| 3种混播草坪外观质量比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马向丽,许文花,兰国湘,杨 蔚,毕玉芬,任 健,匡彦蓓,江元昌. 3种混播草坪外观质量比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(34): 129-132. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060070 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马向丽 许文花 兰国湘 杨 蔚 毕玉芬 任 健 匡彦蓓 江元昌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (;1.云南农业大学动物科学技术学院,昆明 650201；;2.红云红河集团昆明卷烟厂,昆明 650202；;3.华南师范大学生命科学学院,广州 510630） |
| |
| 基金项目： | 云南农业大学一类课程建设项目“运动场草坪建植与管理”；“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目子课题“南方优质饲草高效生产加工利用关键技术研究与集成示范”(2011BAD17B02)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为确定昆明地区混播绿地草坪的适宜组合，本研究采用“NTEP九分制”法对昆明地区3组（组合1：70%高羊茅+20%草地早熟禾+10%多年生黑麦草；组合2：50%高羊茅+40%草地早熟禾+10%多年生黑麦草；组合3：30%高羊茅+60%草地早熟禾+10%多年生黑麦草）混播绿地草坪进行外观质量评价。结果表明组合3草坪得分最高(6.97)，综合分析认为以草地早熟禾为建群种，高羊茅为伴生种，多年生黑麦草为先锋草种的混播搭配所建植的绿地草坪质量较好，适宜在昆明地区建坪使用。
|
| 关 键 词： | 黄瓜 黄瓜 突变体 赤霉素 生长素 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015-06-11 |
| 修稿时间： | 2015-08-17 |
Comparison of Appearance Quality of Three Kinds of Mixed Turf |
| |
| Affiliation: | Ren Jian;1., Kuang Yanbei;3., Jiang Yuanchang;1.(;1.College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201;2.Kunming Cigarette Factory of Hongyunhonghe Group, Kunming 650202;3.School of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510630) |
| |
| Abstract: | To determine the best combination of mixed turf under the climatic condition in Kunming, three combinations were set up to evaluate the appearance quality by NTEP. Combination 1 consisted of 70% tall fescue, 20% bluegrass and 10% perennial ryegrass; combination 2 consisted of 50% tall fescue, 40% bluegrass and 10% perennial ryegrass; and combination 3 consisted of 30% tall fescue, 60% bluegrass and 10% perennial. The results showed that score of combination 3 (6.97) was the highest. Integrated analysis indicated that using bluegrass as constructive species, tall fescue as accompanying species and perennial ryegrass as pioneer species was suitable to construct turf in Kunming. |
| |
| Keywords: | mixed turf appearance quality comprehensive evaluation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载全文 |
|
