Sedative effects of hydromorphone or oxymorphone with or without acepromazine in dogs

Hydromorphone is an agonist opioid with potency approximately five times that of morphine and half that of oxymorphone. The purpose of this study was to compare hydromorphone with oxymorphone, with or without acepromazine, for sedation in dogs, and to measure plasma histamine before and after drug administration. Ten dogs received IM hydromorphone (H; 0.2 mg kg^?1), oxymorphone (O; 0.1 mg kg^?1), hydromorphone with acepromazine (H; 0.2 mg kg^?1, A; 0.05 mg kg^?1) or oxymorphone with acepromazine (O; 0.1 mg kg^?1, A; 0.05 mg kg^?1) in a randomized Latin‐square design. Sedation score, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and SpO₂ were recorded at baseline and every 5 minutes after drug administration up to 25 minutes. Plasma histamine was measured at baseline and at 25 minutes post‐drug administration. Data were analyzed with repeated measures anova . Mean ± SD body weight was 21.62 ± 1.54 kg. Mean ± SD age was 1.07 ± 0.19 years. Sedation score was significantly greater for OA after 5 minutes than O alone (4.1 ± 3.5 versus 1.9 ± 1.5) and for HA after 15 minutes than H alone (8.6 ± 2.9 versus 5.9 ± 2.5). There was no significant difference in sedation between H and O at any time point. There was no significant difference between groups at any time with respect to heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure or SpO₂. Mean ± SD plasma histamine (nM ml^?1) for all groups was 1.72 ± 2.69 at baseline and 1.13 ± 1.18 at 25 minutes. There was no significant change in plasma histamine concentration in any group. Hydromorphone is effective for sedation in dogs and does not cause measurable increase in histamine. Sedation with hydromorphone is enhanced by acepromazine.     

Effects of acepromazine on the incidence of vomiting associated with opioid administration in dogs

Objective To evaluate the anti‐emetic properties of acepromazine in dogs receiving opioids as pre‐anesthetic medication. Study design Randomized prospective clinical study. Animals One hundred and sixteen dogs (ASA I or II), admitted for elective surgical procedures. The dogs were a mixed population of males and females, purebreds and mixed breeds, 0.25–13.4 years of age, weighing 1.8–57.7 kg. Methods A prospective clinical trial in which the dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups. All groups received acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^?1 intramuscularly (IM)). Group I received acepromazine 15 minutes prior to opioid administration. Group II received acepromazine in combination with the opioid. Group III received acepromazine 15 minutes after opioid administration. One of three different opioids was administered IM to each dog: morphine sulfate at 0.5 mg kg^?1; hydromorphone hydrochloride at 0.1 mg kg^?1; or oxymorphone hydrochloride at 0.075 mg kg^?1. Results Dogs receiving acepromazine before the opioid (group I) had a significantly lower incidence of vomiting (18%) than dogs in groups II (45%) and III (55%). The degree of sedation was significantly lower in the dogs receiving the combination of acepromazine and the opioid (group II) than in dogs receiving the opioid as the first drug (group III). Conclusions and clinical relevance Acepromazine administered 15 minutes before the opioid lowers the incidence of vomiting induced by opioids.     

Effects of acepromazine on the incidence of vomiting associated with opioid administration in dogs

Opioids used in the pre‐operative period may frequently induce vomiting. Acepromazine is commonly combined with opioids as a pre‐anesthetic drug, and has antiemetic properties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antiemetic properties of acepromazine in dogs receiving opioids as a pre‐anesthetic. One hundred and sixteen dogs (ASA I or II), 58 males and 58 females; purebreds and mixed breeds; 3 months?13.4 years of age; weighing 1.8–57.7 kg admitted for elective surgical procedures, were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. All groups received acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^?1 IM). Group I (n = 40) received acepromazine 15 minutes prior to opioid administration. Group II (n = 38) received acepromazine in combination with the opioid. Group III (n = 38) received acepromazine 15 minutes after opioid administration. One of the three different opioids was administered IM to each dog: morphine at 0.5 mg kg^?1, hydromorphone at 0.1 mg kg^?1, or oxymorphone at 0.075 mg kg^?1. Statistical analysis included a χ²‐test for the incidence of vomiting and a Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test for the sedation comparison between groups. The dogs receiving acepromazine before the opioid (Group I) had significantly lower incidence of vomiting (18%) than those in Groups II (45%) and III (55%). The degree of sedation assessed 15 minutes after administration of the last drug (s) in each group was significantly lower in the dogs receiving the combination of acepromazine and opioid (Group II) than in those receiving opioid as the first drug (Group III). Time to vomiting was less than 8 minutes in all groups. In conclusion, acepromazine administered 15 minutes before opioid reduces the incidence of vomiting induced by opioids.     

