Exchangeable cations and CEC determinations of some highly weathered soils

Abstract

Eight methods to determine exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were compared for some highly weathered benchmark soils of Alabama. The methods were: (1) 1N NH₄OAc at pH 7.0 by replacement (for CEC only), (2) 1N NH₄OAc at pH 7.0 (summation of basic cations plus 1N KCl extractable Al), (3) 1N NH₄OAc at pH 7.0 (summation of basic cations plus exchangeable H⁺), (4) 0.1M BaCl₂ (summation of basic cations plus exchangeable Mn, Fe and Al), (5) Mehlich 1 (summation of basic cations plus 1N KCl extractable Al), (6) Mehlich 1 (summation of basic cations plus exchangeable H⁺), (7) Mehlich 3 (summation of basic cations plus 1N KCl extractable Al), and (8) Mehlich 3 (summation of basic cations plus exchangeable H⁺). The 0.1M BaCl₂ was chosen as the standard method for the highly weathered soils and the other methods compared to it. The results indicated that the 1N NH₄OAc replacement method gave significantly higher CEC values compared to the summation methods. This was probably due to the overestimation of the field CEC caused by measurement of pH dependent cation exchange sites in these soils. There was, however, close agreement between the BaCl₂ method and the summation methods that included extractable Al. The generally good agreement between these summation methods suggests that the Mehlich 1 and Mehlich 3 extractants, commonly used to determine available nutrients in the southeastem USA, may also be used to measure effective CEC of some acid‐rich sesquioxide benchmark soils of Alabama. However, 1N KCl extractable Al as opposed to exchangeable H⁺ should be included in the computation.     

Cation exchange capacity measurements

Abstract

Soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) measurements are important criteria for soil fertility management, vaste disposal on soils, and soil taxonomy. The objective of this research was to compare CEC values for arable Ultisols from the humid region of the United States as determined by procedures varying widely in their chemical conditions during measurement. Exchangeable cation quantities determined in the course of two of the CEC procedures were also evaluated. The six procedures evaluated were: (1) summation of N NH₄OAc (pH 7.0) exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, and Na plus BaCl₂ ‐ TEA (pH 8.0) exchangeable acidity; (2) N Ca(OAc)₂ (pH 7.0) saturation with Mg(OAc)₂ (pH 7.0) displacement of Ca²⁺; (3) N NH₄OAc (pH 7.0) saturation with NaCl displacement of NH₄ ⁺; (4) N MgCl₂ saturation with N KCl displacement of Mg²⁺; (5) compulsive exchange of Mg²⁺ for Ba²⁺; and (6) summation of N NH₄OAc (pH 7.0) exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, and Na plus N KCl exchangeable AJ. The unbuffered procedures reflect the pH dependent CEC component to a greater degree than the buffered methods. The compulsive exchange and the summation of N NH₄OAc exchangeable cations plus N KCl exchangeable Al procedures gave CEC estimates of the same magnitude that reflect differences in soil pH and texture. The buffered procedures, particularly the summation of N NH₄OAc exchangeable cations plus BaCl₂ ‐ TEA (pH 8.0) exchangeable acidity, indicated inflated CEC values for these acid Ultisols that are seldom limed above pH 6.5. Exchangeable soil Ca and Mg levels determined from extraction with 0.1 M BaCl₂ were consistently greater than values for the N NH₄Oac (pH 7.0) extractions. The Ba²⁺ ion is apparently a more efficient displacing agent than the NH₄ ⁺ ion. Also, the potential for dissolving unreacted limestone is greater for the Ba₂ ⁺ procedures than in the NH₄ ⁺ extraction.     

