Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and complement fixation test for detecting Brucella ovis antibodies in sheep

A solid-phase, indirect, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was compared with the microtitre complement fixation test for detecting Brucella ovis antibodies in 220 ram sera. The ELISA was more sensitive than the complement fixation test; it demonstrated antibodies in 11 sera from known infected or vaccinated rams that were complement fixation test negative. No false positives were recorded with the ELISA and, in 36 sera positive to both tests, the ELISA titres were consistently higher than the corresponding complement fixation test titres.     

Comparison of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with the complement fixation test (CFT) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis

Complement fixation and ELISA tests were carried out on 8772 bovine sera. Results showed that ELISA titres were, on average, approximately sixteen times higher than the corresponding C.F. titres. The specificity of ELISA appeared comparable to that of the C.F.T. There was no evidence to show that the ELISA could detect infection earlier than the C.F.T.     

Comparison of the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with the complement fixation test (CFT) for the serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis

Complement fixation and ELISA tests were carried out on 8772 bovine sera. Results showed that ELISA titres were, on average, approximately sixteen times higher than the corresponding C.F. titres. The specificity of ELISA appeared comparable to that of the C.F.T. There was no evidence to show that the ELISA could detect infection earlier than the C.F.T.     

The complement fixation test for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams

Complement fixation tests using three B. ovis antigen preparations in warm fixation tests (WCFT) and cold fixation (CCFT) tests were done on 541 ram sera. Semen samples from the same rams were examined culturally to identify B. ovis excretors. The CCFT, using an antigen prepared by heat extraction of B.ovis cells, had a sensitivity of 97% in 124 rams which were shedding B.ovis. The specificity was 99% in 144 rams from non-infected flocks. Seventy-seven per cent of 156 rams which reacted to this test were shedding B. ovis in their semen. Tests with other antigens were inferior in sensitivity and/or specificity. The WCFT gave lower titres than CCFT. Vaccination caused large numbers of false positive reactions in 4 flocks.     

Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serum neutralisation test for the serodiagnosis of Aujeszky's disease

The serum neutralisation test (SNT) and the indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for Aujeszky's disease were compared, utilising 3202 sera from Aujeszky's disease free pig herds, and 304 SNT reactor and 245 non-reactor sera from Aujeszky's disease infected piggeries. ELISA was found to give good discrimination between positive and negative sera, results showing 96.9% and 99.7% agreement with the SNT in classifying positive and negative reactor pigs respectively. The ELISA appeared to detect a slightly higher proportion of reactors than did the SNT. Absorbance values obtained with ELISA showed a high degree of overall correlation with SW titres (r = 0.916), though correlations were lower when applied to individual sera. The ELISA was considered to be a rapid and convenient procedure, offering many advantages over the SNT for routine use.     

Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies and a complement fixation test for cattle vaccinated and infected with Brucella abortus

A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a monoclonal antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase MA(A) and a complement fixation test (CFT) were applied to sera collected over a two-year period from 60 cattle challenged with Brucella abortus strain 544. Forty-eight of the cattle were previously vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19 (S19) or B. abortus strain 45/20 (45/20). After challenge 33 of the cattle remained uninfected and nine of the 27 infected cattle showed aberrant reactions by the CFT. The performance of the MA(A) ELISA was as follows: after vaccination, the MA(A) ELISA, like the CFT, was unable to differentiate infected cattle from those recently vaccinated with S19. After challenge the MA(A) ELISA gave results comparable with the CFT for those cattle with aberrant reactions. For the non-infected cattle there was a similar number of weeks after challenge when both tests were negative. It is suggested that the main advantage of the MA(A) ELISA when compared with the CFT lies in its relatively simple test procedure.     

Comparison of complement fixation test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of early infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae

The relative merits of the complement-fixation test (CF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of the early antibody response to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae were evaluated. Discriminant analysis, a statistical procedure, was used to avoid difficulties associated with variation in background color and nonspecific reactions obtained with ELISA with different sera. Specific-pathogen-free pigs were exposed by contact to other specific-pathogen-free pigs which had been inoculated with M hyopneumoniae intratracheally (experiment A) or intranasally (experiment B) 18 to 21 days previously. Sera were collected from each pig before contact exposure and once a week until necropsy. Antibodies were detected by CF at postexposure (PE) week 3 in animals in experiment A (6 of 18) and at PE week 5 in experiment B (3 of 12). The ELISA antibodies were detected at 2 weeks after beginning of contact exposure in experiments A (4 of 18) and B (1 of 12). Examination of pooled data for experiments A and B indicated that ELISA was substantially (P less than 0.05) more sensitive for detection of antibodies than was the CF test at 3 to 5 weeks after contact exposure began. At PE weeks 6 and 7, both tests were similarly effective in detecting M hyopneumoniae antibodies.     

