Estrus Synchronization in Sheep and Goats Using Combinations of GnRH,Progestagen and Prostaglandin F2α

The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of GnRH, progestagen and prostaglandin F_2α on estrus synchronization in sheep and goats. Sixty Awassi ewes and 53 Damascus does were used in the study. The experiment started at the beginning of the breeding season (June/July). The same treatments were applied to sheep and goats as follows: no treatment (CON), 14‐day progestagen sponges and 600 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (S), gonadotropin releasing hormone followed 5 days later by prostaglandin F_2α (GP) and gonadotropin releasing hormone, progestagen sponges for 5 days and prostaglandin F_2α on the day of sponge removal (GSP). None of the ewes in the S group lambed from mating during the induced cycle. A greater lambing rate (p < 0.05) was observed in the GSP group compared with the CON and S groups while the GP group was intermediate. The number of lambs born per lambed ewe was similar among the CON, GP and GSP groups. However, the number of lambs per exposed ewe was greater (p < 0.05) in the GSP than the remaining groups. The induced cycle kidding rate was 77% for all treatments combined. Similar kidding rate were observed among treatments. The numbers of kids born per kidded and exposed doe from mating during the induced estrus were also similar among treatments. Greater numbers of multiple births were observed in the GP and GSP than in the S group. In conclusion, a combination of GnRH, progestagen sponges and PGF_2α can be effective in synchronizing estrus and improving fecundity in sheep and goats. Although the use of GnRH–PGF_2α was effective, the addition of progestagen sponges at the time of GnRH administration appeared to improve reproductive parameters.     

Effect of Progesterone Prior to GnRH-PGF2α Treatment on Induction of Oestrus and Pregnancy in Anoestrous Awassi Ewes

An experiment was conducted to examine the effect of progesterone prior to a GnRH‐PGF_2α treatment on oestrus and pregnancy in seasonally anoestrous Awassi ewes. Twenty‐four ewes were randomly assigned to three groups to be pre‐treated with 60 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate sponges (group A), 600 mg progesterone sponges (group B) or blank sponges (group C) for 4 days. All ewes were injected with 100 μg of GnRH 24 h after sponge removal followed, 5 days later, by 20 mg PGF_2α injection. Ewes were exposed to three fertile rams at the time of PGF_2α injection (day 0, 0 h) and were checked for breeding marks at 6‐h intervals for 5 days. Blood samples were collected from all ewes 1 day (day ?10) prior to sponge insertion, at the time of sponge removal (day ?6), 1 day following sponge removal (day ?5, at the time of GnRH injection) and at the time of PGF_2α injection (day 0) for analysis of progesterone. Progesterone concentrations on days ?10 and ?5 were basal and averaged 0.2 ± 0.04 and 0.2 ± 0.2 ng/ml, respectively. Progesterone concentrations on day ?6 were elevated only in group B ewes and were higher (p < 0.0001) than those of groups A and C. Progesterone concentrations on day 0 were higher (p = 0.002) in groups A and B than group C. Oestrous responses occurred only in ewes of groups A and B (p > 0.05). Induced oestrus conception rate was greater (p < 0.01) in group A than groups B and C. Ewes returned to oestrus 17–20 days following day 0 were two of eight, six of eight and three of eight of groups A, B and C, respectively, all of which eventually lambed. The overall lambing rate was 82% in progesterone‐primed ewes compared with only 38% non‐progesterone‐primed ewes (p < 0.05). Progesterone priming apparently sensitizes GnRH‐PGF_2α‐treated seasonally anoestrous ewes and increases their response in oestrus and pregnancy rates.     

Untersuchungen zur Brunstsynchronisation und Samenübertragung bei Schafen verschiedener Rassen