Epidural vs. Intramuscular Oxymorphone Analgesia after Thoracotomy in Dogs

Oxymorphone was administered epidurally (0.1 mg/kg) or intramuscularly (IM) (0.2 mg/kg) to 16 dogs undergoing thoracotomy, to compare the analgesic effectiveness. Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pain score were measured hourly. Arterial blood gases were measured at hour 1. A single dose of oxymorphone injected epidurally provided analgesia for up to 10 hours, whereas the IM route provided a comparable effect for less than 2 hours. There were statistically significant increases in heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures at hour 2 in the dogs treated IM over the dogs treated epidurally. We conclude that epidurally administered oxymorphone is highly effective in alleviating pain after thoracotomy in dogs and provides longer lasting analgesia than the IM route.     

Minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia after sedation with acepromazine or medetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy

ObjectiveTo determine the induction doses, then minimum infusion rates of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), and subsequent, cardiopulmonary effects, recovery characteristics and alfaxalone plasma concentrations in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy after premedication with butorphanol-acepromazine or butorphanol-medetomidine.Study designProspective randomized blinded clinical study.AnimalsTwenty-eight healthy cats.MethodsCats undergoing ovariohysterectomy were assigned into two groups: together with butorphanol [0.2 mg kg^?1 intramuscularly (IM)], group AA (n = 14) received acepromazine (0.1 mg kg^?1 IM) and group MA (n = 14) medetomidine (20 μg kg^?1 IM). Anaesthesia was induced with alfaxalone to effect [0.2 mg kg^?1 intravenously (IV) every 20 seconds], initially maintained with 8 mg kg^?1 hour^?1 alfaxalone IV and infusion adjusted (±0.5 mg kg^?1 hour^?1) every five minutes according to alterations in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f_R), Doppler blood pressure (DBP) and presence of palpebral reflex. Additional alfaxalone boli were administered IV if cats moved/swallowed (0.5 mg kg^?1) or if f_R >40 breaths minute^?1 (0.25 mg kg^?1). Venous blood samples were obtained to determine plasma alfaxalone concentrations. Meloxicam (0.2 mg kg^?1 IV) was administered postoperatively. Data were analysed using linear mixed models, Chi-squared, Fishers exact and t-tests.ResultsAlfaxalone anaesthesia induction dose (mean ± SD), was lower in group MA (1.87 ± 0.5; group AA: 2.57 ± 0.41 mg kg^?1). No cats became apnoeic. Intraoperative bolus requirements and TIVA rates (group AA: 11.62 ± 1.37, group MA: 10.76 ± 0.96 mg kg^?1 hour^?1) did not differ significantly between groups. Plasma concentrations ranged between 0.69 and 10.76 μg mL^?1. In group MA, f_R, end-tidal carbon dioxide, temperature and DBP were significantly higher and HR lower.Conclusion and clinical relevanceAlfaxalone TIVA in cats after medetomidine or acepromazine sedation provided suitable anaesthesia with no need for ventilatory support. After these premedications, the authors recommend initial alfaxalone TIVA rates of 10 mg kg^?1 hour^?1.     

