首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

检出虾肝肠胞虫(Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei)的凡纳滨对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)群体的体长和体重关系
引用本文:刘雅梅,邱 亮,程东远,张庆利,万晓媛,黄 倢.检出虾肝肠胞虫(Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei)的凡纳滨对虾(Litopenaeus vannamei)群体的体长和体重关系[J].海洋水产研究,2017,38(4):96-103.
作者姓名:刘雅梅  邱 亮  程东远  张庆利  万晓媛  黄 倢
作者单位:1. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋渔业科学与食物产出过程功能实验室 农业部海水养殖病害防治重点实验室 青岛市海水养殖流行病学与生物安保重点实验室中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 青岛 266071;上海海洋大学水产与生命学院 上海 201306;2. 青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室海洋渔业科学与食物产出过程功能实验室 农业部海水养殖病害防治重点实验室 青岛市海水养殖流行病学与生物安保重点实验室中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 青岛 266071
基金项目:公益性行业科研专项经费项目,现代农业产业技术体系,山东省泰山学者建设工程专项经费和青岛海洋科学与技术国家实验室鳌山科技创新项目(2015ASKJ02)共同资助[This work was supported by the Projects under the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest,China Agriculture Research System,the Construction Projramme for Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province of China
摘    要:对采自天津、浙江和山东等养殖场5个凡纳滨对虾Litopenaeus vannamei)群体的442尾个体进行虾肝肠胞虫(Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei,EHP)的TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR检测,并测量各群体每尾对虾的生物学体长和体重.引入医学上的劳累尔(Rohrer)体重指数(Ponderal index,PI,W/L3)关系建立对虾体重(W)和体长(L)关系函数.结果显示,4个凡纳滨对虾的EHP阳性群体平均体长为(5.37±1.19) cm]的体重指数PI平均值为(5.19±0.26)×10-3 g/cm3,EHP阴性群体的凡纳滨对虾群体平均体长为(2.49±0.21)cm]为(7.96±0.51)×10-3 g/cm3,根据PI=a·L(b-3)的函数矫正EHP阴性和阳性群体的体长差异引起的PI差值后,同等体长EHP阳性群体的PI值为阴性群体的(70.5±8.7)%,表明同样大小的个体,EHP阳性群体的平均体重比阴性群体平均体重低30%;EHP阳性群体中凡纳滨对虾体长和体重的变异系数是EHP阴性群体的(2.39±0.93)和(2.05±0.86)倍,表现为对虾EHP阳性群体个体大小不均匀;EHP阳性群体体重偏差率是EHP阴性群体的2.34-3.45倍,体长相同时,EHP阳性的体重波动变大.

关 键 词:凡纳滨对虾  体长  体重  劳雷尔体重指数  虾肝肠胞虫
收稿时间:2016/4/18 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/5/27 0:00:00

The Relationship of Body Length and Weight in the Litopenaeus vannamei Populations Detected Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei
LIU Yamei,QIU Liang,CHENG Dongyuan,ZHANG Qingli,WAN Xiaoyuan and HUANG Jie.The Relationship of Body Length and Weight in the Litopenaeus vannamei Populations Detected Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei[J].Marine Fisheries Research,2017,38(4):96-103.
Authors:LIU Yamei  QIU Liang  CHENG Dongyuan  ZHANG Qingli  WAN Xiaoyuan and HUANG Jie
Institution:Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306,Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306,Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306,Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306,Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; and Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Maricultural Organism Disease Control, Ministry of Agriculture, Qingdao Key Laboratory for Maricultural Organism Epidemiology and Biosecurity, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071; College of Fisheries and Life Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306
Abstract:Microsporidia Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) was detected using probe based real-time PCR from 442 shrimp coming from 5 farmed Litopenaeus vannamei populations in Tianjin,Zhejiang,and Shandong Province.The biological length and body weight of shrimp were measured individually.The Rohrer's ponderal index (PI,W/L3) originally used in medical science was introduced in this study to establish the fuction of body weight (W) and biological length (L) of shrimp.The results showed that the PI of 4 EHP positive populations with an average biological length at (5.37±1.19) cm was calculated as (5.19±0.26)× 10-3 g/cm3,while that of the EHP negative population with an average biological length was (7.96±0.51)×10-3 g/cm3.After adjusting of the difference of PI caused by biological length according to the function PI=a.L(b-3),the PI of EHP positive populations was about (70.5±8.7)% of that of the EHP negative populations at the same biological length.It indicated that the average body weight of shrimp in an EHP positive population was about 30% smaller than that of shrimp with same size in biological length in an EHP negative population.The coefficient of variation (CV) of biological length and body weight in EHP positive populations was (2.39±0.93) times and (2.05±0.86) times of those in the EHP population,respectively,suggesting significant size variation in the EHP positive populations.The deviation ratio of actual body weight to body weight estimated on biological length in the EHP positive populations was 2.34 to 3.45 times of that in the EHP negative population,indicating the shrimp with same size in the EHP positive populations had greater fluctuation in body weight.
Keywords:Litopenaeus vannamei  Biological length  Body weight  Rohrer's ponderal index  Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《海洋水产研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《海洋水产研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号