Inhalt Bei insgesamt 500 Schafen (260 Merino, 120 Dagliç, 120 Ramliç) in drei Schafzuchtbetrieben in der Türkei wurde durch Verabreichung von Gestagen-Vaginal-schwämmchen + PMSG oder PGF_2α (ein- bzw. zweimal) die Brunst induziert. 4 bis 6 Stunden nach der Brunstbeobachtung mittels Suchbock erfolgte die zervikale Besamung mit tiefgefrorenem (TG) oder frisch gewonnenem Sperma von Böcken der jeweils selben Rassen. Mit Hilfe von Gestagen+PMSG wurde bei allen Rassen die höchste Östrusinduktionsrate (96, 7 bis 98,3%) erzielt. Einmalige PGF_2α Verabreichung rief bei 60%, zweimalige PGF_2α Injektion im Abstand von 9 Tagen bei 88,3% der Schafe Brunst hervor. PGF_2α hatte den besten Synchronisationseffekt (80,6 bis 88,2%) 48 Stunden nach der Applikation. Die Non Return Raten 35 bis 40 Tage nach Besamung betrugen unabhängig vom Synchronisationsverfahren und von der Rasse 21,4 bis 41,9% bzw. 55,6 bis 84,2% nach Verwendung von TG- bzw. Frischsamen. Die besten Non Return Ergebnisse wurden bei den drei Rassen nach Brunstinduktion mit Gestagen+PMSG beobachtet. Rasseabhängige Unterschiede bezüglich der Brunstinduktion-und -synchronisation ließen sich statistisch nicht absichern. Contents: Investigations upon oestrus synchronization and artificial insemination in ewes of different breeds In a total of 500 ewes (260 Merino, 120 Dagliç, 120 Ramliç) of three sheep breeding farms in Turkey oestrus induction was performed by application of progestagen imprepated vaginal sponges+PMSG or of PGF_2α (given once or twice). 4 to 6 hours after oestrus detection by a teaser ram the ewes were inseminated cervically with frozen-thawed or fresh semen of rams of the same breeds. In all breeds the highest rate of oestrus induction (96.7 to 98.3%) was obtained by means of progestagen+PMSG. A single injection of PGF_2α provoced heat in 60%, while two injections with an interval of 9 days induced oestrus in 88.3% of the treated ewes. PGF_2α had the best synchronizing effect (80.6 to 88.2%) at 48 hours after application. Regardless of the breed and the synchronization method, the non return rates 35 to 40 days after insemination were 21.4 to 41.9% and 55.6 to 84.2% for frozen-thawed and fresh semen resp. In all breeds the best non return results were observed after oestrus induction with progestagen+PMSG. With regard to induction and synchronization of oestrus breed dependent differences could not be statistically confirmed.     

Pregnancy Rates in Angus Cross Beef Cows Bred at Observed Oestrus With or Without Second GnRH Administration in Fixed‐Time Progesterone‐Supplemented Ovsynch and CO‐Synch Protocols

Crossbred cows (n = 1073) from five locations had oestrous cycles synchronized with 100 μg of GnRH IM and insertion of controlled internal drug release device (CIDR) on Day 0 followed by 25 mg of PGF_2α IM and CIDR removal on Day 7. Kamar^® patches were placed on all cows at CIDR removal. Cows were observed three times daily for oestrus after PGF_2α administration. In the Ovsynch‐CIDR group, cows detected in oestrus (n = 193) within 48 h after PGF_2α were inseminated using the AM–PM rule. Among these cows, 80 received and 113 did not receive a second GnRH at 48 h after PGF_2α. Cows (n = 345) not detected in oestrus received a second GnRH at 48 h after PGF_2α on Day 9, and fixed‐time AI 16 h after the GnRH on Day 10. In the CO‐Synch‐CIDR group, cows detected in oestrus (n = 224) within 48 h after PGF_2α were inseminated using the AM–PM rule. Among these cows, 79 received and 145 did not receive a second GnRH at 64 h after PGF_2α. Cows (n = 311) not detected in oestrus received a second GnRH on Day 10 at the time of AI, 64 h after PGF_2α. The AI pregnancy rates were not different between the Ovsynch‐CIDR and CO‐Synch‐CIDR groups (p = 0.48). There were no differences in the AI pregnancy rates for cows inseminated at a fixed time (p = 0.26) or at detected oestrus (p = 0.79) between the treatment groups. Among cows inseminated in oestrus, there were no differences in the AI pregnancy rates between cows that received or did not receive the second GnRH (p = 0.47). In conclusion, acceptable AI pregnancy rates can be achieved with or without inclusion of oestrus detection in the Ovsynch‐CIDR and CO‐Synch‐CIDR protocols. Among cows detected in oestrus, cows that received a second GnRH yielded similar pregnancy rates when compared with cows that did not receive the second GnRH.     