Comparative cardiovascular, analgesic, and sedative effects of medetomidine, medetomidine–hydromorphone, and medetomidine–butorphanol in dogs

The purpose of this study was to determine the cardiovascular, analgesic, and sedative effects of IV medetomidine (M, 20 µg kg^?1), medetomidine–hydromorphone (MH, 20 µg kg^?1 ? 0.1 mg kg^?1), and medetomidine–butorphanol (MB, 20 µg kg^?1 ? 0.2 mg kg^?1) in dogs. Using a randomized cross‐over design and allowing 1 week between treatments, six healthy, mixed‐breed dogs (five males and one female) weighing 20 ± 3 kg, were induced to anesthesia by face‐mask administration of 2.9% ET sevoflurane to facilitate instrumentation prior to administration of the treatment combinations. Dogs were intubated and instrumented to enable measurement of heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure (PAOP), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary arterial temperature (TEMP), and cardiac output via thermodilution using 5 mL of 5% dextrose, and recording the average of the three replicate measurements. Cardiac index (CI) and systemic (SVR) and pulmonary vascular resistances were calculated. After instrumentation was completed, administration of sevoflurane was discontinued, and the dogs were allowed to recover for 30 minutes prior to administration of the treatment drugs. After collection of the baseline samples for blood gas analysis and recording the baseline cardiovascular variables, the test agents were administered IV over 10 seconds and the CV variables recorded at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post‐injection. In addition, arterial blood was sampled for blood gas analysis at 15 and 45 minutes following injection. Intensity and duration of analgesia (assessed by toe‐pinch response using a hemostat) and level of sedation were evaluated at the above time points and at 75 and 90 minutes post‐injection. Data were analyzed using anova for repeated measures with posthoc differences between means identified using Bonferroni's method (p < 0.05). Administration of M, MH, or MB was associated with increases in SAP, MAP, DAP, PAP, PAOP, CVP, SVR, and TEMP and with decreases in HR and CI. No differences in CV variables between treatment groups were identified at any time. PaO₂ increased over time in all groups and was significantly higher when MH was compared with M. At 45 minutes, PaO₂ tended to decrease over time and was significantly lower when MH and MB were compared with M at 15 minutes. Analgesia scores for MH and MB were significantly higher compared with M through 45 minutes, while analgesia scores for MH were significantly higher compared with M through 90 minutes. Sedation scores were higher for MH and MB compared with M throughout 90 minutes. Durations of lateral recumbency were 108 ± 10.8, 172 ± 15.5, and 145 ± 9.9 minutes for M, MH, and MB, respectively. We conclude that MH and MB are associated with improved analgesia and sedation and have similar CV effects when compared with M.     

Assessment of the effects of intramuscular administration of alfaxalone with and without medetomidine in Horsfield's tortoises (Agrionemys horsfieldii)

ObjectiveTo characterise four different intramuscular (IM) anaesthetic protocols, two with alfaxalone and two with alfaxalone in combination with medetomidine in terrestrial tortoises.Study designBlinded, randomized, cross‐over experimental study.AnimalsNine healthy adult male Horsfield's tortoises (Agrionemys horsfieldii).MethodsEach tortoise was randomly assigned to one of four different protocols: 1) 10 mg kg^?1 alfaxalone; 2) 10 mg kg^?1 alfaxalone + 0.10 mg kg^?1 medetomidine; 3) 20 mg kg^?1 alfaxalone; and 4) 20 mg kg^?1 alfaxalone + 0.05 mg kg^?1 medetomidine. During the experiment, the following variables were recorded: heart rate; respiratory rate; peripheral nociceptive responses; muscle strength; ability to intubate; palpebral, corneal and tap reflexes; and cloacal temperature.ResultsProtocols 1 and 2 resulted in moderate sedation with no analgesia, and moderate to deep sedation with minimal analgesia, respectively. Protocols 3 and 4 resulted in deep sedation or anaesthesia with variable analgesic effect; these two protocols had the longest total anaesthetic time and allowed intubation in 6/9 and 8/9 tortoises respectively. The total anaesthesia/sedation time produced by alfaxalone was significantly increased (p <0.05) by the addition of medetomidine. There were no significant differences regarding time to plateau phase and duration of plateau phase. Baseline heart rate of 53 ± 6 beats minute^?1 decreased significantly (p <0.05) with all protocols, and was lower (p <0.05) in protocols 3 and 4. Heart rate increased after atipamezole administration, but the increase was transient. In two tortoises, extreme bradycardia with no cardiac activity for 10 minutes was observed with protocols 3 and 4.Conclusion and clinical relevanceAlfaxalone 10 and 20 mg kg^?1 IM can be used for sedation for non‐painful procedures. Alfaxalone in combination with medetomidine can be used for deeper sedation or anaesthesia, but the observed respiratory and cardiovascular depression may limit its use.     