A simple rapid method for the measurement of exchangeable cations and effective cation exchange capacity

Abstract

A simple single‐extraction procedure for measuring exchangeable cations and effective CEC (ECEC, the CEC at natural pH and ionic strength) has been developed for routine advisory soil analysis. The method is based on the use of Sr (1.26M SrCl₂) to displace exchangeable cations and effective CEC is taken as the sum of the exchangeable cations. A ten minute shaking time at 5 g:80 ml, soil solution ratio, was found to be optimum. Good agreement was found between the proposed method and the standard neutral IN ammonium acetate leaching procedure with correlation coefficients (r) for the individual cations Mg, Ca, Na and K of 0.99***, 0.99***, 0.83*** and 0.96*** respectively. Strontium chloride extracted more Al but less Mn (P<0.01) than IN KC1, but because of the low levels of these cations in relation to the total cations present, there was still a good relationship (r= 0.99) between ECEC determined by 1.26M SrCl₂ and that determined as the sum of ammonium acetate extractable Mg, Ca, Na and K plus IN KCl‐extracted Al and Mn.     

Ammonium nitrate as extractant for soil exchangeable cations,exchangeable acidity and aluminum

Abstract

NH₄NO₃ (1 M) has been used as an extractant for soil exchangeable cations, exchangeable acidity and aluminum. The results obtained using NH₄NO₃ were identical to those using KC1 and NH₄Cl as extractants for the purpose of evaluating soil chemical status. The NH₄NO₃ extraction has practical analytical advantages.     

Comparison of five methods to determine the cation exchange capacity of soil

Background

Cation exchange capacity (CEC) is a routinely measured soil fertility indicator. The standard NH₄OAc (pH 7) extraction procedure is time-consuming and overestimates actual CEC values of variable charge soils. Unbuffered extractants have been developed to measure the effective CEC (eCEC), but they differ in the type of index cation and extraction procedures.

Aim

This study was set up to systematically compare CEC values and exchangeable cation concentrations among different procedures and evaluate their practical aspects.

Methods

Five procedures were compared for (e)CEC, that is, silver thiourea (AgTU), cobalt(III) hexamine (Cohex), compulsive exchange (CE, i.e., BaCl₂/MgSO₄), BaCl₂ (sum of cations in single-extract), and NH₄OAc (pH 7). We applied these methods to a set of 25 samples of clay minerals, peat, or samples from soils with contrasting properties.

Results

The CEC values correlated well among methods (R² = 0.92–0.98). Median ratios of eCEC (AgTU as well as CE) to the corresponding eCEC (Cohex) value were 1.0, showing good agreement between eCEC methods, but NH₄OAc exceeded Cohex values (ratios up to 2.5 in acid soil). For BaCl₂-extracteable cations, the ratio ranged from low (<1.0) in acid soils (acid cations not measured) to high (>1.0) in high-pH soil (dissolution of carbonates). Multiple-extraction methods (CE and NH₄OAc) yielded more variation and increased labor.

Conclusions

The chemical properties of the sample cause method-specific interactions with chemical components of extractants. We found the Cohex method with ICP-MS detection to be the most efficient and cost-effective technique for determination of eCEC and exchangeable cations.     

Extraction of mobile element fractions in forest soils using ammonium nitrate and ammonium chloride

The extraction of earth alkaline and alkali metals (Ca, Mg, K, Na), heavy metals (Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb) and Al by 1 M NH₄NO₃ and 0.5 M NH₄Cl was compared for soil samples (texture: silt loam, clay loam) with a wide range of pH(CaCl₂) and organic carbon (OC) from a forest area in W Germany. For each of these elements, close and highly significant correlations could be observed between the results from both methods in organic and mineral soil horizons. The contents of the base cations were almost convertible one‐to‐one. However, for all heavy metals NH₄Cl extracted clearly larger amounts, which was mainly due to their tendency to form soluble chloro complexes with chloride ions from the NH₄Cl solution. This tendency is very distinct in the case of Cd, Pb, and Fe, but also influences the results of Mn and Zn. In the case of Cd and Mn, and to a lower degree also in the case of Pb, Fe, and Zn, the effect of the chloro complexes shows a significant pH dependency. Especially for Cd, but also for Pb, Fe, Mn, Zn, the agreement between both methods increased, when pH(CaCl₂) values and/or contents of OC were taken into account. In comparison to NH₄Cl, NH₄NO₃ proved to be chemically less reactive and, thus, more suitable for the extraction of comparable fractions of mobile heavy metals. Since both methods lead to similar and closely correlated results with regard to base cations and Al, the use of NH₄NO₃ is also recommended for the extraction of mobile/exchangeable alkali, earth alkaline, and Al ions in soils and for the estimation of their contribution to the effective cation‐exchange capacity (CEC). Consequently, we suggest to determine the mobile/exchangeable fraction of all elements using the NH₄NO₃ method. However, the applicability of the NH₄NO₃ method to other soils still needs to be investigated.     

