present study, induced resistance against broomrape in the nodulated pea was shown to be associated with significant changes in rates of oxidative lipoxygenase (Lox) and phenylpropanoid/isoflavonoid pathways and in accumulation of derived toxins, including phenolics and pisatin (pea phytoalexin). Changes were followed for 5 weeks after inoculation and attack by Orobanche. In contrast to non‐inoculated plants or Orobanche only infected plants, polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity and hydrogen peroxide content increased in response to bacteria inoculation indicating the involvement of oxidative processes. In parallel, the nodulated roots displayed high Lox activity related to the overexpression of the lox1 gene. Similarly, the expression of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and 6a‐hydroxymaackiain 3‐O‐methyltransferase (Hmm6a) genes were induced early during nodule development, suggesting the central role of the phenylpropanoid/isoflavonoid pathways in the elicited defence. As a consequence, the derived products, phenolics and pisatin, accumulated in response to rhizobacteria and conferred mechanical and chemical barriers to the invading parasite. These results highlight the likely role of signalling pathways in induced resistance and suggest these mechanisms should be enhanced through integrated Orobanche management practices.     

Altered Phenotypic Response to Peronospora parasitica in Brassica juncea Seedlings Following Prior Inoculation with an Avirulent or Virulent Isolate of Albugo candida

A study was made of the biological interactions between an isolate of Peronospora parasitica compatible with Brassica juncea and two isolates of Albugo candida either incompatible or compatible with the host species. Prior inoculation with the incompatible isolate of A. candida induced resistance to subsequently inoculated P. parasitica. The degree of resistance was proportional to the zoosporangia concentration of the incompatible isolate and induced resistance was more marked in the cotyledon receiving the inducing inoculum compared to the opposite cotyledon and subsequently emerging true leaves that had not been pre-inoculated. Induction of resistance was also observed if the incompatible isolate of A. candida and P. parasitica were co-inoculated simultaneously. However, the effect was greater the longer the interval between inoculations, up to a period of 4 days. When the incompatible isolate of A. candida was inoculated 4h after P. parasitica, there was no marked effect on resistance to the latter. In contrast, prior inoculation with the compatible isolate of A. candida increased susceptibility to P. parasitica inoculated subsequently. However, pre- or co-inoculation with P. parasitica suppressed the development of the compatible isolate of A. candida. A spectrum of responses was observed when one cotyledon was inoculated simultaneously with both the incompatible and compatible isolates of A. candida and followed subsequently with P. parasitica after different time intervals. In such combinations, a transition was observed in the host response to P. parasitica from induced resistance/reduced susceptibility, which increased up to 24h following a simultaneous inoculation with incompatible + compatible isolates of A. candida to an almost neutral reaction after 72h to induced susceptibility after 96h. This range of altered responses appeared to reflect the outcome of the differing kinetics and counter-effects of resistance and susceptibility induction.