A preliminary investigation comparing pre-operative morphine and buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia and sedation in cats

Objective To compare the postoperative analgesic and sedative properties of buprenorphine and morphine in cats. Study Design Prospective, randomized, blinded study. Animals Thirty‐two domestic cats undergoing surgery. Methods Cats received pre‐anaesthetic medication with acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^?1) given intramuscularly and were randomly allocated to group M and given morphine (0.1 mg kg^?1) intramuscularly (IM) or to group B and given buprenorphine (0.01 mg kg^?1) IM. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with halothane in oxygen and nitrous oxide. Pain and sedation scores using visual analogue scales, and heart and respiratory rates, were measured immediately before, and 30, 60, 120, 180, 300 and 420 minutes after anaesthesia. Results Pain scores were significantly lower at 60, 120 and 180 minutes after anaesthesia in group B. Group B also had higher heart rates at 30 minutes. There were no other statistically significant differences between the groups. Clinical relevance Buprenorphine (0.01 mg kg^?1) appeared to provide better postoperative analgesia than morphine (0.1 mg kg^?1) and may also have a longer duration of action.     

Evaluation of the perioperative stress response in dogs administered medetomidine or acepromazine as part of the preanesthetic medication

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative stress response in dogs administered medetomidine or acepromazine as part of the preanesthetic medication. ANIMALS: 42 client-owned dogs that underwent elective ovariohysterectomy. PROCEDURE: Each dog was randomly allocated to receive medetomidine and butorphanol tartrate (20 microgram/kg and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively, IM) or acepromazine maleate and butorphanol (0.05 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively, IM) for preanesthetic medication. Approximately 80 minutes later, anesthesia was induced by administration of propofol and maintained by use of isoflurane in oxygen. Each dog was also given carprofen before surgery and buprenorphine after surgery. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, and beta-endorphin were measured at various stages during the perioperative period. In addition, cardiovascular and clinical variables were monitored. RESULTS: Concentrations of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol were significantly lower for dogs administered medetomidine. Concentrations of beta-endorphin did not differ between the 2 groups. Heart rate was significantly lower and mean arterial blood pressure significantly higher in dogs administered medetomidine, compared with values for dogs administered acepromazine. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that for preanesthetic medications, medetomidine may offer some advantages over acepromazine with respect to the ability to decrease perioperative concentrations of stress-related hormones. In particular, the ability to provide stable plasma catecholamine concentrations may help to attenuate perioperative activation of the sympathetic nervous system.     

The use of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy to provide post-operative analgesia in the dog