Hormonal control of oestrous cycle in the ewe (a review)Contrôle hormonal de l'oestrus chez la brebis: revueHormonelle Kontrolle des Brunstzyklus beim Mutterschaf

During the cycle, the secretion of progesterone by the corpus luteum inhibits the positive feedback of oestrogens and thus prevents the LH discharge, and also primes the central nervous system for oestrous behaviour. Prostaglandin F_2α has been identified as the hormone produced by the uterus which causes luteal regression. The LH discharge leading to ovulation follows the demise of the CL. None of the characteristics of the LH surge (duration, maximum level, total release) can be related to ovulation rate. However, the interval from onset of oestrus to the beginning of the LH discharge is greater in highly prolific breeds than in less prolific ones.The knowledge of these physiological processes leading to oestrus and ovulation makes possible the control of ovarian activity in the ewe. In cyclic females, the control of the timing of the LH discharge and ovulation can be obtained either by inducing luteolysis with PGF_2α or its synthetic analogues after day 4–5 of the cycle, or by artificially lengthening the luteal phase with exogenous progesterone or progestagens.During the seasonal and post-partum anoestrus, PGF_2α is ineffective and progesterone or progestagens alone are generally unable to induce oestrus and ovulation. Addition at the end of progestagen treatment of inducers of follicular growth and LH release is necessary. Both PMSG and synthetic GnRH are used for this purpose.     

Timing of Ovulation and Fertility of Heifers After Synchronization of Oestrus with GnRH and Prostaglandin F2α

Synchronization of oestrus and/or ovulation can reduce workload in heifer reproductive management. The objective of this study was to compare two protocols to synchronize oestrus and/or ovulation using GnRH and prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) in dairy heifers concerning their effect on follicular dynamics and reproductive performance. Four trials were carried out. In trial 1, 282 heifers were treated with GnRH and PGF_2α 7 days apart (GP protocol). One group was inseminated on detection of oestrus (IDO 1), and the other group received two timed artificial inseminations (AI) 48 and 72 h after PGF_2α administration (TAI 1). In trial 2, 98 heifers were synchronized with the same GP protocol. Heifers in IDO 2 were treated as in IDO 1, heifers in TAI 2 received two TAI 48 and 78 h after PGF_2α administration. In trial 3, heifers in IDO 3 (n = 71) were again treated as in IDO 1. Heifers in TAI 3 (n = 166) received a second dose of GnRH 48 h after PGF_2α (GPG protocol) and TAI together with this treatment and 24 h later. Trial 4 compared the timing of ovulation after the GP and the GPG protocol, using a subgroup of the heifers from trials 1 to 3. The ovaries of the heifers were scanned via ultrasound at 48, 56, 72, 80, 96 and 104 h after PGF_2α administration. Timing of ovulation and size of the ovulatory follicles were compared between the two groups. In trials 1 to 3, conception rates to first service were between 49 and 66%. They did not differ significantly between IDO and TAI groups within or between trials. Pregnancy rates per synchronization were numerically higher in the TAI groups, but the difference was not significant. Conception rates to breeding on spontaneous oestrus in heifers returning to oestrus were higher than that after synchronized oestrus. In trial 4, more heifers ovulated before the end of the observation period in GPG than in GP (96.5% vs 74.7%; p < 0.001). Overall, ovulatory follicles were smaller in GPG (13.1 ± 1.9 mm vs 14.3 ± 1.9 mm; p < 0.001).     

Characterization of Oestrous Induction Response,Oestrous Duration,Fecundity and Fertility in Awassi Ewes During the Non‐breeding Season Utilizing both CIDR and Intravaginal Sponge Treatments

The aim of this study was to investigate characterization of oestrous response, onset of induced oestrus, oestrous duration, fecundity and fertility in Awassi ewes treatment with intravaginal sponges and Controlled Intravaginal Drug Release (CIDR) devices in combination with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) under local environmental conditions during the non‐breeding season. A total of 62 ewes were divided into three groups. Group CIDR (n = 20) was treated with CIDR devices for 12 days and 400 IU PMSG was injected upon removal of the CIDR. For ewes in Group Sponge (SP) (n = 24), 30 mg fluorogestone acetate was administered to the sheep for 12 days and 400 IU PMSG was injected upon withdrawal of the sponge. Group Control (CON) (n = 18) served as a control group and received no treatment. Adult, intact and sexually experienced Awassi rams were introduced to all groups at the time when the intravaginal devices were removed. There were no significant differences in terms of oestrous response (CIDR: 90%, SP: 87.5%), time to onset of oestrus and duration of induced oestrus between the CIDR and SP groups. The oestrous response of treatment groups was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than in the control ewes. There were no significant differences in pregnancy (CIDR: 70%, SP: 70.8%), lambing (CIDR: 85%, SP: 79.2%) and fecundity rates between ewes treated with CIDR and those treated with sponges. However, pregnancy and lambing rates were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in ewes treated with CIDR or sponges when compared with those in the control group. It was concluded that it is possible to induce fertile oestrus, successful pregnancy and lambing with the treatment of either CIDR or intravaginal sponge in combination with PMSG in Awassi ewes during the non‐breeding season.     