Fractionation of extractable aluminum in acid soils: A review and a proposed procedure

Abstract

Different forms of soil aluminum (Al) are involved in the retention of anions and cations, phytotoxicity of Al in acid soils, CEC reduction and soil physical properties such as aggregate stability and water infiltration. Therefore it is desirable to quantify the different forms of Al in soil especially acidic soils. A rationale was developed from a literature survey to identify the following fractions of Al: (a) exchangeable quantified by 1M KC1 extraction; (b) organic bound quantified by 0.1M CuCl₂ + 0.5M KCl extraction; (c) sorhed Al extractable with 1M NE₄OAc at pH 4.0; (d) amorphous Al oxide and hydroxide and amorphous aluminosilicates (if present) extractable with 0.2M ammonium oxalate at pH 3.0; and (e) interlayered Al extractable with 0. 33M sodium citrate at pH 7.3. Pools (a), (b), and (c) are extracted sequentially. Amorphous Al oxide and hydroxide (pool d) is calculated from ammonium oxalate extractable Al minus (a + b + c). Interlayered Al is calculated from sodium citrate extractable Al minus ammonium oxalate extractable Al. The latter two extractions are done on separate subsamples of soils. From preliminary studies and data for 13 soil samples it is suggested that this fractionation of soil Al is more meaningful than that obtained by the KCl ‐> K₄P₂O₇ ‐> ammonium oxalate > citrate‐bicarbonate‐dithionite extraction sequence.     

Effects of enhanced supplies of nitrogen and sulphur on rhizosphere and soil chemistry in a Norway spruce stand in SW Sweden

Rhizophere and bulk soil chemistry were investigated in a Norway spruce stand in SW Sweden. The rhizosphere and bulk soil chemistry in water extracts in control plots (C) and plots repeatedly treated with ammonium sulphate (NS) were compared. Treatment regime was started in 1988. Cylindrical core samples of the LFH-layer and mineral soil layers were collected in 1992 and used for water extract analyses. Samples of soil from LFH-layer and mineral soil layers were taken in 1991 and 1993 for determination of CEC and base saturation. Soil pH and NH₄-N, NO₃-N and SO₄-S, Al, Ca, K and Mg concentrations in water extracts were measured for rhizosphere and bulk soils. The pH-values of bulk and rhizosphere soils in NS plots decreased compared with those in control plots, whereas concentrations of NH₄-N, NO₃-N, SO₄-S, base cations and Al in water extract increased. In both bulk and rhizosphere soils the concentration of NH₄-N was much higher than that of NO₃-N. A significant difference in the pH and Mg concentration of bulk and rhizosphere soil between the treated and control plots was found only in the 0–10 cm layer. For all layers, there was a significant difference in NH₄-N concentrations in the bulk and rhizosphere soil between the NS treatment and control plots. Concentrations of exchangeable base cations and the base saturation level in the LFH-layer decreased in the NS plots. The concentration of extractable SO₄-S increased in the NS plots. The NS treatment enhanced the amount of litter in L-layer, owing to increases in needle biomass and litterfall but led to losses of base cations, mainly K and Mg, from LFH-layer. It was concluded that the NS treatment displaced cations from exchangeable sites in the LFH-layer leading to higher concentrations of these elements in both rhizosphere and bulk soil.     

