FC-38 Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid and black currant seed oil in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a combination of immunostimulatory bacterial DNA sequences and allergen-specific immunotherapy for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. Seven dogs with nonseasonal atopic dermatitis diagnosed by history, clinical signs and exclusion of differential diagnoses were included. All dogs had been on allergen-specific immunotherapy for at least 12 months with incomplete responses, were on additional antipruritic therapy and showed residual pruritus. Pruritus was marked by the owner on a visual analogue scale, lesions were determined by a clinician using the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI), and concurrent medications were recorded before entering the study and after 14 weeks of treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and cultured; canine cytokine message for IFNγ, IL-4, TNF and IL-10 was quantitated using RT-PCR. A mixture of allergen extract and liposome-DNA complexes was injected intradermally at the beginning of the study and after 2, 4, 6, 10 and 14 weeks. CADESI, pruritus and medication scores, and cytokine messages at the beginning and end of the study were compared with a paired t -test. There were significant improvements in pruritus scores ( P  = 0.0277). Reductions in medication scores and CADESI were not statistically significant. IL-4 production decreased significantly ( P  = 0.0428); decreases in other cytokines were not significant. Although the number of dogs in this pilot study was small, the results warrant further investigation of a combination of immunostimulatory bacterial DNA sequences and allergen-specific immunotherapy for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis.
Funding: Self-funded.     

Masitinib for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study

There is an on-going need to identify medications suitable for the long-term treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD). Masitinib mesilate is a potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the c-KIT receptor. A strong relationship exists between the SCF/c-KIT pathway and pathogenesis of CAD, suggesting that masitinib may potentially fulfil the above role. This study reports on an uncontrolled pilot study of masitinib in CAD. Masitinib was administered orally to 11 dogs at a mean dose of 11.0 ± 1.83 mg/kg/day (free base) for 28 days. Treatment response was assessed by evolution of clinical appearance according to a modified version of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (mCADESI), pruritus scale and surface area of lesions. Masitinib improved CAD with a mean reduction in mCADESI of 50.7 ± 29.8% (95% C.I. = 29.4–72.0; p = 0.0004) at day 28 relative to baseline, with 8/10, 8/10 and 4/10 dogs showing improvement of ≥33%, ≥40% and ≥50%, respectively. Improvement was further evidenced by a decrease in pruritus score and the surface area of lesions. No serious or severe adverse events occurred during this trial, although 6/11 dogs presented with mild to moderate treatment related adverse events. There is sufficient compelling evidence to warrant further investigation.     

Recent developments in canine atopic dermatitis: a review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a genetically predisposed inflammatory and pruritic allergic skin disease with characteristic clinical features. New results on the pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects are discussed in this review. IgE-mediated hypersensitivity may be involved in the largest subset of atopic patients, yet there is another subset for which such involvement cannot be documented. Alterations in epidermal barrier function, priming of cutaneous antigen-presenting cells with IgE, intrinsic keratinocyte defects, and development of autoimmunity are also factors that contribute to the primary disease. Polymorphisms in regions of the genome that are of key importance to the inflammatory response contribute to the patient's clinical picture. Secondary infections, especially with Staphylococcus and yeast organisms, strongly modify or augment the inflammatory response, which changes over time. After the treatment of secondary infections and skin inflammation the avoidance of causal allergens would prevent relapse. Another causative therapy is the variously effective allergen-specific immunotherapy. The newest treatments for canine AD (cyclosporin A and tacrolimus) are highly effective at suppressing the allergic response and comparable to treatment with glucocorticoids. Canine AD presents a substantial diagnostic and therapeutic challenge over a patient's lifetime, and no single treatment is universally effective.     

Long-term use of cyclosporine in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis

This retrospective study of 51 dogs with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with cyclosporine (CsA) for a minimum of 6 months assessed the frequency of dosing and the need for continual treatment to control clinical signs. The study evaluated both medical records and information supplied by the owners in the form of written questionnaires and telephone follow-up. Laboratory parameters, possible adverse effects and owner satisfaction were assessed. The dose of CsA was 5 mg/kg orally per day and dogs received CsA for 6-30 months. At the conclusion of the study period, 28 dogs (55%) needed ongoing CsA to control clinical signs of AD: 8 (15%) received CsA 2-3 days per week, 10 (20%) 4-5 days per week, and 10 (20%) daily. CsA was discontinued in 23 dogs (45%) after 6-24 months due to either a limited response (22%) or after achieving a clinical response (24%). The results suggest that some dogs with AD treated with CsA may not require daily or even ongoing treatment to control clinical signs. Laboratory abnormalities were detected in 13 dogs (25%) during their CsA treatment. Two dogs developed oral growths and three developed hirsuitism. Forty owners (78%) reported no adverse events in their dogs during the treatment period. Thirty-six owners (71%) were satisfied with CsA as treatment for their atopic dog.     

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (III): the role of antibodies in canine atopic dermatitis.

Although an important pathogenic role for IgE is established in the case of allergic asthma and rhinitis in man, its role in atopic dermatitis is less clear. There are many studies where allergists and immunologists have provided evidence in favour of such a role, whereas dermatologists are less than convinced.In dogs, however, there is an abundance of clinical evidence implying that atopic dermatitis is antigen driven, and recent studies suggest that there may be a role for IgE, not only in the effector pathway, but also in antigen capture. Although an IgG response often accompanies an IgE response in dogs with atopic dermatitis, there is little evidence in support of a pathogenic role in respect of the former isotype.     