Buprenorphine is an effective analgesic when administered epidurally to humans. The purpose of this study was to compare epidural buprenorphine (B; n = 10) with epidural morphine (M; n = 10) for post‐operative analgesia in dogs undergoing cranial cruciate ligament repair. All dogs were premedicated with acepromazine (0.1 mg kg^?1 IM), induced with propofol (4–6 mg kg^?1 IV) and maintained with halothane in oxygen. Dogs were randomly assigned to receive B (0.004 mg kg^?1) or M (0.1 mg kg^?1) in the lumbosacral epidural space in a total volume of 0.2 mL kg^?1. End‐tidal halothane and CO₂ and temperature were recorded every 15 minutes until extubation (t = 0). A numerical rating pain score (SPS) was recorded at t = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours by a blinded observer. Dogs received rescue morphine (1.0 mg kg^?1 IM) if indicated by SPS and the time of rescue analgesic administration was recorded. Observable side‐effects such as urinary retention, sedation or pruritus were recorded. Data were analyzed with repeated measures anova . Mean ± SD body weight (kg) and age (yrs) for B dogs was 34.2 ± 10.8 and 5.5 ± 2.8; for M dogs these values were 36.6 ± 13.5 and 5.9 ± 3.3. Mean ± SD SPS for B dogs at t = 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours were 1.2 ± 0.75, 3.2 ± 2.0, 4.5 ± 4.3, 4.6 ± 3.4, 4.7 ± 3.0, 5.0 ± 4.9 and 5.1 ± 3.5. For M dogs these values were 1.7 ± 0.5, 2.6 ± 2.0, 3.7 ± 0.75, 4.2 ± 2.2, 4.1 ± 3.0, 3.1 ± 2.1 and 3.9 ± 1.9. There were no significant differences between B and M with respect to SPS, times or frequency of rescue morphine administration, end‐tidal halothane and CO₂, or esophageal temperature. Fifty per cent of dogs in both groups required rescue morphine. Buprenorphine is as effective as morphine for epidural analgesia in healthy dogs undergoing hindlimb orthopedic surgery.     

A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of epidurally administered medetomidine and xylazine in dogs

Alpha₂ agonists have a significant role in epidural anaesthetic techniques. However, there are few reports regarding epidural administration of these drugs especially in small animals ( Greene et al. 1995; Keegan et al. 1995; Vesal et al. 1996 ). This study compared the haemodynamic effects of xylazine and medetomidine after epidural injection in dogs. Six dogs (four females and two males) weighing 27.5 ± 3.39 kg, aged 5.6 ± 1.42 years were studied on two separate occasions one month apart. Dogs were sedated with 0.5 mg kg^?1 diazepam IM and 0.1 mg kg^?1 acepromazine IM. After 20 minutes, a lumbosacral epidural injection of 0.25 mg kg^?1 xylazine was administered (group X). One month later, following the same sedation, 15 µg kg^?1 medetomidine was administered epidurally (group M). Haemodynamic variables (ECG and indirect blood pressure (Doppler)), respiratory rate and rectal temperature were recorded before (baseline) and then every 5 minutes after the epidural injection, up to 60 minutes. Differences between groups were compared by a paired t‐test. Within group changes were compared to basal values by anova . A p‐value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Both groups showed significant reductions in heart rate (106.3 ± 7.7 beats minute^?1 baseline versus 67.7 ± 7.6 (group M); 91 ± 3.8 baseline versus 52.3 ± 9 (group X)) and mean arterial blood pressure (113.1 ± 12.3 mm Hg baseline versus 87 ± 11 (group M); 118 ± 7 baseline versus 91 ± 14 (group X)). There were no differences between groups in these variables. After epidural injection, first degree atrioventricular block was recorded significantly more often in group X (50% against 33%) but second degree block was significantly more frequent in group M (66% against 33%). Also 50% of dogs in group X and 66% in group M showed sinus arrest. Respiratory rate decreased significantly in both groups following the epidural injection (20.66 ± 0.66 minute^?1 baseline versus 16.33 ± 4.77 (group M); 37.66 ± 0.56 baseline versus 16.33 ± 1.81 group X), but no differences between groups were observed. Rectal temperature decreased significantly in group X (38.16 ± 0.21) with respect to the basal measurement (39.30 ± 0.14 °C). In group M, there was no significant reduction in temperature, however, no statistical difference in rectal temperature was found between groups. This study shows that 0.25 mg kg^?1 xylazine and 15 µg kg^?1 medetomidine produce similar, significant cardiovascular and respiratory changes following lumbosacral epidural administration in dogs.     

