首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

青岛斋堂岛海域春季双桩竖杆张网网囊网目的选择性
引用本文:李超,张秀梅,陈平,张沛东.青岛斋堂岛海域春季双桩竖杆张网网囊网目的选择性[J].中国水产科学,2015,22(4):799-811.
作者姓名:李超  张秀梅  陈平  张沛东
作者单位:中国海洋大学 水产学院, 山东 青岛 266003
基金项目:公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201003068); 海洋公益性行业科研专项(201305043).
摘    要:2014年春季,采用平行作业法,以2a=16 mm(a为目脚长度)的菱形目网囊为对照网(CN),选取30 mm菱形目网囊和20 mm、30 mm、40 mm的方形目网囊(分别以30D、20S、30S和40S表示)作为实验网囊,对青岛斋堂岛附近海域的双桩竖杆张网进行了不同网目形状的网囊和不同网目尺寸方形目网囊的选择性比较试验。以多元统计分析方法进行种间选择性分析,以Logistic曲线作为选择性模型、采用极大似然估算法进行种内选择性分析。结果显示,与对照网相比,所有实验网囊均能有效释放玉筋鱼(Ammodytes personatus)、舒氏海龙(Syngnathus schlegeli)等低值渔获以及经济鱼类的幼体。比较不同网目形状网囊的渔获数据发现,方形目网囊较菱形目网囊具有更好的选择性,其中30S网囊对玉筋鱼和舒氏海龙的释放率(以尾数计)分别比30D网囊高4.61%和16.80%,对六丝钝尾虾虎鱼(Amblychaeturichthys hexanema)和日本枪乌贼(Loigo japonica)的50%选择体长(胴长)L50分别比30D网囊大38.47%和61.29%。比较不同网目尺寸方形目网囊的渔获数据发现,当实验网为20S和30S时,六丝钝尾虾虎鱼的L50分别为6.58 cm和7.20 cm,选择范围(SR)分别为3.02 cm和0.87 cm;当实验网为20S、30S和40S时,日本枪乌贼的L50分别为2.88 cm、4.03 cm和10.49 cm,SR分别为0.74 cm、0.52 cm和2.67 cm;不同尺寸的方形目网囊对这2种渔获物的L50随着网目尺寸的增大而增大。根据实验海区各种渔获物的经济价值、低值鱼类和幼鱼的释放比例以及分拣渔获物的劳动力投入等综合分析认为,30 mm方形目网囊在保护渔业资源的同时对渔业生产不会造成显著影响,建议予以推广。

关 键 词:双桩竖杆张网    方形目网囊    菱形目网囊    黄海    斋堂岛
修稿时间:2015/7/29 0:00:00

Selectivity of codend mesh sizes in stow nets during spring on the coast of Zhaitang Island, Qingdao
LI Chao,ZHANG Xiumei,CHEN Ping,ZHANG Peidong.Selectivity of codend mesh sizes in stow nets during spring on the coast of Zhaitang Island, Qingdao[J].Journal of Fishery Sciences of China,2015,22(4):799-811.
Authors:LI Chao  ZHANG Xiumei  CHEN Ping  ZHANG Peidong
Institution:Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Abstract:The selectivities of 30 mm diamond mesh codend (30D) and square mesh codends with mesh sizes of 20 mm (20S), 30 mm (30S), and 40 mm (40S) were studied using the parallel haul method and a logistic curve on the coast of Zhaitang Island, Qingdao, in spring 2014. Diamond codend of 16 mm (2Multivariate statistics and the maximum likelihood method indicated that all experimental codends were effective in releasing of some economic fish species relative to the control net. Square mesh codends showed better selectivity than diamond mesh codends. The for 30S were 4.61% and 16.80% higher than those for 30D, and the 50% retention body length ( 38.47% and 61.29%Comparison with catch data using square mesh codends showed that the was 6.58 cm and 7.20 cm, and the selection rage (SR) was 3.02 cm and 0.87 cmof was 2.88 cm, 4.03 cm and 10.49 cm, and the SR was 0.74 cm, 0.52 cm and 2.67 cm for the 20S, 30S and 40S, respectively. Thus, t increased with larger square codend mesh size. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of different mesh types on the economic value of the catch, the release ratio of low economic value captures, and labor input of sorting catches all suggest that the use of 30 mm square mesh codend the fishery by reducing unwanted bycatch and therefore should be implemented in the region.
Keywords:stow net  square mesh codend  diamond mesh codend  Yellow Sea  Zhaitang Island
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国水产科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国水产科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号