Ultrasonographic and Endocrine Evaluation of Three Regimes for Oestrus and Ovulation Synchronization for Sheep in the Subtropics

This study aimed to evaluate three regimes for oestrus and ovulation synchronization in Farafra ewes in the subtropics. During autumn, 43 ewes were assigned to (i) controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR)‐eCG group, treated with CIDR for 12 days and eCG at insert withdrawal, n = 13; (ii) PGF₂α‐PGF₂α group, treated with two PGF₂α injections at 11 days interval, n = 14; and (iii) GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH group, treated with GnRH, followed 5 days later with PGF₂α and 24 h later with a second GnRH, n = 16. Oestrus‐mating detection was carried out at 4 h intervals starting on day 0 [the day of CIDR withdrawal (CIDR‐eCG group), the day of second PGF₂α treatment (PGF₂α‐PGF₂α group) and the day of PGF₂α treatment (GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH group)]. Ovarian dynamics was monitored by ultrasound every 12 h beginning on day 0 and continued for 4 days. Blood samples were obtained daily for progesterone (P₄) and oestradiol 17β (E₂) estimation starting on day 0 and continued for 4 days. The obtained results showed that, oestrus expression, ovulation and conception were greater (p < 0.05) in CIDR‐eCG and PGF₂α‐PGF₂α groups than in GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH group. All ewes of PGF₂α‐PGF₂α group presented, on day of second PGF₂α injection with mature CL (P₄ > 2.0 ng/ml), compared to 42.9% in GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH group (p = 0.01). The peak of oestrus occurred 32–52, 48–60 and 28–96 h after the end of treatment in CIDR‐eCG, PGF₂α‐PGF₂α and GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH groups, respectively. Ovulation started 48 h after treatment in all groups and extended for 24, 36 and 48 h for CIDR‐eCG, PGF₂α‐PGF₂α and GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH groups, respectively. Results demonstrated that oestrus and ovulation synchronization could be efficiently achieved in Farafra ewes using either CIDR‐eCG or PGF₂α‐PGF₂α regimes; however, the GnRH‐PGF₂α‐GnRH treatment induced a more spread oestrus and ovulation that may make the protocol inadequate for timed artificial insemination.     

Timing of Ovulation and Conception Rate in Primiparous and Multiparous Cows after Synchronization of Ovulation with GnRH and PGF2α

Conception rates after Ovsynch have been higher in primiparous than in multiparous cows. The objective of this study was to investigate whether this difference might be due to differences in ovulation rate or follicular size. The experiment was conducted with 136 Holstein Frisian cows from a commercial herd in Brandenburg, Germany. All cows were synchronized using Buserelin (GnRH analogue) at day ?10, Tiaprost (PGF_2α analogue) at day ?3 and again GnRH at day ?1. Timed artificial insemination (TAI) was carried out 16–20 h after the second dose of GnRH on day 0. Milk samples for analysis of milk progesterone were obtained on days ?17, ?10, ?3 and at TAI. Progesterone concentrations were used to determine the stage of oestrus cycle at the start of the synchronization protocol and to investigate the presence of functional luteal tissue before treatment with PGF_2α and TAI. All animals were examined by ultrasound at the second treatment with GnRH, at AI, 8 and 24 h after AI. Overall synchronization rate (proportion of cows with an ovulation within 40 h after GnRH) was 86.8% in primiparous and 88.2% in multiparous cows, respectively. Ovulation occurred earlier in primparous than in multiparous cows (p < 0.05) and ovulatory follicles were smaller. Conception rates were numerically higher in primiparous cows but the difference was not significant. Cows that displayed signs of oestrus on day ?1 and received an additional AI on this day were more likely to conceive than cows that only received TAI 16 to 20 h after GnRH2. It is concluded that ovulation occurs earlier in primiparous than in multiparous cows after Ovsynch. However, a significant relationship between these differences and the probability of conception could not be established.     

Comparison in Effect of Heatsynch with Heat Detection Aids and CIDR‐Heatsynch in Dairy Heifers