Effect of bupivacaine on epidural analgesia produced by xylazine or medetomidine in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)

ObjectiveTo evaluate and compare the effect of epidural bupivacaine on analgesia produced by epidural xylazine or medetomidine in buffaloes.Study designProspective, blinded study.AnimalsTen male buffalo calves (6-8 months of age; body weight 70-90 kg) were used on two occasions to conduct a total of 20 investigations.MethodsCaudal extradural analgesia was produced in four buffalo calves each by the injection of either xylazine (0.05 mg kg^?1), medetomidine (15 μg kg^?1) or 0.5% bupivacaine (0.125 mg kg^?1), or combinations of xylazine and bupivacaine (0.05 and 0.125 mg kg^?1), or medetomidine and bupivacaine (15 μg kg^?1 and 0.125 mg kg^?1) at the first intercoccygeal extradural space. Analgesia was tested using deep pinprick stimuli.ResultsExtradural administration of xylazine or medetomidine resulted in complete analgesia of the tail, perineum, inguinal region and the upper parts of the hind limbs, which was faster in onset and longer in duration in the medetomidine group than in the xylazine group. Addition of bupivacaine increased the intensity of the analgesia produced by xylazine, but not that produced by medetomidine. All the drugs caused mild to moderate ataxia, but signs of sedation were apparent only in animals which received xylazine or medetomidine. The extradural injections of all the drugs caused significant decrease in heart rate (p = 0.024), respiratory rate (p = 0.026) and rectal temperature (p = 0.036) from the respective baseline values, but the differences between the groups were not significant.ConclusionsMedetomidine produced a longer duration of analgesia than that produced by xylazine. Bupivacaine prolonged the analgesia produced by xylazine, but the analgesia produced by the combination of medetomidine and bupivacaine was not superior to that produced by medetomidine alone.Clinical relevanceBupivacaine may be used to prolong the extradural analgesia produced by xylazine, but not that produced by medetomidine in buffaloes.     

Post-operative analgesic effects of butorphanol or firocoxib administered to dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy

ObjectiveTo compare the post-operative analgesic effects of butorphanol or firocoxib in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.Study designProspective, randomized, blinded, clinical trial.AnimalsTwenty-five dogs >1 year of age.MethodsDogs received acepromazine intramuscularly (IM), 0.05 mg kg^?1 and either butorphanol IM, 0.2 mg kg^?1 (BG, n = 12) or firocoxib orally (PO), 5 mg kg^?1 (FG, n = 13), approximately 30 minutes before induction of anesthesia with propofol. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. Ovariohysterectomy was performed by the same surgeon. Pain scores using the dynamic and interactive visual analog scale (DIVAS) were performed before and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 20 hours after the end of surgery by one observer, blinded to the treatment. Rescue analgesia was provided with morphine (0.5 mg kg^?1) IM and firocoxib, 5 mg kg^?1 (BG only) PO if DIVAS > 50. Groups were compared using paired t-tests and Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± SD.ResultsThe BG required significantly less propofol (BG: 2.6 ± 0.59 mg kg^?1; FG: 5.39 ± 0.7 mg kg^?1) (p < 0.05) but the anesthesia time was longer (BG: 14 ± 6, FG: 10 ± 4 minutes). There were no differences for body weight (BG: 7.9 ± 5.0, FG: 11.5 ± 4.6 kg), sedation scores, and surgery and extubation times (BG: 10 ± 2, 8 ± 5 minutes; FG: 9 ± 3, 8 ± 4 minutes, respectively) (p > 0.05). The FG had significantly lower pain scores than the BG at 1, 2 and 3 hours following surgery (p < 0.05). Rescue analgesia was administered to 11/12 (92%) and 2/13 (15%) dogs in the BG and FG, respectively (p < 0.05).Conclusion and clinical relevanceFirocoxib produced better post-operative analgesia than butorphanol. Firocoxib may be used as part of a multimodal analgesia protocol but may not be effective as a sole analgesic.     

Cardiovascular effects of a proprietary l-methadone/fenpipramide combination (Polamivet) alone and in addition to acepromazine in healthy Beagle dogs

