Waste and particle management in a commercial, partially recirculating trout farm

The present case study, deals with a recently built aquaculture facility using 80–120 L s⁻¹ spring water for trout production. The farm consists of six raceways, discharging in a common outflow channel, leading to a drum filter equipped with 80 μm gauze. About 120 L s⁻¹ of the microscreen effluent is pumped back in the inflow channel of the six raceways. The remaining effluent is oxygenated with pure oxygen in gravity oxygenation units and led to two U-shaped raceways. The farm effluent is finally filtered by a drum filter with 63 μm mesh size. The microscreen backwash sludge is treated in a cone settler, where the sediments are extracted for agricultural manure application. The sedimentation supernatant is further led in a sub surface flow (SSF) constructed wetland prior to discharge.Due to the advanced effluent treatment within the farm, the total farm effect on the receiving effluent is kept to a minimum. The nutrient increase produced by the farm is only 0.03 mg L⁻¹ total phosphorous (TP), 1.09 mg L⁻¹ biological oxygen demand (BOD₅) and, 0.57 mg L⁻¹ total suspended solids (TSS) in the brook. Especially the incorporation of an intermediate microscreen prior to water recirculation, prevents leaching of dissolved nutrients from particulate matter, as large particles are effectively and as fast as possible removed from the water flow.At the pumping station, needed for water recirculation, the particle size distribution (PSD) was monitored with the previous microscreen in use and by-passed. When the screen was by-passed a significant crushing effect on PSD through pumping action was found. Through the removal of large particles, the crushing effect of the pumping station on the particles is prevented, as revealed by particle size distribution (PSD) measurement. Thus, leaching of dissolved nutrients is prevented twice.In consequence, the farm configuration can be recommended as an effective possibility for intensive trout production at sites with a small freshwater source and stringent effluent thresholds, even with the unexpected low treatment efficiencies measured for the microscreens. Both drum filters showed relative low treatment efficiencies of 33–53% for total suspended solids, respectively, while an efficiency of 70% should be expected from the measured PSD. With this impact, the farm still emitted a low nutrient amount, especially due to the highly effective offline microscreen backwash sludge treatment, where the SSF wetland efficiently reduced dissolved and particulate nutrients as nitrite (NO₂-N), nitrate (NO₃-N) and TSS. Thus this SSF wetland application might be suitable as a denitrification step in a closed recirculating trout farm.