Performance of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams

AIM: To describe the performance characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams. METHODS: Sera from a negative (n = 2535) and a positive (n = 589) reference population were tested in an ELISA for anti-B. ovis antibodies and cut-off values calculated from the raw, log10-transformed and fitted data. Statistical methods were used to fit curves to the frequency distribution of the data and receiver-operated characteristics analysis used to optimise the cut-off values. RESULTS: Analysis of the frequency distribution of the positive ELISA values suggested a normal distribution of the data, whereas, in the case of the negative population, a Pearson type IV curve appeared to best fit the data. The cut-off values calculated as the mean plus 1.96 standard deviations (s.d.) from the raw, log-transformed and fitted ELISA data did not differ markedly. The differences were much greater at the mean plus 3.09 s.d. cut-off, with the cut-off value calculated from the log-transformed data giving a much better estimate of specificity. Optimisation (minimisation of classification error) of the cut-off calculated from the fitted curves suggested varying cut-off values, depending on the prevalence of B. ovis infection. Discussion: Calculation of cut-off values from curves that were fitted from the observed data give more accurate estimations of the performance characteristics of an assay than traditional calculations from observed values. They also allow the calculation of optimal cut-off values taking into account the prevalence of B. ovis infection and give additional information about the performance of the assay at cut-off values varied according to the epidemiological situation.     

Comparison of the complement fixation test and competitive ELISA for serodiagnosis of Anaplasma marginale infection in experimentally infected steers

OBJECTIVE: To compare sensitivity of a complement fixation (CF) test and competitive ELISA (cELISA) for detection of Anaplasma marginale in experimentally infected steers. ANIMALS: 40 crossbred (Angus-Simmental) steers. PROCEDURES: Steers were inoculated with 2.6 x 10(9) A marginale-infected erythrocytes (day 0). Blood samples were collected on days 9, 13, 20, 28, 34, 41, 61, 96, 126, and 156 days after inoculation. The percentage of parasitized erythrocytes (PPE) was determined by microscopic examination of stained blood films, and sera were evaluated with the CF test and cELISA by use of USDA-approved methods. Sensitivity and agreement (kappa statistic) between the 2 methods were determined. Persistent infections were confirmed by inoculation of blood obtained from infected steers into susceptible, splenectomized calves. RESULTS: 9 days after inoculation, sensitivity of the cELISA was 47.5%, whereas the CF test failed to identify seropositive steers. After day 13, sensitivity of the cELISA and CF test was 100% and 20%, respectively. During peak parasitemia (day 20), sensitivity of the cELISA and CF test was 100%. Thereafter, sensitivity of the CF test fluctuated between 7.5% and 37.5%, whereas sensitivity of the cELISA remained at 100%. Overall sensitivity of the cELISA and CF test was 94.8% and 26.5%, respectively (kappa statistic, 0.039). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cELISA had superior sensitivity for serologic detection of A marginale.The CF test and cELISA each had a high percentage of false-negative results during the prepatent period. These findings are relevant for export certification and anaplasmosis prevention or eradication programs.     

Species-specific serodiagnosis of equine piroplasma infections by means of complement fixation test (CFT), immunofluorescence (IIF), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The increasing horse trade requires a reliable immunodiagnosis of equine piroplasma infections due to import restrictions imposed by various countries, including the United States of America. It was the aim of our investigations to establish the suitability of serological tests for the detection of parasite carriers and, eventually, to differentiate between Babesia caballi and B. equi infections. The investigations were carried out on 11 ponies with experimentally-induced B. caballi and/or B. equi infection. The infections were confirmed by the demonstration of parasites in blood smears 2-13 days post infection (PI). The complement fixation test (CFT), the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were employed for the demonstration of antibodies, and different antigen preparations were tested for their suitability. Antibodies could be demonstrated by all three tests. Complement-fixing antibodies disappear after 2-3 months PI in B. caballi-infected horses, while the IIF and ELISA gave positive results during latent infection. A reliable serodiagnosis thus requires the use of the CFT and IIF, since parasite carriers may appear seronegative by the CFT. Serological differentiation between B. caballi and B. equi was possible by CFT and, to a certain extent, by IIF during early infection, but not by ELISA. The successful treatment of B. caballi infections with Berenil could only be confirmed serologically by IIF.     

