用改良的RT-PCR技术快速检测传染性法氏囊病病毒

本研究将最新的病毒核酸纯化技术和单管ＲＴ－ＰＣＲ技术相结合,应用于ＩＢＤＶ的诊断研究,对４０余个病毒样品进行扩增反应,均取得令人满意的效果。该技术灵敏快速,从核酸纯化到电脉检测ＰＣＲ产物只需５～６ｈ,反应灵敏度比传统方法至少提高１００倍。所设计的引物对毒株的适用范围较广,对１２个ＩＢＤＶ毒株和１２个病变法氏囊样品均得到分子量一致并与设计相符的扩增产物     

Detection of infectious bursal disease virus in experimentally infected chickens by in situ hybridization

In situ hybridization was used in a pathogenesis study of three vaccine pathotypes (Delaware variant A, D78, and BursaVac) of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Tissues were excised (bursa, thymus, spleen, proventriculus, and cecal tonsils), fixed in formalin, and paraffin embedded at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hr postinoculation (HPI). With an antisense VP2 gene probe, viral nucleic acid was detected in bursas from both D78- and BursaVac-infected chickens at 24, 48, 72, and 120 HPI. However, viral RNA was detected only in the Delaware variant A-infected birds at 72 HPI. Thymus and spleen were positive in the D78-infected birds at 48 HPI and in the BursaVac-inoculated group at 72 HPI. Viral nucleic acid was not present in detectable levels among any of the tissues tested at 12 HPI. However, by 24 hr, scattered positive lymphoid cells were visualized in the bursal follicles of chickens infected with D78 and BursaVac. In addition, low levels of viral nucleic acids were detected in the thymus and spleen among the D78- and BursaVac-infected birds. The sites of viral replication were consistent between the two vaccine-infected groups (D78 and BursaVac), whereas the chickens infected with Delaware variant A had limited IBDV replication in the bursa.     

鸡传染性法氏囊病病毒的快速检测

随着 IBDV变异株的出现 ,发病鸡常不产生法氏囊的肉眼病变 ,由于传染性和非传染性因素亦可引起淋巴细胞减少和法氏囊坏死 ,所以 ,采取组织病理学方法诊断 IBDV感染并不完全可靠。由于主动性抗体应答需要一定的时间及大多数雏鸡都带有母源抗体 ,因此血清学早期诊断也不完全可靠。该试验采用本所研究的 IBD快速试纸与经典的琼扩试验 ,在对 IBDV的检测效果上进行了详细的比较 ,介绍如下。1　材料与方法1 .1　 IBD快速检测试纸　由河南省农业科学院生物技术研究所制备提供。1 .2　试验鸡　 1日龄试验鸡 30 0只由河南农业大学试验鸡场提…     

Tissue-print hybridization using a non-radioactive probe for the detection of infectious bursal disease virus.

Tissue-print hybridization was evaluated as a simplified means for detection of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) in the bursa of Fabricius from infected chickens. The assay employed a biotin-labeled synthetic oligonucleotide as a probe. The bound probe was detected using a color assay consisting of streptavidin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. Bursae were imprinted onto nitrocellulose and then hybridized with the biotinylated probe. Bursal prints from IBDV-infected chickens were readily distinguished from control prints by color development and differences in signal intensity.     

传染性法氏囊病病毒检测系统的建立

为了建立传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)检测系统,本试验在同一个试验技术平台上对9种IBDV检测方法进行了比较分析.IBDV野毒株盲传4～5代可适应于鸡胚和鸡胚成纤维细胞,死亡胚体水肿、出血,病变细胞圆缩、脱落.4个血清Ⅰ型1BDV毒株,用交叉中和试验可进一步分为3个血清亚型.用RT-PCR/SSCP技术分析4个毒株,扩增产物的电泳迁移率有差异.AGP、间接ELISA、夹心抑制ELISA以及中和试验等4种方法同时检测不同来源血清样品中的IBDV抗体,其他3种方法比AGP具有更高的敏感性,敏感度相差104倍.用AGP检测法氏囊组织样品,抗原效价可达到1:10,而细胞培养物和病鸡粪便则没有出现沉淀线;3种样品用夹心ELISA、RT-PCR、cDNA探针斑点杂交、RT-PCR/SSCP检测以及病毒分离等5种方法检测,均为阳性.     

Comparative susceptibility of chickens, turkeys and ducks to infectious bursal disease virus using immunohistochemistry

Twenty chicks, 12 turkey poults and 10 ducklings, all 5 weeks old were infected with 2 × 10^3.5 chick LD₅₀ IBD virus to determine the course of the virus in the 3 poultry species. Uninfected control birds were kept separately. Two infected and 2 control birds/species were euthanized at time intervals between 3 and 168 hours post infection (pi). Sections of thymus, bursa of Fabricius, spleen, liver, kidney, proventriculus and ceacal tonsil were stained for the detection of IBD virus antigen using immunoperoxidase technique. IBD virus antigen positive cells stained reddish-brown and the amount of such cells in tissue sections were noted and scored. Stained cells were present in all organs examined for up to 168 hours pi in the 3 poultry species except ceacal tonsils of ducks at 72 and 120 hours pi. Antigen score was highest in chickens and least in ducks as reflected by average of total scores/sampling time of 12, 10.8 and 8 in chickens, turkeys and ducks respectively. Total antigen score/sampling time in infected chickens peaked twice; 24/48 and 144 hours pi, whereas such bi-phasic peaks were absent in turkeys and ducks. Range of total antigen score at different sampling times was 7–17.5 in chickens, 10–13 in turkeys and 7–10 in ducks indicative of marked viral replication in chickens. Presence of IBD viral antigen in organs of all 3 poultry species is indicative of infections. The innate ability of turkeys and ducks to prevent appreciable replication of IBD virus after infection requires further investigation.