Calcineurin inhibitors: a novel approach to canine atopic dermatitis

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors represents a major addition to the armamentarium of drugs available to veterinary clinicians for the management of allergic skin diseases. Both cyclosporine and tacrolimus have been proven to be well tolerated and effective for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in dogs. Although broad spectrum in their mechanism of action, they lack the major adverse effects of glucocorticoids and provide an appealing alternative to traditional therapies. The purposes of this article are to review clinically relevant information regarding these agents and to provide tips for maximizing the benefit obtained from these therapies.     

The future of immunotherapy for canine atopic dermatitis: a review

Allergen specific immunotherapy (ASIT) is a foundation treatment for canine atopic dermatitis (CAD), though few critical studies have documented its effectiveness as a disease‐modifying treatment in dogs. The mechanisms by which ASIT works in dogs have not been elucidated, although they are likely to parallel those known for humans. Current ASIT approaches in CAD focus on either subcutaneous or sublingual administration. Greater knowledge of major allergens in dogs, ideal dosage regimes and details of allergen admixture are likely to lead to better efficacy in CAD. Evaluation of biomarkers for successful therapy may also be of benefit. Potentially important advances in human medicine, that have yet to be explored in dogs, include use of modified allergen preparations such as allergoids, recombinant major allergens or allergen peptides; modification with adjuvants; or packaging of the above in virus‐like particles. Co‐administration of immunomodulators such as CpG oligodeoxynucleotides or specific monoclonal antibodies might direct the immune response in the desired direction while calming the “cytokine storm” of active disease. Initial trials of alternative routes of administration such as intralymphatic immunotherapy have yielded exciting results in humans, and continuing study in dogs is underway. Progress in ASIT of human food allergy may provide clues that will assist with improved diagnosis and patient management of CAD. Importantly, further study must be undertaken to clarify the conditions under which ASIT is a valuable treatment modality for dogs.     

Prevalence and features of canine atopic dermatitis in Hungary

Medical records of 600 dogs diagnosed with atopic dermatitis were reviewed and evaluated with reference to history, geographical distribution, breed predilection, clinical signs and positive reactions to allergens as determined by intradermal skin testing (IDT) manufactured by Artuvetrin Laboratories. In 66.6% of dogs, the age of onset of atopic dermatitis was between 4 months and 3 years. Dogs living in the garden suburb of Budapest were more sensitive to house dust mites, fleas and moulds, and dogs from the western part of Hungary were more sensitive to weeds than to other allergens (p < 0.01). Positive reactions were most common to Dermatophagoides farinae followed by human dander. The breed distribution found in the present study was consistent with that reported in the literature, except for the breeds Hungarian Vizsla, Pumi, French bulldog, Doberman Pinscher and Bobtail which were over-represented among atopic dogs compared to the breed distribution of the general dog population of a large city in Hungary. Breeds with verified adverse reaction to food were Cocker spaniels, French bulldogs, Bullmastiffs, Bull terriers, St. Bernards, Tervurens, West Highland White terriers and American Staffordshire terriers (p < 0.05). The clinical signs of atopic dermatitis and their occurrence are in accordance with the data described in the literature.     

Advances in our understanding of canine atopic dermatitis

Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a genetically inherited clinical syndrome that encompasses a diversity of mechanisms and can have a variety of triggers. Development of clinical disease is the result of genetic factors and environmental conditions, which shape the resulting immunological response. Clinical disease becomes evident once a threshold of inflammatory response is achieved. Skin barrier impairment plays a role in promoting cutaneous dysbiosis and increased allergen penetration. Keratinocytes shape the response of dendritic cells and subsequent lymphocytic response. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is one of the links between the damaged skin barrier and the modulation of a T-helper (Th)2 response. It is still unclear whether mutations in skin barrier genes exist in atopic dogs, as they do in humans, or whether the observed alterations are purely secondary to inflammation. A dysregulated immune response with increased Th2, Th17 and CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells has been reported. A variety of cytokines [interleukin(IL)-31, IL-34, Macrophage migration inhibitory factor] are proposed as potential biomarkers and treatment targets because they are increased in the serum of atopic dogs when compared to controls, although a correlation between serum levels of these factors and severity of disease is not always present. The main issue with many published studies is that atopic dogs are always only compared to normal controls. Thus, it is unclear whether the changes that we find are truly a signature of cAD or merely a manifestation of nonspecific broad inflammatory responses. Studies considering comparison with other inflammatory diseases different from cAD are urgently needed to correctly identify what is specific to this complicated syndrome.     

The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (IX): the controversy surrounding the route of allergen challenge in canine atopic dermatitis.

For decades, the dogma that environmental allergens trigger cutaneous inflammation led to the denomination of canine atopic dermatitis as "allergic inhalant dermatitis". Definitive proof for a respiratory route of allergen challenge is lacking, however. Recent observations suggest, in fact, that skin inflammation could occur because of epidermal allergenic contact. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence published in favor and against the two suspected routes of allergen provocation.