共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
水稻浅湿灌溉的生育表现与节水效应 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1989年在江苏省不同生态稻区进行了水稻浅湿灌溉的多点试验。结果表明,水稻大 田生长期采取浅水──湿润(土壤含水量不低于田间持水量的80%)灌溉方式,不会造成显著减产,较常规水层灌溉每亩可节约灌溉水200m3左右,节水率达60%左右。汕优63采取全生育期湿润灌溉产量较高而稳,而献改63对水分较敏感。在本试验条件下,土壤水分状况对源限制型水稻的颖花总容量影响甚微,对结实率和千粒重则有不同影响。不同试点间,淮北由于水源不足,采取前温后水灌溉既节水又能高产,而里下河地区,水源充沛,宜采取全生育期湿润灌溉。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
不同灌溉方式对水稻产量及产量构成因子的影响 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
通过多年不同灌溉试验,研究了不同灌溉方式对水稻产量及产量构成因子的影响。结果表明,常规淹水灌溉栽培使水稻分蘖高峰期提前,分蘖增多,株高增高;节水灌溉栽培、极度节水灌溉栽培使水稻分蘖高峰期后移,分蘖减少,株高降低,生育期推迟。在常规淹水灌溉、节水灌溉、极度节水灌溉三种灌溉栽培下平均穗长递减。常规淹水灌溉栽培、节水灌溉栽培对水稻单位面积收获穗数和平均每穗实粒数影响不大;极度节水灌溉栽培对水稻单位收获穗数和平均每穗实粒数影响较大。节水灌溉栽培、极度节水灌溉栽培使水稻平均千粒重和平均结实率较高;常规淹水灌溉栽培反而使水稻千粒重和结实率降低。常规淹水灌溉栽培、节水灌溉栽培条件下水稻平均产量接近,说明水稻在栽培过程中适度的节水,对产量没有影响;极度节水灌溉栽培条件下水稻平均产量较低,说明节水过度对水稻的产量影响很大,降低了水分利用效率,反而成为低效用水。 相似文献
6.
7.
水稻节水控制灌溉技术试验总结 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
草甸白浆土保水能力强,通透性差,常规灌溉使水稻生长发育不良。通过节水控制灌溉试验结果表明,节水灌溉技术既降低了成本,又增加了产量,使农民增产增收。 相似文献
8.
9.
根据水稻生育进程中叶龄模式栽培体系,对水稻秧田、本田采用动态的水分管理,针对各生育阶段的不同生理生态条件,分别采用浅水灌溉、深水灌溉、湿润灌溉、晒田、间歇灌溉等方式,以实现寒地井灌节水种稻,并确保水稻稳产、高产。 相似文献
10.
水稻控制灌溉是一种节水栽培新技术。八五二农场生产大面积推广应用该项技术,平均节水70~100 m3/667 m2,节水率达22%~35%。控制灌溉技术在推广应用时,要与垦区应用的"浅、湿、干"灌溉技术有机结合,处理好生产性用水与控制灌溉的关系,同时要与水稻叶龄诊断技术相结合,以更加精准地进行节水灌溉,更好地发挥作用。 相似文献
11.
黑龙江垦区进行节水试验,试验结果表明:控灌处理用水量296.4 m3/667 m^2,较对照省水84 m3/667 m^2,但水分供应不充分,不能满足水稻生长的需要,具体表现为:株高较对照矮0.7 cm,单穴茎数较对照少0.5株,实粒数较对照少1.8粒,产量635.4 kg/667 m^2,较对照减产6.5%;节灌处理用水量345.5 m3/667 m^2,较对照省水20.9 m^3/667 m^2,水分能够满足水稻生长需要,并且因浅水灌溉增加水温、泥温,促进水稻分蘖,单穴茎数19.6株,较对照增加1.7株,促进水稻根系的发育,产量679.1 kg/667 m^2,较对照不减产,经济效益分析节灌处理增效2.6元/667 m^2,节约水资源的同时又增加了抽水的费用,具有实际的推广价值。 相似文献
12.
13.