The objective of the present study was to determine whether oestrous detection with the help of oestrous detection aids during the Heatsynch without timed AI protocol is equally effective with the progesterone‐combined protocol in dairy heifers. A total of 148 heifers were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. A group of heifers treated with Heatsynch with heat detection aids (n = 72) received GnRH on day 0, prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) on day 7 and oestradiol benzoate (EB) on day 8, while in controlled internal drug release (CIDR)‐Heatsynch group (n = 76), CIDR was included during a period from GnRH to PGF_2α. Heifers were checked for oestrus twice daily, i.e. from 09:00 to 10:00 hours and from 15:00 to 16:00 hours starting on day 2 for Heatsynch group and on day 8 in CIDR‐Heatsynch group, and continued up to day 12. KAMAR^®heat mount detector (KAMAR^® Inc., Steamboat Springs, CO, USA) and ALL‐WEATHER^® PAINTSTIK^® (LA‐CO Industries Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL, USA) were used as heat detection aids. AI was conducted within 1 h after confirming oestrus in 72 heifers, while 19 animals were transferred with embryo 7 days after oestrus according to the request of the owners. Premature oestrus before PGF_2α injection occurred in 18% of Heatsynch group. Of 13 heifers which showed premature oestrus, six were inseminated and two of them conceived. Oestrus detection rate within 12 days after initiation of the protocols did not differ between the two groups (94% vs 95%). There was no difference in the conception rate after first AI (including heifers that were inseminated before PGF_2α injection) and embryo transfer between Heatsynch with heat detection aids and CIDR‐Heatsynch groups (36% vs 44% and 70% vs 56%). It is concluded that the use of heat detection aids to monitor the occurrence of premature oestrus prior to PGF_2α injection in Heatsynch protocol in dairy heifers was equally effective to the inclusion of CIDR.     

Effects of Ram Introduction After the Second Prostaglandin F2α Injection on Day 11 on the LH Surge Characteristics in Fat-Tailed Ewes

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ram introduction after the second prostaglandin F_2α (PG F_2α) injection on day 11 on the secretion characteristics of pre‐ovulatory LH surge of fat‐tailed ewes. Multiparous Morkaraman ewes (n=12) were divided into three groups by balancing the groups for liveweight (BW) and body condition score (BCS). On the day of second PGF_2α injection (0 h), performance tested rams (n=2) were either introduced to the ewes at 0 h (ram 0 group, n=4) or at 18 h (ram 18 group, n=4) or were not introduced (control group, n=4). Blood samples were collected at 6, 18, 42, 48, 56, 62, 66, 70, 74, 78 and 90 h for the determination of pre‐ovulatory LH surge. BCS and BW during the experimental period were 2.2 ± 0.2 units and 50.9 ± 2.3 kg, 2.4 ± 0.4 units and 49.2 ± 6.2 kg, 2.1 ± 0.3 units and 45.9 ± 4.4 kg, respectively for the ram 0, ram 18 and control groups (p > 0.05). No significant difference was observed in LH surge characteristics for the experimental groups. Peak LH concentrations were also not different between groups (p > 0.05) and they were 12.2 ± 8.3, 29.1 ± 9.9 and 15.8 ± 9.5 μg/l for the ram 0, ram 18 and control groups, respectively. There was, however, a significant correlation between peak LH concentrations and BCS (p < 0.05, R²=0.373). In conclusion, it appears that, compared with ram introduction, variability in body condition of the ewe has much pronounced effect on the amount of LH secreted after the usage of two PGF_2α injections (11 days apart) as a tool for oestrus synchronization.     

Direct Effects of Luteal Regression on Anterior Pituitary Response To GnRH

The preovulatory period of the ewe is marked by a dramatic decrease in concentrations of progesterone in serum during the late luteal phase, followed by elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, final follicular maturation and ovulation. This experiment was designed to ascertain the extent to which removal of endogenous progesterone negative feedback at the anterior pituitary gland, independent of effects at the hypothalamus, promotes increased secretion of LH in the hours immediately after induction of luteolysis. Estrus was synchronized in ovary-intact ewes with two injections of prostaglandin F₂α (PGF₂α) analog given 10 d apart (Day 0 = second day after the second PGF₂α injection). Ewes were subjected to hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD; n = 6) on Day 3 and were pulsed with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Ewes were used during the estrous cycle or received approximately 400 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) on Day 2 to stimulate ovulation; there was no difference (P < 0.10) in ovulation rate or progesterone production between these two groups. Luteal regression was induced by injection of PGF₂α analog on approximately Day 10 of the estrous cycle. Blood samples were collected around exogenous GnRH pulses before and at 2- or 4-hr intervals after PGF₂α administration and concentrations of LH and progesterone determined. At 4, 12 and 24 hr after PGF₂α administration, mean serum progesterone levels in all ewes had decreased by 54.7%, 66.2% and 89.4%, respectively (P < 0.05) from pre-injection levels. The decrease in progesterone was associated with an increase (P < 0.01) in LH pulse amplitude with means at 4-hr post-PGF₂α ranging from 190% to 288% of pre-PGF₂α values. Mean serum LH levels were also increased (P < 0.01) within 4 hr of PGF₂α administration and remained elevated at all but the 24-hr time point. The timing of this increase (within 4 hr) indicates that it is independent of changes in serum estradiol concentrations, which do not increase for at least 16 hr after induction of luteolysis. Thus, removal of endogenous progesterone negative feedback at the anterior pituitary gland in the hours immediately after induction of luteolysis seems to play a role in facilitating LH release independently of hypothalamic action.     

