| 蔗鸭共生对红壤蔗地土壤养分、酶活性及细菌多样性的影响 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马文清,郭强,闭德金,唐利球,韦持章,李宇翔,黄有总,王梓廷. 蔗鸭共生对红壤蔗地土壤养分、酶活性及细菌多样性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2022, 53(9): 2415-2424. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2022.09.004 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马文清 郭强 闭德金 唐利球 韦持章 李宇翔 黄有总 王梓廷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广西南亚热带农业科学研究所, 广西崇左 532415;2. 广西农业科学院, 广西南宁 530007;3. 广西大学农学院, 广西南宁 530004 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 广西自然科学基金项目(2020GXNSFAA2970230)广西科技基地和人才专项(桂科AD20297135) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 【目的】分析红壤地土壤养分和微生物群落对蔗鸭共生的响应,揭示蔗鸭共生促进甘蔗生长及改良土壤的微生态机制,为蔗鸭共生在红壤蔗区的应用提供理论依据。【方法】采用大田原位试验设3个处理:甘蔗单作、蔗鸭共生和肉鸭纯养,于甘蔗成熟期采集甘蔗单作和蔗鸭共生处理0~20 cm根际土壤及肉鸭纯养处理0~20 cm土层土壤,测定并对比分析不同处理的土壤养分、酶活性及细菌群落多样性。【结果】与甘蔗单作相比,蔗鸭共生极显著降低了土壤铵态氮含量(P<0.01,下同),极显著增加了土壤蔗糖酶活性。Alpha多样性分析结果显示,土壤细菌群落多样性Chao1指数和Shannon指数均表现为甘蔗单作>蔗鸭共生>肉鸭纯养。样本检测到的细菌类群隶属于44门1079属。物种群落组成分析表明,放线菌门(Actinobacteriota)、变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota)、粘球菌门(Myxococcota)是广西红壤地土壤细菌相对丰度较高的优势菌群。在属水平上,Gaiellales、JG30-KF-CM45、Gaiella、黄色杆菌属(Xanthobacteraceae)、67-14、Vicinamibacterales、JG30-KF-AS9、Roseiflexaceae、芽单胞菌属(Gemmatimonadaceae)、芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、TK10、Sandaracinus、Vicinamibacteraceae、Rokubacteriales、小单孢菌属(Micromonosporaceae)为优势菌群。与甘蔗单作相比,蔗鸭共生明显提高了JG30-KF-AS9相对丰度。【结论】蔗鸭共生改变了土壤有效氮养分,显著增加土壤蔗糖酶活性,但短期内其根际土壤细菌群落结构无明显改变。
|
| 关 键 词： | 蔗鸭共生 土壤 群落结构 红壤 高通量测序 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-04-20 |
Effects of sugarcane-duck symbiosis on soil nutrients,enzyme activity and bacteria diversity of sugarcane in red soil |
| |
| MA Wen-qing,GUO Qiang,BI De-jin,TANG Li-qiu,WEI Chi-zhang,LI Yu-xiang,HUANG You-zong,WANG Zi-ting. Effects of sugarcane-duck symbiosis on soil nutrients,enzyme activity and bacteria diversity of sugarcane in red soil[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2022, 53(9): 2415-2424. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2022.09.004 |
| |
| Authors: | MA Wen-qing GUO Qiang BI De-jin TANG Li-qiu WEI Chi-zhang LI Yu-xiang HUANG You-zong WANG Zi-ting |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Guangxi South Subtropical Agricultural Science Research Institute, Chongzuo, Guangxi 532415, China;2. Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi 530007, China;3. College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | 【Objective】To analyze response of soil nutrient of red soil and microbial community to sugarcane-duck symbiosis,and to reveal micro-ecological mechanism of sugarcane-duck symbiosis on sugarcane growth and soil improvement by analyzing soil nutrition and microbial diversity,so as to provide theoretical basis on application of sugarcane-duck symbiosis in red soil sugarcane planting areas.【Method】Three treatments were set up in a field in situ experiment:sugarcane monoculture,sugarcane-duck symbiosis and meat duck rearing. Soil was collected from 0-20 cm of rhizospheric soil of the sugarcane monoculture and sugarcane-duck symbiosis treatments and from 0-20 cm of the meat duck pure rearing at the sugarcane maturing stage. Then soil nutrients,enzyme activities and bacterial community diversity of different treatments were measured and compared. 【Result】Sugarcane-duck symbiosis reduced ammonium nitrogen content in soil and increased invertase activity in soil highly significantly(P<0.01,the same below)compared with sugarcane monoculture.Alpha diversity analysis showed that the Chao1 index and Shannon index of soil bacterial community diversity were sugarcane monoculture>sugarcane-duck symbiosis>meat duck rearing. Bacterial groups detected in each sample belonged to 44phyla and 1079 genus. Species community composition analysis showed that Actinobacteri,Proteobacteria,Chloroflexi,Acidobacteriota,Bacteroidota and Myxococcota were dominant bacterial communities in the red soil sugarcane planting areas of Guangxi,enjoying high relative abundance. Gaiellales,JG30-KF-CM45,Gaiella,Xanthobacteraceae,67-14,Vicinamibacterales,JG30-KF-AS9,Roseiflexaceae,Gemmatimonadaceae,Bacillus,TK10,Sandaracinus,Vicinamibacteraceae,Rokubacteriales,Micromonosporaceae were dominant bacterial groups at genus level. Sugarcane-duck symbiosis increased the relative abundance of JG30-KF-AS9 significantly compared with sugarcane monoculture.【Conclusion】Sugarcane-duck symbiosis not only changes available nitrogen nutrients,but also increases soil invertase activity significantly. However,it does not change inter-rhizosphere soil bacterial community significantly in the short term. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《南方农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《南方农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