Evaluation of Universal Extractants for Determination of Some Macronutrients from Soil

Evaluation of nutrient status in soil is important for nutritional, environmental, and economical aspects. The objective of this work was to find out the most suitable universal extractant for determination of available phosphorus (P) and nitrate (NO₃-) and exchangeable potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) from soils using 0.01 M calcium chloride (CaCl₂), 0.01 M barium chloride (BaCl₂), 0.1 M BaCl₂, 0.02 M strontium chloride (SrCl₂), Mehlich 3, and ammonium bicarbonate diethylene triamine penta acetic acid (AB-DTPA) extractants. Composite surface soil samples (0–20 cm) were collected from the Eastern Harage Zone (Babile and Haramaya Districts), Wolaita Zone (Damot Sore, Boloso Bombe, Damot Pulasa, and Humbo Districts), and Dire Dawa Administrative Council by purposive sampling. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. Results indicated that the greatest correlations were found between Mehlich 3 and Olsen method and also between 0.02 M SrCl₂ and Olsen method for available P. The amount of NO₃^– extracted by 0.02 M SrCl₂ was significantly correlated to the amount determined by 0.5 M potassium sulfate (K₂SO₄). The amounts of exchangeable K, Ca, and Mg determined by ammonium acetate (NH₄OAc) method were significantly correlated to the amount determined by universal extractants tested. In general, both 0.02 M SrCl₂ and Mehlich 3 can serve as universal extractants for the macronutrients considered in this study with the former being more economical when NO₃^– is included.     

Plant Availability of Cadmium in Soils: II. Factors Related to the Extractability and Plant Uptake of Cadmium in Cultivated Soils

Abstract

Eighty four soil samples collected from southeastern Norway were analyzed for Cd by extraction with NH₄OAc, DTPA, NH₄OAc-EDTA, NH₄NO₃, HCl and CaCl₂. The total Cd, pH, exchangeable K and Ca, dithionite-extractable Mn, available P and fine sand (0.2–0.02 mm) contents were the principal factors related to the extractable Cd, with some inter-extractant variations. Cadmium extracted by NH₄NO₃, NH₄OAc, HCl and CaCl₂ decreased with increasing soil pH, but the Cd extracted by all the extractants increased with increasing total Cd, exchangeable K and Ca, available P, and Mn-oxide contents in the soils. The Cd concentrations in plants were significantly related to the extractable Cd, exchangeable Ca and Mg, pH, Mn-oxides and organic matter content.     

Effect of soil pH on cation and anion solubility

Abstract

The effect of soil pH on the exchangeability and solubility of soil cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K, and NH₄‐N) and anions (NO₃‐N, Cl, and P) was investigated for 80 soils, spanning a wide range in physical and chemical properties and taxonomic groups. This information is needed from environmental and agronomic standpoints to estimate the effect of changes in soil pH on leachability and plant availability of soil nutrients. Soils were incubated with varying amounts of acid (H₂SO₄) and base (CaCO₃) for up to 30 days. Although acid and base amendments had no consistent effect on cation exchangeability (as determined by neutral NH₄OAc), amounts of water‐soluble Ca, Mg, Na, K, NH₄‐N, and P decreased, while NO₃‐N and Cl increased with an increase in soil pH. The increase in cation solubility was attributed to an increase in the negative charge of the soil surface associated with the base addition. The change in surface electrostatic potential had the opposite effect on amounts of NO₃‐N and Cl in solution, with increases in N mineralization with increasing soil pH also contributing to the greater amount of NO₃‐N in solution. The decrease in P solubility was attributed to changes in the solubility of Fe‐, A1‐, and Ca‐P complexes. The logarithm of the amount of water‐soluble cation or anion was a linear function of soil pH. The slope of this relationship was closely related (R² = = 0.90 ‐ 0.96) to clay content, initial soil pH, and size of the cation or anion pool maintaining solution concentration. Although the degree in soil pH buffering increased with length of incubation, no effect of time on the relationship between cation or anion solubility and pH was observed except for NO₃‐N, due to N mineralization. A change in soil pH brought about by acid rain, fertilizer, and lime inputs, thus, affects cation and anion solubility. The impact of these changes on cation and anion leachability and plant availability may be assessed using the regression equations developed.     