The complement fixation test for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams--an Animal Health Division Report

Complement fixation tests using three B. ovis antigen preparations in warm fixation tests (WCFT) and cold fixation (CCFT) tests were done on 541 ram sera. Semen samples from the same rams were examined culturally to identify B. ovis excretors. The CCFT, using an antigen prepared by heat extraction of B. ovis cells, had a sensitivity of 97% in 124 rams which were shedding B.ovis. The specificity was 99% in 144 rams from non-infected flocks. Seventy-seven per cent of 156 rams which reacted to this test were shedding B. ovis in their semen. Tests with other antigens were inferior in sensitivity and/or specificity. The WCFT gave lower titres than CCFT. Vaccination caused large numbers of false positive reactions in 4 flocks.     

Use of the double immuno gel diffusion test and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to distinguish false from true reactors in the complement fixation test for Brucella ovis

A gel diffusion test with sonicated Brucella ovis antigen and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on heat-extracted antigen were used to distinguish false from true reactions in a complement fixation test based on heat-extracted antigen. Of 142 complement fixing reactors (occurring in supposedly Brucella ovis-free, accredited flocks), the gel diffusion test correctly identified the status of 139 animals as compared to 128 with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A combination of the two methods resulted in a correct identification of 141 animals. The procedures provide an easy, cheap and quick way to determine the true status of reactors that show up during routine use of the complement fixation test in Brucella ovis re-accreditation procedures.     

Comparative evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the serodiagnosis of dourine

The detection of antibodies against Trypanosoma equiperdum in 689 equid sera was compared by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the complement fixation test (CFT) and an indirect immunofluorescent test (IIF). CFT was the least sensitive technique, susceptible to anti-complementary factors and the most technically demanding. IIF was more sensitive, but was only suitable for testing limited numbers of samples. In this study, ELISA was the most sensitive test, the least labour intensive and lends itself to a considerable degree of automation. It is suggested that ELISA would be relatively easy to standardise between laboratories and an ELISA protocol could be adopted as the internationally approved test for equine health certification.     

Comparison of the dot-immunobinding assay with the complement fixation test for the detection of Brucella antibodies in sheep

A dot-immunobinding assay (DIA), using as antigen a sonic extract of Brucella abortus dotted on nitrocellulose bound to a plastic strip, was employed for the detection of Brucella antibodies in 666 sheep sera. The results were compared with the complement fixation test (CFT). All the 242 sera belonging to two flocks were found to be negative by DIA. CFT was negative in 239 cases, whereas three samples showed anti-complementary activity. Of the 424 sera from the remaining three flocks, 98 were positive by both tests and six were positive in DIA, but negative in CFT. In addition, 14 of the 19 anti-complementary sera were also positive by DIA.     

Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for serodiagnosis of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis infection, with results of a preliminary survey

An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) procedure was evaluated against the serum neutralisation test (SNT) for the detection of antibodies to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (bovine herpesvirus type l), using 2028 sera from 166 dairy and 172 beef cattle herds. The results showed the ELISA to give high levels of agreement with the SNT in classifying positive and negative sera (98% and 97% respectively). Such disagreements as did occur involved weakly reactive sera with SNT titres of % or less. A number of sera (n=123) with trace neutralising activity of doubtful diagnostic significance were found to give marginal reactivity with ELISA. ELISA absorbance values were found to be highly correlated with SNT titres (r=0.909) on an overall basis, though agreements were lower with individual sera. The ELISA procedure was quicker, cheaper, and detected more reactors than the SNT. It also allowed results to be obtained with a number of sera which were unsuitable for testing by SNT because of their cytotoxic nature. Analysis of ELISA results showed reactors to be present in 57% of tested sera, representing 81% of cattle herds. Reactor rates for sera and herds in the South Island, (37% and 58%), were significantly lower than for those in the North Island (64% and 88%). Antibody prevalence was also found to be significantly lower in districts having a low annual rainfall (<850 mm), and to be lower in beef cattle than in dairy cattle. A surprising exception to the latter occurred in low rainfall districts, where dairy cattle showed significantly lower reactor rates than local beef animals.     

Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis infection in rams.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibody to Brucella ovis was compared with a standard complement fixation test. Sera of 176 rams from uninfected flocks gave 175 negative and one suspect ELISA reaction (diagnostic specificity 99.4%) whereas the complement fixation test yielded 167 negative, seven suspect and two anticomplementary reactions (diagnostic specificity of 96.0%). Diagnostic sensitivity was evaluated on sera of 79 rams from which B. ovis had been isolated. The ELISA showed 75 positive and four suspect reactions, while complement fixation test revealed 64 positive, 13 suspect and two negative results. Considering both positive and suspect reactions, the diagnostic sensitivity was 100% for ELISA and 97.5% for complement fixation test. The ELISA method was considered more specific, more sensitive and technically more advantageous than complement fixation test as a serodiagnostic test for B. ovis infection in rams.