首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

西北灌区薯/豆连续套作对系统产量及土壤肥力的影响
引用本文:陈光荣,王立明,杨如萍,董博,张国宏,杨桂芳.西北灌区薯/豆连续套作对系统产量及土壤肥力的影响[J].草业学报,2017,26(10):46-55.
作者姓名:陈光荣  王立明  杨如萍  董博  张国宏  杨桂芳
作者单位:甘肃省农业科学院旱地农业研究所,农业部西北作物抗旱栽培与耕作重点实验室,甘肃兰州730070;甘肃环科雅农业科技有限公司,甘肃兰州,730070
基金项目:国家自然基金,现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金,甘肃省农业科学院青年基金,兰州市农业科技专项
摘    要:探求马铃薯/大豆连续套作下复合群体产量优势,为实现持续高产的生产目标提供理论和技术依据。2011-2014年,在西北沿黄灌区会宁县郭城镇,选用马铃薯品种克新4号和大豆品种冀豆17作为试验材料,设置马铃薯连作(PM)、大豆连作(SM)、薯-豆轮作(P-S)、薯/豆套作连作(IC)和薯/豆套作轮作(IR)5种种植方式开展大田定位试验,研究不同种植模式连续种植4年对系统产量及产量构成的影响,分析系统生产力及土壤肥力的变化特点,进而揭示薯/豆套作系统的生产价值。结果表明,1)薯/豆套作具有明显的产量优势,4年间,IC和IR系统产量与连作相比,分别提高了28.54%~254.07%和39.39%~283.98%,与轮作相比,分别提高了57.51%和70.81%。2011和2012年,IC与IR系统产量间差异不显著,但IC和IR与PM、SM、P-S处理间系统产量差异达到显著水平(P0.05),2013和2014年IR系统产量均最高,分别达到9912.79和9589.90kg/hm2,较IC处理分别提高了15.38%和8.45%,且与其他处理间均差异达到显著水平(P0.05)。2)不同种植模式在年际间变化显著,对于PM,2012年(连作1年)与2011年(正茬)产量差异不显著,而2013年(连作2年)和2014年(连作3年)产量较2011年分别下降了22.07%和42.11%;SM和IC变化趋势与PM表现一致,连作2年后,降幅分别为31.15%~53.60%和13.91%~24.17%;对于P-S和IR而言,年际间系统产量无显著变化。3)不同种植模式对耕层土壤肥力性质指标的影响程度是:有效磷碱解氮全氮全磷速效钾有机质全钾pH。较PM、SM和P-M,IC和IR连续套作4年,耕层土壤全氮、全磷、全钾、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾呈下降趋势,尤其是有效磷和速效钾,下降幅度分别达到26.24%~42.87%和18.48%~30.22%。马铃薯和大豆连作2年后产量显著下降,薯/豆连续套作4年(IC或IR),相对于连作或轮作具有明显的生产力优势,尤其是薯/豆套作轮作模式,基于养分吸收量的增加和养分利用效率的提高,连续4年系统产量相对稳定。

关 键 词:马铃薯  大豆  连续套作  系统产量  耕层土壤肥力
收稿时间:2017-03-31

Crop yield and soil fertility affected by continuous potato/soybean intercropping systems along the Yellow River
CHEN Guang-Rong,WANG Li-Ming,YANG Ru-Ping,DONG Bo,ZHANG Guo-Hong,YANG Gui-Fang.Crop yield and soil fertility affected by continuous potato/soybean intercropping systems along the Yellow River[J].Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2017,26(10):46-55.
Authors:CHEN Guang-Rong  WANG Li-Ming  YANG Ru-Ping  DONG Bo  ZHANG Guo-Hong  YANG Gui-Fang
Abstract:The objective of this work was to explore the mechanisms for the yield advantage of a potato/soybean continuous intercropping system.Potato,variety Kexin 4 and soybean,variety Jidou 12 were used in a longterm field experiment undertaken from 2011 to 2014 in Guochen,Huining County,Gansu Province in the Northwest irrigation district.The treatments included potato monocropping (PM),soybean monocropping (SM),potato-soybean rotational system (P-S),potato/soybean continues intercropping (IC) and potato/soybean rotational intercropping (IR).The influences of different cultivation systems on crop yields and soil fertility were analyzed.Continuous intercropping systems produced higher yields;IC and IR treatments enhanced yield by 28.5%-254.1% and 39.4%-284.0% compared with PM and SM,respectively and by 57.5% to 70.8% compared with P-S.There was no difference in yield between IC and IR in 2011 and 2012 but in 2013 and 2014 IR yield was significantly higher than those of PM,SM,IC and P-S,achieving 9913 kg/ha and 9590 kg/ha,respectively.Cultivation system influenced yield over time.For PM,yield was stable after 1 year but declined significantly by 22.1 % and 42.1% after two and three years of continuous cropping,respectively.The SM and IC treatments significantly reduced yields by 31.2%-53.6% and 13.9%-24.2% after two years,respectively.The P-M and IR treatments did not influence yield over the four years of the study.Topsoil fertility was improved to some extent by different cultivation systems;Olsen P>available N>total N>total P>available K>organic carbon>total K>pH.Topsoil fertility in the IC and IR treatments decline after four years of continuous cropping compared with PM,SM and P-S;Olsen P and available K decreased by 26.2%-42.9% and 18.5%-30.2%,respectively.The results of this study showed that potato/soybean intercropping systems (IC or IR) produced better yields after four years of continuous cropping compared with monocropping and rotational cropping with the potato/soybean rotational intercropping system clearly superior.
Keywords:potato  soybean  continuous intercropping  system yields  topsoil fertility
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《草业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《草业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号