A comparison of methods for measuring extractable Ca,Mg, K,Na, Mn,Al, Fe,and P from New England forest soils

Abstract

An experiment was designed to evaluate several of the commonly used extractants and methods for determining “available”; elements in soils. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the suitability of these extraction procedures for use on forest soils typical for New England commercial forests. The extraction procedures selected included NH₄OAc pH 4.8, NH₄OAc pH 7.0, NH₄Cl, Double Acid, Bray, and Mehlich methods. The elements measured varied somewhat by procedure but included the base cations, Al, Fe, Mn, and P. As a bioassay of element availability, a greenhouse study was conducted using six forest soil materials from different horizon types (i.e. O, Ap, B) and three conifer seedling species (red spruce, balsam fir, and white pine). Relatively small differences among extraction procedures were found among the methods used for exchangeable Ca, Mg, K, and Na. Large differences, however, were found among the different horizon types in the amount of exchangeable base cations present. In contrast, significant differences were found among extraction procedures for Al, Fe, Mn, and P depending on the degree of buffering and acidity of the extracting solution. Of the elements measured in this study, only P appeared to be growth limiting with the NH₄OAc pH 4.8 being best correlated with P uptake by seedlings. Further work under field conditions over longer time periods is required to evaluate these methods for measuring P availability in forest soils     

Ammonium Chloride Solution as an Alternative Laboratory Procedure for Exchangeable Cations in Southern Brazilian Soils

Most Brazilian soil-testing laboratories use Mehlich 1 and 1.0 M potassium chloride (KCl) solutions as extractants for the determination of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sodium (Na) and for exchangeable calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), and aluminum (Al) in agricultural soil samples. Other laboratories use a combination of exchangeable ionic resin and KCl procedures. With recent adoption of the inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES) in routine soil-testing laboratories, soil extraction with 1.0 M ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl) became an alternative due to the possibility of determining all exchangeable elements in one run (Ca, Mg, K, Mn, Na, and Al), leaving determination of phosphorus (P) with Mehlich 1 or exchangeable ionic resin. To evaluate the performance of the NH₄Cl solution, an experiment was carried out with thirty-seven samples of soils representative of the southernmost state of Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul. Four extraction solutions [Mehlich 1 at soil/solution ratio of 1:10 and 1.0 M ammonium acetate (NH₄OAc), 1.0 M KCl, and 1.0 M NH₄Cl at soil/solution ratio 1:20] were used with three different shaking times (5, 30, and 60 min). Correlation coefficients among all methods were high. Mehlich 1 did not perform well against NH₄OAc and NH₄Cl, despite the high correlation coefficients, with values consistently lower for K, even when the time of extraction was increased from 5 to 30 or 60 min. However, for concentrations less than 0.30 cmol kg^?1 (i.e., in the range of K deficiency), both solutions performed similarly. Calcium and Mg increased with time of shaking. Comparable values of exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K, as well as of Al and Mn, were obtained with 1.0 M NH₄Cl with 60 min shaking and the standard procedures of 1.0 M NH₄OAc and 1.0 M KCl. The determination of Al by traditional titration/back-titration of the 1.0 M KCl solution gave slightly greater results compared to ICP-OES obtained using extraction with 1.0 M NH₄Cl. The results indicate that for Ca, Mg, Mn, and Al, it is possible to replace the traditional 1.0 M KCl extraction with 1.0 M NH₄Cl solution, with 60 min shaking time and a soil/solution ratio of 1:20.     

三峡库区2种土地利用方式下土壤盐基离子及碳氮含量对氮添加的响应

为探究三峡库区2种土地利用方式下土壤交换性盐基离子及土壤碳氮含量对氮添加的响应,以湖北省秭归县的林地和果园土壤为研究对象,进行室内土柱淋溶模拟试验,研究4种不同氮添加量(0,50,120,200 kg/(hm²·a))下,土壤中交换性Ca²⁺、Mg²⁺、Na⁺、K⁺以及NO₃^--N、DOC的变化。结果表明：随着氮添加量的增加,林地土壤中的交换性盐基离子淋失量显著增加(p<0.05),而果园土壤中的交换性盐基离子淋失量无显著变化,且林地土壤中交换性盐基离子淋失总量与各盐基离子淋失量均高于果园土壤;经N1、N2、N3处理后,与对照组(N0)相比,林地土壤中的交换性盐基离子淋失总量分别增加1.78%,4.45%,8.49%,且NO₃^--N淋失量分别增加89.21%,77.73%,157.25%,说明氮添加通过加剧土壤中NO₃^--N的淋失带走土壤中交...     