A study on the effect of GnRH administration on the ovarian response and laparoscopic intrauterine insemination of Awassi ewes treated with eCG to induce superovulation

The effect of GnRH administration on superovulatory response of ewes treated with equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) in breeding and nonbreeding seasons and the contribution of laparoscopic insemination to the improvement of fertilization and embryo recovery were investigated. Twenty-four nonpregnant Awassi ewes of 3–4 years of age were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 12). Each ewe was treated with a progesterone impregnated intravaginal sponge for 12 days. The following superovulation treatment was used: ewes of group 1 received 1,200 IU of eCG once as an intramuscular injection 48 h prior to sponge withdrawal; ewes of group 2 also received 1,200 IU of eCG once as an intramuscular injection, 48 h prior to sponge withdrawal and after 24 h of sponge removal. Ewes were injected with 80 μg of GnRH. Ewes of groups 1 and 2 were further subdivided into four equal groups (n = 6). Subgroups A and C (superovulated with eCG and eCG plus GnRH, respectively) were mated naturally at least two times with Awassi rams of proven fertility at 8-h intervals. Subgroups B and D (same as A and C) had intrauterine insemination at 44–46 h after sponge removal, under laparoscopic visualization of uterine horns, depositing 1 ml of diluted semen containing 100 × 10⁶ motile sperm in the distal portion of each uterine horn. Ovarian response was assessed by determining the number of corpora lutea by laparoscopy at day 6 after mating. Embryo recovery was performed by using a semi-laparoscopic flushing procedure in both uterine horns. Results of the present study showed that ewes treated in breeding season with eCG plus GnRH has a higher number (P < 0.05) of corpora lutea than eCG alone as 7.33 ± 0.54 and 4.33 ± 0.39, respectively. There was no significant difference in the number of corpora lutea in nonbreeding season when ewes treated with eCG and eCG plus GnRH. The number of unovulated follicles was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in eCG treated ewes than in ewes treated with eCG plus GnRH, both in the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. The number of recovered embryos from ewes treated with eCG plus GnRH and eCG differ significantly (P < 0.05) as 4.32 ± 0.56 and 1.06 ± 0.26, respectively, in the breeding seasons. No significant difference was observed when these hormones used for superovulation in the nonbreeding season. A higher number of unfertilized ova (P < 0.05) was observed in ewes when naturally inseminated than in ewes inseminated using the intrauterine laparoscopic technique. Higher rate of embryo recovery (P < 0.05) was achieved when ewes were inseminated via intrauterine (4.66 ± 0.66) compared with ewes naturally mated (2.16 ± 0.74). The fertilization rate in ewes inseminated intrauterine using laparoscopic techniques and naturally mated were 91.5% and 44.8%, respectively. Fertilization failure in ewes inseminated intrauterine using laparoscopic techniques and naturally mated were 8.4% and 55.2%, respectively. It could be concluded that administration of GnRH 24 h after sponge removal increased ovulation rate of Awassi ewes treated with eCG for superovulation in the breeding season. The use of eCG to induce superovulation in Awassi ewes combined with laparoscopic intrauterine insemination increases the fertilization rate.     

Effects of active immunization against androstenedione on ovulation rate and fecundity in Galway and Finnish landrace sheep

Galway and Finnish Landrace ewes were immunized with an androstenedione protein conjugate (Fecundin, trademark of Glaxo Group Ltd.) on two occasions 30 days apart at the beginning of the breeding season. All sheep were treated with intravaginal progestagen sponges to synchronize cycles and exposed to rams for 6 weeks. The antibody titre to androstenedione, plasma androstenedione concentrations, display of oestrus, ovulation rate and litter size were determined. The results were compared with those for non-immunized animals and, in the case of the Galway breed, with ewes given 750 i.u. PMSG at the time of sponge removal.Over 98% of all ewes were mated within 30 days of sponge removal, but immunized ewes were delayed in their expression of oestrous cycles after withdrawal of progestagen treatment. The proportion of ewes mated that ultimately lambed was similar for all treatments, although during the first 5 days after sponge removal the conception rate was lower in immunized ewes. The mean ovulation rates for control, immunized and PMSG-treated Galway ewes were 1.75, 2.52 and 2.05, respectively; the corresponding values for litter size at birth were 1.48, 1.89 and 1.53, respectively.Comparison of the effects of immunization in the Galway and Finnish Landrace breeds indicated that ovulation rate increased in response to treatment in both breeds. Although litter size also increased in the Galway there was no evidence for a similar effect in the Finnish Landrace breed. Plasma concentrations of androstenedione were significantly higher following immunization in Galway than in Finnish Landrace ewes.There was an association between high antibody titres to androstenedione and the reduction in behavioural oestrus and conception rate immediately after sponge removal. The implication of this effect in sheep management is to initiate the immunization earlier in the season so that the introduction of the ram can take place 3–4 weeks after the booster injection when as these data have shown, the fertility of the ewes is similar to untreated ewes but the fecundity is higher.     

