Evaluation of a romifidine constant rate infusion protocol with or without butorphanol for dentistry and ophthalmologic procedures in standing horses

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical usefulness of constant rate infusion (CRI) protocols of romifidine with or without butorphanol for sedation of horses.Study designProspective ‘blinded’ controlled trial using block randomization.AnimalsForty healthy Freiberger stallions.MethodsThe horses received either intravenous (IV) romifidine (loading dose: 80 μg kg^?1; infusion: 30 μg kg^?1 hour^?1) (treatment R, n = 20) or romifidine combined with butorphanol (romifidine loading: 80 μg kg^?1; infusion: 29 μg kg^?1 hour^?1, and butorphanol loading: 18 μg kg^?1; infusion: 25 μg kg^?1 hour^?1) (treatment RB, n = 20). Twenty-one horses underwent dentistry and ophthalmic procedures, while 19 horses underwent only ophthalmologic procedure and buccal examination. During the procedure, physiologic parameters and occurrence of head/muzzle shaking or twitching and forward movement were recorded. Whenever sedation was insufficient, additional romifidine (20 μg kg^?1) was administered IV. Recovery time was evaluated by assessing head height above ground. At the end of the procedure, overall quality of sedation for the procedure was scored by the dentist and anaesthetist using a visual analogue scale. Statistical analyses used two-way anova or linear mixed models as relevant.ResultsSedation quality scores as assessed by the anaesthetist were R: median 7.55, range: 4.9–9.0 cm, RB: 8.8, 4.7–10.0 cm, and by the dentist R: 6.6, 3.0–8.2 cm, RB: 7.9, 6.6–8.8 cm. Horses receiving RB showed clinically more effective sedation as demonstrated by fewer poor scores and a tendency to reduced additional drug requirements. More horses showed forward movement and head shaking in treatment RB than treatment R. Three horses (two RB, one R) had symptoms of colic following sedation.Conclusions and clinical relevanceThe described protocols provide effective sedation under clinical conditions but for dentistry procedures, the addition of butorphanol is advantageous.     

Curative-intent radiation therapy as a treatment modality for appendicular and axial osteosarcoma: a preliminary retrospective evaluation of 14 dogs with the disease

Canine osteosarcoma is a common bone malignancy associated with aggressive local disease and rapid metastasis. Current local therapeutic modalities do not provide curative‐intent options for dogs with significant orthopaedic or neurologic disease, dogs which are denied amputation or dogs with non‐resectable lesions. The goals of this retrospective study included the evaluation of local control, survival, and time to the development of metastases in 14 dogs treated with curative‐intent radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Median local disease control was 202 days (79–777). Median survival was 209 days (79–781). Median time to metastasis was 314 days (7–645). No significant correlation was found between the outcome and pre‐treatment alkaline phosphatase levels, radiographic appearance, tumour site, radiation dose or chemotherapeutics administered. In these dogs, full‐course radiation therapy in conjunction with chemotherapy was not found to yield equivalent results to the standard of care options.