Lime requirement determination of tropical peat soil using buffer‐pH methods

Abstract

A study was conducted to calibrate and evaluate five buffers for the lime requirement (LR) determination of tropical peat soil. The buffers tested were the Shoemaker‐McLean‐Pratt (SMP); Mehlich; 0.1M ammonium acetate (NH₄OAc); 0.1M barium acetate [(Ba(OAc)₂]; and 0.1M calcium acetate [Ca(OAc)₂]. Calibration was done by comparing the precision of linear regression equations adjusted to the relationships between the LR rates required to achieve pH 5.0 measured in a 1: 4 (soiltwater) ratio as determined by incubation and soil‐buffer pH values. Incubation LR using calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) to achieve pH 5.0 by peat soil was utilized to calibrate each buffer. Evaluation was carried out by assessing the LR from the calibrated buffers which estimate the LR nearest to the target pH of 5.0. The calibration study showed that the SMP and Mehlich buffers were less precise than the Ba(OAc)₂, NH₄OAc, and Ca(OAc)₂ buffers. The evaluation study indicated that the Ba(OAc)₂ buffer is the most accurate, followed by NH₄OAc and Ca(OAc)₂ buffers. The Ba(OAc)₂ buffer method is recommended for LR determination of tropical peat soil and NEUOAc or Ca(OAc)₂ as an alternative method.     

A rapid method to determine cation exchange capacity and exchangeable bases in calcareous,gypsiferous, saline and sodic soils

Summary

A simple, single‐step extraction with LiEDTA for the estimation of CEC and exchangeable bases in soils has been developed. Multivalent cations are stripped from the soil adsorption sites by the strongly chelating agent EDTA, and are replaced by Li. In soils without CaCO₃ or water soluble salts, exchangeable divalent cations (Ca, Mg) are chelated by EDTA and exchangeable monovalent cations (Na, K) are replaced in a single extraction step using 0.25–2.5 g of soil and 10.0 ml of extractant.

In calcareous soils the CEC can be determined in the same way, but for the extraction of exchangeable Ca and Mg, another separate extraction is needed because dissolution of calcite by EDTA is unavoidable. This extraction is done with as much NaEDTA as needed to extract only exchangeable Ca and Mg in a 1:2 (m/V) soil/alkaline‐50% (V/V) aethanolic solution to minimize dissolution of calcite.

In gypsiferous soils gypsum is transformed into insoluble BaSO₄ and soluble CaEDTA by LiBaEDTA thus avoiding interference of Ca from dissolution of gypsum, which renders the traditional methods for determining CEC unsuitable for such soils. To determine exchangeable Ca and Mg, Na₄EDTA is used as for calcareous soils.

In saline/sodic soils replacement of Na by Li is incomplete but the Na/Li‐ratio at the complex after extraction is proportional to the molar Na/Li‐ratio in the extracts, so that the CEC and original exchangeable sodium (ESP) content can be calculated. Additional analysis of Cl and, if necessary, SO₄ in the extracts of saline soils can be used to correct for the effect of dissolution of the salts on the sum of exchangeable cations.

This new method is as convenient as the recently developed AgTU (silverthiourea), but is better suitable for calcareous and gypsiferous soils.     

Association of cadmium,zinc, copper,and nickel with components in naturally heavy metal‐rich soils studied by parallel and sequential extractions