Evaluation of Synchronization of Oestrus Based on Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone and Its Potential Use for Fixed-Time Breeding in Tuli Beef Cows

The objective of the experiment was to compare the reproductive post-partum performance of beef cows synchronized for oestrus using prostaglandin F₂ (PGF₂) alone or with a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-based drug. Fifty-five post-partum lactating Tuli cows were randomly allocated to three groups. Two groups were synchronized using either two injections of PGF₂ (500 g Prosolvin per injection) given 11 days apart (group 1), or GnRH (12.5 g Receptal per injection) followed 6 days later by an injection of 500 g PGF₂ (group 2). The cows were bred by artificial insemination 12 h after they were observed in oestrus. Group 3 was synchronized as for group 2, but a second injection of GnRH was given 54 h after the PGF₂ injection, at which time the cows were bred by artificial insemination (AI) without detection of oestrus. Blood samples were taken from the cows in group 3 and analysed for progesterone concentration to establish which cows were cycling and in oestrus before and at the time of breeding. Detection of oestrus and breeding by AI was done over 60 days. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) among the three groups in the first service and total conception rates. The percentage of cows in oestrus within 10 days of the synchronization treatment was not significantly different (p>0.05) between groups 1 and 2. The progesterone concentrations in the cows in group 3 showed that only those that were cycling at the start of the experiment responded to the synchronization treatment and conceived after fixed-time breeding. These results suggest that combinations of PGF₂ and GnRH may be of value in synchronizing oestrus and controlling breeding in Tuli cows. However, the benefit might be greater if only cows that are known to be cycling are bred in this way.     

GnRH and prostaglandin‐based synchronization protocols as alternatives to progestogen‐based treatments in sheep

The study investigated, for cycling sheep, synchronizing protocols simultaneously to the standard “P” protocol using progestogens priming with intravaginal devices and gonadotropin. In November 2014, 90 adult Menz ewes were assigned to either the “P” protocol, “PGF” treatment where oestrus and ovulation were synchronized using two injections of prostaglandin 11 days apart or a “GnRH” treatment where the ewes had their oestrus and ovulation synchronized with GnRH (day 0)–prostaglandin (day 6)–GnRH (day 9) sequence. The ewes were naturally mated at the induced oestrus and the following 36 days. Plasma progesterone revealed that 92% of the ewes were ovulating before synchronization and all, except one, ovulated in response to the applied treatments. All “P” ewes exhibited oestrus during the 96‐hr period after the end of the treatments in comparison with only 79.3% and 73.3% for “PGF” and “GnRH” ewes, respectively (p < .05). Onset and duration of oestrus were affected by the hormonal treatment (p < .05); “GnRH” ewes showed oestrus earliest and had the shortest oestrous duration. Lambing rate from mating at the induced oestrus was lower for “P” than for “PGF” ewes (55.6% and 79.3%, respectively; p < .05). The same trait was also lower for “P” than for “PGF” and “GnRH” ewes (70.4%, 89.7% and 86.7%, respectively; p < .05) following the 36‐day mating period. Prostaglandin and GnRH analogue‐based protocols are promising alternatives for both controlled natural mating and fixed insemination of Menz sheep after the rainy season when most animals are spontaneously cycling.     

Use of Vaginal Electrical Resistance to Diagnose Oestrus,Dioestrus and Early Pregnancy in Synchronized Tropically Adapted Beef Heifers