ObjectiveTo determine the cardiovascular effects of a proprietary l-methadone/fenpipramide combination (Polamivet) alone and in addition to acepromazine in dogs.Study designProspective, randomized, experimental crossover study.AnimalsFive adult healthy Beagle dogs (one male and four females, weighing 12.8–16.4 kg).MethodsDogs were instrumented for haemodynamic measurements whilst anaesthetized with isoflurane. Three hours after recovery dogs received 0.025 mg kg^?1 acepromazine (AP) or saline (SP) IM followed by 0.5 mg kg^?1L-methadone/ 0.025 mg kg^?1 fenpipramide IV after 30 minutes. Cardiac output using thermodilution, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), haemoglobin concentration, arterial and mixed-venous blood gas analysis were measured and sedation evaluated at baseline (BL), 30 minutes after acepromazine or saline IM (A/S), 5 minutes after L-methadone/fenpipramide IV application (35), every 15 minutes for 1 hour (50, 65, 80, 95 minutes) and every hour until baseline cardiac output was regained. Standard cardiovascular parameters were calculated. Data were analyzed by repeated measures anova and paired t-tests with p < 0.05 considered significant.ResultsBaseline measurements did not differ. Cardiac index decreased after acepromazine administration in treatment AP (p = 0.027), but was not significantly influenced after l-methadone/fenpipramide injection in either treatment. In both treatments heart rate did not change significantly over time. Stroke volume index increased after A/S in both treatments (p = 0.049). Systemic vascular resistance index, MAP, CVP, MPAP, and pulmonary vascular resistance index did not change significantly after either treatment and did not differ between treatments. Dogs were deeply sedated in both treatments with a longer duration in treatment AP.Conclusions and clinical relevanceIn healthy dogs the dose of l-methadone/fenpipramide used in this study alone and in combination with acepromazine induced deep sedation without significant cardiovascular changes.     

Effect of intravenous propofol and remifentanil on heart rate, blood pressure and nociceptive response in acepromazine premedicated dogs

ObjectiveTo investigate the cardiorespiratory, nociceptive and endocrine effects of the combination of propofol and remifentanil, in dogs sedated with acepromazine.Study designProspective randomized, blinded, cross-over experimental trial.AnimalsTwelve healthy adult female cross-breed dogs, mean weight 18.4 ± 2.3 kg.MethodsDogs were sedated with intravenous (IV) acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^?1) followed by induction of anesthesia with IV propofol (5 mg kg^?1). Anesthesia was maintained with IV propofol (0.2 mg kg^?1 minute^?1) and remifentanil, infused as follows: R1, 0.125 μg kg^?1 minute^?1; R2, 0.25 μg kg^?1 minute^?1; and R3, 0.5 μg kg^?1 minute^?1. The same dogs were administered each dose of remifentanil at 1-week intervals. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (f_R), end tidal CO₂ (Pe′CO₂), arterial hemoglobin O₂ saturation, blood gases, and rectal temperature were measured before induction, and 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 120 minutes after beginning the infusion. Nociceptive response was investigated by electrical stimulus (50 V, 5 Hz and 10 ms). Blood samples were collected for plasma cortisol measurements. Statistical analysis was performed by anova (p < 0.05).ResultsIn all treatments, HR decreased during anesthesia with increasing doses of remifentanil, and increased significantly immediately after the end of infusion. MAP remained stable during anesthesia (72–98 mmHg). Antinociception was proportional to the remifentanil infusion dose, and was considered satisfactory only with R2 and R3. Plasma cortisol concentration decreased during anesthesia in all treatments. Recovery was smooth and fast in all dogs.Conclusions and clinical relevanceInfusion of 0.25–0.5 μg kg^?1 minute^?1 remifentanil combined with 0.2 mg kg^?1 minute^?1 propofol produced little effect on arterial blood pressure and led to a good recovery. The analgesia produced was sufficient to control the nociceptive response applied by electrical stimulation, suggesting that it may be appropriate for performing surgery.     

