|
|||||
|
|
| 三种禽流感灭活疫苗对农村散养鸭的免疫效果比较 | |
| 引用本文： | 邱伯根,郭永祥,刘道新,张强,邱立新,谈志祥,范仲鑫,何世成,唐小明,曾少才,彭晋勇,武维宝,黄艳平,刘广红,鲁杏华,张朝阳.三种禽流感灭活疫苗对农村散养鸭的免疫效果比较[J].中国家禽,2007,29(6):17-19. |
| 作者姓名： | 邱伯根 郭永祥 刘道新 张强 邱立新 谈志祥 范仲鑫 何世成 唐小明 曾少才 彭晋勇 武维宝 黄艳平 刘广红 鲁杏华 张朝阳 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 湖南农业大学动物医学院,湖南长沙,410128;湖南省兽医总站,湖南长沙,410007 2. 湖南省兽医总站,湖南长沙,410007 3. 湖南农业大学动物医学院,湖南长沙,410128 4. 沅江市动物防疫监督站,湖南沅江,413100 5. 汉寿县动物防疫监督站,湖南汉寿,415900 |
| 摘 要： | 采用重组禽流感灭活疫苗(H5N1亚型,Re-1株)、禽流感灭活疫苗(H5亚型,N28株)、禽流感H5-H9二价灭活疫苗三种疫苗免疫农村散养鸭,结果表明,在一次免疫和加强免疫中,重组禽流感灭活疫苗、禽流感灭活疫苗的抗体效价都分别明显高于H5-H9二价灭活疫苗同期的H5抗体效价,因此对水禽免疫宜使用重组禽流感灭活疫苗或禽流感灭活疫苗;加强免疫明显比一次免疫效果好,应用禽流感灭活苗对散养鸭免疫,必须加强方可达到理想的免疫效果。 |
| 关 键 词： | 禽流感灭活疫苗 农村散养鸭 免疫效果 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-23 |
Immunological Efficacy of Three Kinds of Avian Influenza Inactivated Vaccines in Rural Backyard Ducks |
|
| Qiu Bogen,Guo Yongxiang,Liu Daoxin,Zhang Qiang,Qiu Lixin,Tan Zhixiang,Fan Zhongxin,He Shicheng,Tang Xiaoming,Zeng Shaocai,Peng Jinyong,Wu Weibao,Huang Yanping,Liu Guanghong,Lu Xinghua,Zhang Chaoyang.Immunological Efficacy of Three Kinds of Avian Influenza Inactivated Vaccines in Rural Backyard Ducks[J].China Poultry,2007,29(6):17-19. | |
| Authors: | Qiu Bogen Guo Yongxiang Liu Daoxin Zhang Qiang Qiu Lixin Tan Zhixiang Fan Zhongxin He Shicheng Tang Xiaoming Zeng Shaocai Peng Jinyong Wu Weibao Huang Yanping Liu Guanghong Lu Xinghua Zhang Chaoyang |
| Institution: | 1.College of Veterinary Medicine,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha,Hunan 410128; 2.Veterinary Service of Hunan Province,Changsha,Hunan 410007; 3.Inspection Agency for Animal Epidemic Prevention of Yuanjiang City,Yuanjiang,Hunan 413100; 4.Inspection Agency for Animal Epidemic Prevention of Hanshou County,Hanshou,Hunan 415900 |
| Abstract: | The efficacies of three kinds of avian influenza vaccines,the recombined inactivated vaccine(subtype H5N1,Re-1 strain),the inactivated vaccine(subtype H5,N28 strain)and H5-H9 bivalent inactivated vaccine,immunized for rural backyard ducks was studied. The results showed that,for the one shot immunization and booster immunization,the antibody titers in ducks induced by the recombined inactivated vaccine and the inactivated vaccine were higher than that induced by bivalent inactivated vaccine respectively. Therefore the recombined inactivated vaccine or the inactivated vaccine should be given priority to apply in waterfowls against avian influenza. The efficacy of the program of booster immunization was better than that of one shot significantly,and booster immunization was needed in order to attain ideal efficacy. |
| Keywords: | avian influenza inactivated vaccines rural backyard ducks immunological efficacy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |