首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

象山港三种不同养殖方式对浮游动物群落的影响
引用本文:杜萍,徐晓群,徐旭丹,周孔霖,骆鑫,陈全震,曾江宁,寿鹿,张德民.象山港三种不同养殖方式对浮游动物群落的影响[J].水产学报,2017,41(11):1719-1733.
作者姓名:杜萍  徐晓群  徐旭丹  周孔霖  骆鑫  陈全震  曾江宁  寿鹿  张德民
作者单位:1. 宁波大学海洋学院,浙江宁波 315211;国家海洋局第二海洋研究所,国家海洋局海洋生态系统与生物地球化学重点实验室,浙江杭州 310012;2. 国家海洋局第二海洋研究所,国家海洋局海洋生态系统与生物地球化学重点实验室,浙江杭州 310012;3. 广西壮族自治区海洋环境监测中心站,广西北海,536000;4. 宁波大学海洋学院,浙江宁波,315211
基金项目:海洋公益性行业科研专项(201305043-3,201505027-4,201405007);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(LORCE计划,JG1714);浙江省自然科学基金(LY14D060007);浙江省重中之重学科开放基金项目(XKZSC1411);宁波大学王宽诚基金
摘    要:为探究不同营养类型养殖方式对半封闭海湾浮游生态系统的影响,于2015年在象山港的鱼类网箱养殖、牡蛎筏式养殖和海带筏式养殖3种养殖区内外分别进行大、中型和中、小型浮游动物群落及相关环境因子的四季研究。结果显示,牡蛎养殖区内大、中型浮游动物群落结构变化明显,夏、秋季优势种太平洋纺锤水蚤的优势度下降,冬季优势种腹针胸刺水蚤的优势度上升;网箱养殖区内浮游动物群落变化不明显,变化主要为大、中型浮游动物优势种,春、冬季腹针胸刺水蚤的优势度下降,秋季优势种种类组成变化明显;海带养殖区内浮游动物群落和优势种变化均不明显。此外,3种养殖方式对浮游动物的生物量、丰度和α多样性均未产生明显影响。结合象山港的水文特征和养殖区内外的环境因子,研究表明,牡蛎养殖区浮游动物群落变化是牡蛎滤食行为和铁港水交换能力差的综合结果,而浮游动物优势种变化可能与水体总磷含量较高有关;因目前网箱养殖规模小且西沪港水动力条件较好,网箱区内局部环境和浮游动物的变化较小;海带养殖因面积小且仅春、冬季养殖,不足以对水质和浮游动物产生影响。此外,本研究显示不同环境中,大、中型浮游动物群落结构的变异较中、小型浮游动物明显,这可能与中、小型浮游动物群落的稳定性较高有关。

关 键 词:鱼类养殖  海带养殖  牡蛎养殖  浮游动物  海湾
收稿时间:2016/10/16 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/1/18 0:00:00

Effects of three different aquaculture activities on zooplankton community in Xiangshan Bay
DU Ping,XU Xiaoqun,XU Xudan,ZHOU Konglin,LUO Xin,CHEN Quanzhen,ZENG Jiangning,SHOU Lu and ZHANG Demin.Effects of three different aquaculture activities on zooplankton community in Xiangshan Bay[J].Journal of Fisheries of China,2017,41(11):1719-1733.
Authors:DU Ping  XU Xiaoqun  XU Xudan  ZHOU Konglin  LUO Xin  CHEN Quanzhen  ZENG Jiangning  SHOU Lu and ZHANG Demin
Institution:School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Marine Environmental Monitoring Center of Guangxi, Beihai 536000, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China,Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, State Oceanic Administration, Second Institute of Oceanography, Hangzhou 310012, China and School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Abstract:To explore the effects of three different aquacultures on planktonic ecosystem in semi-closed bay, the macro- and meso-zooplankton community, meso- and micro-zooplankton community and 12 kinds of associated environmental factors were studied inside and outside the fish cage aquaculture, kelp raft aquaculture, and farms in Xiangshan Bay via seasonal cruises during 2015.The results demonstrate that: compared with the control areas in the oyster farm, the macro- and meso-zooplankton community composition changed obviously, and the dominance of Acartia pacifica declined during summer and autumn, while that of Centropages abdominalis went up in winter;in the fish farm, the dominant species of macro- and meso-zooplankton changed, with the dominance of Centropages abdominalis declining during spring and winter, and dominant species composition changing obviously in autumn; however, in the kelp farm, there was no marked change in zooplankton community;moreover, the effects of the three different aquacultures on biomass, abundance and α-diversity of zooplankton community were nonsignificant.Analyzing the above results, combined with the hydrological characteristics in Xiangshan Bay and the environmental factors inside and outside the farms, we considered, the change in zooplankton community was a comprehensive result of oyster filter-feeding behavior and the poor water exchange capacity in Tie Harbor, and the zooplankton dominant species variation might relate to elevated total phosphorus content in the farm; in our study, fish cage aquaculture effects on environment and zooplankton were less, mainly due to the small aquaculture scale recently and good hydrodynamic condition in Xihu Harbor; the kelp aquaculture was inadequate to influence the water quality and zooplankton community, because of its small cultural scale and short cultural period every year (only in spring and winter).In addition, the variation in macro- and meso-zooplankton was more obvious than that in meso- and micro-zooplankton, which may be related to the higher stability in meso- and micro-zooplankton community.
Keywords:fish aquaculture  kelp aquaculture  oyster aquaculture  zooplankton  bay
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水产学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水产学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号