Abstract

In this study, a new parallel and sequential extraction procedure was proposed to investigate the solubility of metals [cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and nickel (Ni)] and their association with soil components in naturally metal‐rich soils of Norway. Two different soils, alum shale (clay loam) and moraine (loam), developed on alum shale minerals were used. Each soil had two pH levels. For parallel and successive extractions, H₂O, 0.1M NH₄OAc (soil pH), 0.3M NH₄OAc (soil pH), 1M NH₄OAc (soil pH), and 1M NH₄OAc (pH 5.0) were used. A significant amount of Cd was extracted by NH₄O Ac related to concentration of NH₄OAc in the extracting solution. The amounts of Zn, Cu, and Ni extracted by these reagents were almost negligible except with 1M NH₄OAc (pH 5.0). Thus these metals were strongly bound to soil components. A seven step sequential extraction procedure was applied to evaluate the association of metals with soil constituents. The extractions were performed sequentially by extracting the soil with reagents having an increasing dissolution strength: 1M NH₄OAc (soil pH), 1M NH₄OAc (pH 5.0), 1M NH₂OH.HCl (in 25% HOAc), 1M NH₂OH.HCl (in 0.1M HNO₃), 30% H₂O₂ (in 0.1M HNO₃), 30% H₂O₂ (1M HNO₃), and aqua regia. In both soils at both pH levels investigated, appreciable percentages of total Cd (20–50%) were found associated with the NH₄OAc extractable fraction (mobile fraction). For Zn, Cu, and Ni, the percentage of total metal extracted with NH₄OAc was low (<4%), but it increased significantly by introducing a reducing agent (NH₂OH.HCl). The NH₂OH.HCl‐extractable fraction was the greatest fraction (>60%) for all four metals examined. These results suggest that among the metals studied, only Cd was easily desorbed from soil and should be considered mobile and potentially bioavailable. Other metals (Zn, Cu, and Ni) were strongly associated with the soil components and should be considered less available to plants. Using the sequential fractionation technique as a measure of availability, mobility and potential bioavailability of these four metals in the alum shale soils were: Cd>Zn>Ni>Cu.     

Vergleich zwischen Perkolation und Extraktion mit 1 M NH4Cl‐Lösung zur Bestimmung der effektiven Kationenaustauschkapazität (KAKeff) von Böden

Comparison between percolation and extraction with 1 M NH₄Cl solution to determine the effective cation exchange capacity (CEC_eff) of soils A simple method is proposed for the determination of the effective cation exchange capacity (CEC_eff). The soil is extracted with 1 M NH₄Cl‐solution, manually shaken for three times, and the exchangeable cations are determined by ICP‐OES and pH‐measurement. Comparison with corresponding results of the percolation method (n = 110 samples) shows good agreement in reproducibility, exchangeable cations (except Fe and Na), base saturation and CEC_eff.     

A new soil test method for the determination of plant‐available cadmium in soils

Abstract

A new soil test procedure using 1M NH₄Cl was developed for the extraction of plant‐available cadmium (Cd) from soils. Five grams of soil is weighed into a 50‐mL polyethylene vial to which 30 mL of 1M NH₄Cl solution is added. The soil suspension is then shaken on a horizontal shaker for 16 h at 25°C at 180 cycles per min. The suspension is then centrifuged at 2,500g for 5 min and the supernatant filtered through a 0.45 μm nitrocellulose filter under vacuum. Cadmium in the extract is then determined at 228.8 nm on a graphite furnace equipped atomic absorption spectrophotometer. A highly significant correlation was observed between the natural logarithm (In) of 1M NH₄Cl‐extractable Cd in soils and the Cd content in the grain of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durutn L.) grown on the same soils (r = 0.974, p = 3.8 x 10^‐7). In comparison with several commonly used extradants, such as ABDTPA, CaCl₂, NH₄OAc, and NH₄NO₃, the 1M NH₄Cl‐extracted Cd from soils was found to be a better index of Cd availability.     

A preliminary comparison of the ammonium acetate‐edta soil phosphorus extraction method to the bray‐1 and olsen soil phosphorus extraction methods

Abstract

The ammonium acetate (NH₄OAc)‐EDTA soil phosphorus (P) extraction method was compared to either the Bray‐1 soil P extraction method for non‐calcareous soils or the Olsen soil P extraction method for calcareous soils to predict com and wheat plant tissue P concentration and grain yield responses. The NH₄OAc‐EDTA method predicted yield and tissue P concentration responses to P fertilizer applications more accurately than the Olsen method at three of five sites. Both the Bray‐1 and NH₄OAc‐EDTA methods were successful in predicting corn and wheat yield responses to P fertilizer applications in non‐ calcareous soils in many locations. However, a direct comparison of extracted soil P levels showed that the NH₄OAc‐EDTA method extracted soil P at levels which were more closely related to the Bray‐1 method than the Olsen method.