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether a single measurement of intravaginal electrical resistance (VER), using the commercially available Ovatec^® probe, can discriminate between dioestrus and oestrus in Bos indicus females, which had been treated to synchronize oestrus. Santa Gertrudis heifers (n = 226) received one of three oestrous synchronization treatments: double PGF_2α 10 days apart, 8‐day controlled internal drug release (CIDR) treatment or CIDR pre‐synchronization + PGF_2α 10 days after CIDR removal. The heifers were inseminated within 12 h following observed oestrus, or, if not observed, at a fixed time approximately 80 h, following the last synchronization treatment. They were palpated per rectum for signs of pregnancy 9 weeks after artificial insemination (AI). Vaginal electrical resistance measurements were taken at the completion of synchronization treatments (presumed dioestrus), immediately prior to AI (oestrus), and then at 3 and 9 weeks post‐AI. Mean VER differed between presumed dioestrus and oestrus (113.7 vs 87.4, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.925, indicating that VER was highly discriminatory between dioestrus and oestrus. Vaginal electrical resistance at time of AI was negatively associated with odds of conception when all inseminations were included in the analyses [odds ratio (OR) = 0.97; 95% CI 0.95–1.00; p = 0.018], but not when fixed time AIs were excluded (OR = 1.00; 95% CI 0.97–1.03; p = 0.982). Mean VER readings differed between pregnant and non‐pregnant animals at both 3 weeks (120.5 vs 96.7, p < 0.001) and 9 weeks (124.0 vs 100.3, p < 0.001) post‐AI. However, 3‐ and 9‐week VER measurements were not highly discriminatory between pregnancy and non‐pregnancy (area under ROC curve = 0.791 and 0.736, respectively). Mean VER at time of AI for animals diagnosed in oestrus differed between each of the oestrous synchronization treatments (84.7, 73.6 and 78.9, groups 1–3 respectively, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that measurement of VER may improve accuracy of oestrus diagnoses when selecting cattle for AI following oestrous synchronization programmes involving tropically adapted cattle.     

Combined GnRH and PGF2α Application in Cows with Endometritis Puerperalis Treated with Antibiotics

The investigations were carried out on a total of 70 cows with puerperal endometritis. In addition to intrauterine antibiotic treatment, 30 experimental animals were administered 20 μg GnRH analogue, buserelin, between days 10 and 12 post‐partum followed by 500 μg PGF_2α analogue, cloprostenol, 10 days later. Forty control cows were treated only with intrauterine antibiotics. Blood samples for progesterone determination were collected from the tail vein twice weekly until day 70 post‐partum. The first rise in progesterone level above 3.18 nmol/l occurred significantly earlier in the experimental than in control cows (21.6 ± 9.2 versus 27.8 ± 12.3 days; p ≤ 0.05). The duration of the first cycle post‐partum was 15.0 ± 4.3 days in experimental and 19.7 ± 7.3 days in control animals (p ≤ 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the occurrence of first oestrus post‐partum. The involution of the uterus was improved after hormone treatment. At day 42 post‐partum, completion of uterine involution was found in 93.3% of hormone‐treated cows and in 82.5% of those treated with antibiotic only (p ≤ 0.05). Clinical recovery was 96.6% in the experimental and 82.5% in the control group (p ≤ 0.05). First service pregnancy rate was significantly better in hormone‐treated than control cows (51.7 versus 36.4%; p ≤ 0.05). Total pregnancy rate and insemination index values were not significantly improved following GnRH and PGF_2α treatment. The average service period was 89.8 ± 21.2 days in cows after hormone treatment, and 112.6 ± 24.5 days in control cows. The difference was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). These results indicate, that the sequential GnRH and PGF_2α application in cows with puerperal endometritis positively affected ovarian function and uterine involution, resulting in improved fertility performance.     

Response of fat-tailed Syrian Awassi ewes to accelerated lambing systems

Fifty cyclic fat-tailed Syrian Awassi ewes aged 2–4 years, with a mean weight of 51.4 kg, were used for 4 years to assess the accelerated lambing system (three lambings in 2 years). Ewes were divided into two groups: treated (T) and untreated (C). Ewes in the T group were treated with flugestone acetate for 14 days and injected intramuscularly at sponge withdrawal with 500 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG). Results indicated that ewes in the T group exhibited oestrus and were mated within 5 days post sponge removal compared to 11 days for ewes in the C group, and the difference in oestrus response between the two groups was significant (P < 0.001). Repeated hormonal treatments had no significant (P > 0.05) effect on the lamb birth weight. However, significant (P < 0.001) differences in the lamb birth weight were observed between singles and multiple births. In the treated ewes, the total number of lambs born was 211–157 parturitions, and the multiple birth rate reached 27.4%, whereas the rate in the untreated group was 6.3% with the difference being significant (P < 0.05). In the untreated ewes, the total number of lambs born was 14–13 parturitions (12 singles and 1 twin). Fecundity rates were 135.1% and 106.3% in the treated and untreated ewes, respectively, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Repeated administration of eCG had no negative effect on fertility of Syrian Awassi ewes. However, anti-eCG antibodies were produced following eCG injections with extremely high individual differences in the immune response among ewes.