根据 2 0 0 3年度啤酒大麦不同节水耕种技术试验结果 ,以产量和灌溉水生产效率为目标函数 ,分析比较了“垄畦沟灌”节水耕种方式的生产技术效果和其在不同耕作条件下的节水效果及灌溉水生产效率。初步确立了“垄畦沟灌”这一能够有效协调节水与增产矛盾 ,适宜啤酒大麦实现节水型生产的耕种新技术 ,平均增产 5 %以上 ,灌水生产效率 1 31~ 2 2 0kg/m3;免耕较施耕每公顷节水 330 0m3,节水率达 4 4 2 2 % ,灌水生产效率提高 0 87kg/m3。为啤酒大麦的生产应用和科学研究提供了新的技术和信息。 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
Recent water shortages in reservoirs have caused such problems as insufficient water and fallow rice fields in Southern Taiwan; therefore, comparing irrigation water requirements and crop production of paddy fields using a technique that differs from the conventional flood irrigation method is important. Field experiments for the second paddy field with four irrigation schedules and two repeated treatments were conducted at the HsuehChia Experiment Station, ChiaNan Irrigation Association, Taiwan. Experimental results demonstrate that irrigation water requirements for the comparison method, and 7-, 10- and 15-day irrigation schedules were 1248, 993, 848, and 718 mm, respectively. Compared to the conventional method of flooding fields at a 7-day interval, the 10- and 15-day irrigation schedules reduced water requirements by 14.6 and 27.3 %, respectively; however, crop yields decreased by 7 and 15 %, respectively. Based on the results, it was recommended that the ChaiNan Irrigation Association could adopt 10 days irrigation schedule and plant drought-enduring paddy to save irrigation water requirements for the water resource scarcity in southern Taiwan. The CROPWAT model was utilized to simulate the on-farm water balance with a 10-day irrigation schedule for the second paddy field. A comparison of net irrigation water requirements with the 10-day irrigation schedule from model and field experiment were 818 and 848 mm, respectively, and the error was 3.54 %. 相似文献
17.
Application of system dynamics approach for time varying water balance in aerobic paddy fields 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Increasing water scarcity has necessitated the development of irrigated rice systems that require less water than the traditional
flooded rice. The cultivation of aerobic rice is an effort to save water in response to growing worldwide water scarcity with
the pressure to reduce water use and increase water productivity. An accurate estimation of different water balance components
at the aerobic rice fields is essential to achieve effective use of limited water supplies. Some field water balance components,
such as percolation, capillary rise and evapotranspiration, can not be easily measured; therefore a soil water balance model
is required to develop and to test water management strategies. This paper presents results of a study to quantify time varying
water balance under a critical soil water tension based irrigation criteria for the cultivation of non-ponded “aerobic rice”
fields along the lower parts of the Yellow River. Based on the analysis and integration of existing field information on the
hydrologic processes in an aerobic rice field, this paper outlines the general components of the water balance using a conceptual
model approach. The time varying water balance is then analyzed using the feedback relations among the hydrologic processes
in a commercial dynamic modeling environment, Vensim. The model simulates various water balance components such as actual
evapotranspiration, deep percolation, surface runoff, and capillary rise in the aerobic rice field on a daily basis. The model
parameters are validated with the observed experimental field data from the Huibei Irrigation Experiment Station, Kaifeng,
China. The validated model is used to analyze irrigation application soil water tension trigger under wet, dry and average
climate conditions using daily time steps. The scenario analysis show that to conserve scarce water resources during the average
climate years the irrigation scheduling criteria can be set as −30 kPa average root zone soil water tension; whereas it can
be set at −70 kPa during the dry years, however, the associated yields may reduce. Compared with the flooded lowland rice
and other upland crops, with these two alternatives irrigation event triggers, aerobic rice cultivation can lead to significant
water savings. 相似文献
18.
深松和灌水次数对春玉米耗水特性及产量的影响 总被引:2,自引:2,他引:2
试验设置深松条件下灌水3次和4次(SI3和SI4)两个处理,以常规浅旋耕灌水3次和4次(RI3和RI4)为对照,研究深松及灌水次数对超高产春玉米生育期耗水规律、灌浆特性及产量的影响。结果表明,与常规浅旋耕相比较,深松处理可显著改善40~100 cm深层土壤水分条件,为深层根系的水分吸收提供保障,促进春玉米生长发育。深松处理较浅旋耕处理生产单位玉米平均节水量为0.149 m~3/kg,节水6.66%,单位耗水量增产量为0.322 kg/m~3,增产7.17%。相同灌水次数条件下,深松处理显著提高春玉米产量构成因素,增产达12.47%。 相似文献
19.
R. Loeve B. Dong L. Hong C. D. Chen S. Zhang R. Barker 《Paddy and Water Environment》2007,5(4):263-269
The Zhanghe irrigation system (ZIS) is located in the Yangtze River Basin approximately 200 km west of Wuhan in Hubei Province.
The reservoir was designed for multiple uses—irrigation, flood control, domestic water supply, industrial use, aquaculture,
and hydropower. Over a period of more than 30 years a steadily increasing amount of water has been transferred from irrigation
to other uses. Activities on the part of government, irrigation system managers, and farmers made this transfer possible with
only modest decline in rice production. Most important factor was the steady increase in rice yields. The water pricing system
provided an incentive for ZIS to reduce irrigation releases. With the steady decline in releases, farmers were forced to find
ways to save water. Farmers improved existing ponds and built new ones to store water (improved infrastructure). Access to
pond water on demand facilitated the adoption of alternate wetting and drying (technology) particularly in dry years. The establishment of volumetric pricing (price policy) and water user associations
(institutions) may also have provided incentives for adoption of AWD, but more research is needed to establish their impact.
These activities taken together can be seen as potentially complementary measures. Farmers received no direct compensation
for the transfer of water, but recently farm taxes have been reduced or altogether abolished. Further reduction in water releases
from the ZIS reservoir could adversely affect rice production in normal or dry years. 相似文献