A comparison of extradural and intravenous methadone on intraoperative isoflurane and postoperative analgesia requirements in dogs

Objective To compare the effects of intravenous (IV) and extradural (ED) methadone on end‐tidal isoflurane concentration (Fe ′ISO) and postoperative analgesic requirements in dogs undergoing femoro‐tibial joint surgery. Study Design Randomized, blinded, clinical study. Animals Twenty‐four healthy client‐owned dogs undergoing surgical repair of ruptured cruciate ligaments. Methods Dogs were randomly assigned to two groups of 12 animals and received either ED or IV methadone (0.3 mg kg^?1 diluted with saline to 0.2 mL kg^?1). Pre‐anaesthetic medication was IV acepromazine (0.05 mg kg^?1). Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained initially with an Fe ′ISO of 1.0% delivered in oxygen. Methadone was injected with the dogs in sternal recumbency; the observer was unaware of the administration route. At 10 minutes (stimulation 1) and 20 minutes (stimulation 2) after methadone administration pelvic limb reflexes were tested by digit‐clamping. The time at skin incision (stimulation 3), joint‐capsule incision (stimulation 4), tibial tuberosity drilling (stimulation 5), fabellar suturing (stimulation 6) and extracapsular tightening (stimulation 7) were noted. Changes in heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate and arterial blood pressure associated with surgery were recorded along with the corresponding Fe ′ISO. After 20 minutes of anaesthesia, Fe ′ISO was decreased to the minimum required to maintain stable anaesthesia. Immediately after tracheal extubation, 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours postoperatively and on the morning after surgery, the degree of pain present was assessed using a numerical rating scale. The HR, respiratory rates and blood pressure were also recorded at these times. Serum cortisol and blood glucose concentrations were measured before pre‐anaesthetic medication and at each postoperative pain scoring interval except at 1 and 2 hours. Ketoprofen (2 mg kg^?1), carprofen (4 mg kg^?1) or meloxicam (0.2 mg kg^?1) were given by subcutaneous injection whenever pain scoring indicated moderate discomfort was present. Results Controlled ventilation was required in six dogs which stopped breathing after IV methadone. The median Fe ′ISO at stimulus 5 was 1.0% in the IV and 0.83% in the ED group. At stimulus 6, Fe ′ISO was 1.0% in the IV and 0.8% in the ED group; the difference was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). There was no significant difference in the duration of postoperative analgesia associated with administration route. Conclusions Extradural methadone significantly reduces the isoflurane requirement compared with IV methadone during femoro‐tibial joint surgery in dogs. Clinical relevance Extradural methadone provides safe and effective pain relief in dogs undergoing cruciate ligament repair.     

Effects of pre‐operative administration of medetomidine on plasma insulin and glucose concentrations in healthy dogs and dogs with insulinoma

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of medetomidine on plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in dogs with insulinoma and in healthy dogs undergoing anesthesia and surgery.AnimalsTwenty–five dogs with insulinoma and 26 healthy dogs.MethodsIn dogs with insulinoma, medetomidine (5 μg kg^?1) was randomly included (n = 12) or omitted (n = 13) from the pre–anesthetic medication protocol, which typically contained an opioid and an anticholinergic. Healthy dogs received medetomidine (5 μg kg^?1; n = 13) or acepromazine (0.04 mg kg^?1; n = 13) plus an opioid (morphine 0.5 mg kg^?1) and an anticholinergic (atropine 0.04 mg kg^?1) as pre–anesthetic medications. Pre–anesthetic medications were given intramuscularly. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were measured before (sample 1) and 30 minutes after pre–anesthetic medication (sample 2), and at the end of surgery in dogs with insulinoma or at 2 hours of anesthesia in healthy dogs (sample 3). Glucose requirement to maintain intra–operative normoglycemia in dogs with insulinoma was quantified and compared. Data were analyzed with anova and Bonferroni post–test, t–tests or chi–square tests as appropriate with p < 0.05 considered significant. Data are shown as mean ± SD.ResultsMedetomidine significantly decreased plasma insulin concentrations and increased plasma glucose concentrations in healthy dogs and those with insulinoma. These variables did not change significantly in the dogs not receiving medetomidine. In the dogs with insulinoma, intra–operative glucose administration rate was significantly less in the animals that received medetomidine compared to those that did not.ConclusionsPre–anesthetic administration of medetomidine significantly suppressed insulin secretion and increased plasma glucose concentration in dogs with insulinoma and in healthy dogs undergoing anesthesia and surgery.Clinical relevanceThese findings support the judicious use of medetomidine at low doses as an adjunct to the anesthetic management of dogs with insulinoma.