首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同投喂方式对鳙形态特征的影响
引用本文:许德高,李学梅,朱永久,张家波,杨德国.不同投喂方式对鳙形态特征的影响[J].水产学报,2016,40(6):873-881.
作者姓名:许德高  李学梅  朱永久  张家波  杨德国
作者单位:1. 中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,农业部淡水生物多样性保护重点实验室,湖北武汉430223;华中农业大学水产学院,湖北武汉430070;2. 中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,农业部淡水生物多样性保护重点实验室,湖北武汉430223;3. 华中农业大学水产学院,湖北武汉,430070
基金项目:十二五国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD25B05);国家自然科学基金(31502142)
摘    要:为分析不同投喂方式对鳙形态特征的影响,本研究采用了传统形态度量法和框架分析法构建了31个反映体型的形态比例性状,运用单因素方差分析、聚类分析、主成分分析和判别分析等统计方法对4种投喂方式下,施肥(组A)、施肥+1/2投饲(组B)、施肥+投饲(组C)、投饲(组D)总共56尾鳙的这些性状进行分析比较。方差分析结果显示,不同处理组间头高/体长、4–6/体长、5–6/体长、5–8/体长等7个比例性状无显著差异,其他24个性状差异显著,但头长/体长在组A、组C和组D中无显著差异。聚类分析结果显示,不同处理组分成2支,其中组A单独聚为一支,而组B、组C和组D共同聚为一支。主成分分析构建了7个主成分,累计贡献率达到了94.6%,其散点图显示,组B、组C和组D部分样本重叠在一起,与组A完全分开。以Bayes逐步判别分析方法选用了6个判别效果较好的比例性状,建立了4个种群的判别函数,不同处理组鳙判别准确率分别为92.7%、87.5%、64.3%和87.5%,说明了本结果的可靠性。结果表明,投饲养殖方式下鳙形态特征发生显著变化,但头部相关的主要比例性状无显著差异,头部至背鳍躯干部距离显著增大,形成了头部偏小的假象。本研究首次以数据结果阐释投饲养鳙仍符合人们喜食的大鱼头特征,为该养殖技术奠定了理论基础。

关 键 词:  投饲养殖  形态特征  多元统计分析
收稿时间:2016/2/19 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/3/29 0:00:00

Morphological variations of bighead carp(Aristichthys nobilis) fed by feedstuff
XU Degao,LI Xuemei,ZHU Yongjiu,ZHANG Jiabo and YANG Deguo.Morphological variations of bighead carp(Aristichthys nobilis) fed by feedstuff[J].Journal of Fisheries of China,2016,40(6):873-881.
Authors:XU Degao  LI Xuemei  ZHU Yongjiu  ZHANG Jiabo and YANG Deguo
Institution:Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences,,,,,Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences,
Abstract:To elucidate the morphological variation of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) feeding by feedstuff, four populations (56 specimen) from four treatments as fertilization (group A), fertilization+ 1/2 feeding (group B), fertilization+ feeding (group C) and feeding (group D) were investigated, using the traditional morphological (one-way analysis of variance, cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and discriminant analysis) and truss network analysis. The four populations of bighead carp differed significantly (P<0.05) for 26 morphological proportional characters (e.g., TL/BL, BH/BL, SL/BL), while there were no difference for other characters as HH/BL, HL/BL, 4-6/BL, 5-6/BL between different groups. A cluster analysis indicated that the group B, group C and group D were more similar compared to group A. The principal component analysis yielded seven principal components with a cumulative contribution ratio of 94.63%. The scatter diagram of major principle components also showed group A completely separated from other three groups, while the latter overlapped together. The discriminant functions of the four populations of bighead carp were established based on 6 morphological characters that differed significantly among the populations. The accuracy of discrimination from four populations was 92.7%, 87.5%, 64.3% and 87.5%, respectively, indicating the reliability of discriminant functions. In summary, the morphological characteristics of bighead carp feeding feedstuff changed significantly. However, the morphological characters of fish head have not changed, while the trunk from head to the dorsal fin is significantly increased, in hence giving an illusion of smaller head. It is the first study to prove the bighead carp feeding feedstuff still meet the big head features people liking, laying the theoretical foundation for rearing bighead carp with feedstuff.
Keywords:Aristichthys nobilis  feedstuff feeding  morphological variation  multivariateanalysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水产学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水产学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号