首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Larviculture of the painted river prawn Macrobrachium carcinus in different culture systems
Institution:1. Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco – IPA, Departamento de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural – DEAT, Av. General San Martin, 1371, Bongi, Recife, PE, 50761-000, Brazil;2. Laboratório de Produção de Camarão – LPC, Centro de Ciências Agrárias/Universidade Estadual do Maranhão – UEMA, Cidade Universitária Campus Paulo VI, s/n, Jardim São Cristovão, São Luís, MA, 65055-310, Brazil;3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Aquicultura, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco – UFRPE, Recife, PE, 52171-900, Brazil;4. Centro de Aquicultura da Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil;5. Laboratório de Sistemas de Produção Aquícola, Departamento de Pesca e Aquicultura, UFRPE, Av. Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, Recife, PE, 52171-900, Brazil;1. Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey;2. Mediterranean Fisheries Research Production and Training Institute, 07192, Antalya, Turkey;3. Department of Gastronomy and Culinary Arts, Faculty of Tourism, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey;4. Chemical and Materials Engineering Dept, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;1. Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, 3-1-1, Minato-cho, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041-8611, Japan;2. Faculty of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, 3-1-1, Minato-cho, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041-8611, Japan;3. Faculty of Agriculture, Kindai University, 3327-204, Naka-machi, Nara 631-8505, Japan;4. Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kindai University, 3-4-1, Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan;5. Aquaculture Research Institute, Kindai University, 3153, Shirahama-cho, Nishimuro-gun, Wakayama 649-2211, Japan;6. Hatchery Aquaculture Technology and Production Center, Kindai University, 195, Keten, Setouchi-cho, Ohshima-gun, Kagoshima 894-1853, Japan;7. Furuno Electric Co., Ltd., 9-52, Ashihara-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 662-8580, Japan;1. Instituto Interamericano de Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Carretera Toluca-Atlacomulco km 14.5, Toluca, Estado de México, 50200, Mexico;2. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Toluca, Estado de México, 50130, Mexico
Abstract:The objective of this study was to evaluate different hatchery systems used for the larviculture of the Macrobrachium carcinus based on survival, larval development and production of post-larvae. The experimental culture was carried out in three phases designated as Phase I (Zoea VI to VIII – ZVI – VIII), Phase II (Zoea VIII to X – ZVIII – X), and Phase III (Zoea X to PL – ZX – PL), with densities of 30, 27.5 and 25 larvae / L, respectively. The M. carcinus larvae (ZVI) were reared in four culture systems, two being open (Greenwater – GW and Clearwater – CW) and two being closed (Biofloc – BFT and Bio-filter – RAS), distributed in twelve 10 L plastic containers, filled with 20 ppt brackish water, equipped with constant aeration, and water circulated by air lift and heated with thermostat (~30 °C). The GW treatment was maintained with Chlorophyceae algae in the density of 3–5 × 105 cells/mL. In the CW, the water was previously filtered through a 5 μm mesh screen, sterilized with 10 ppm active chlorine and, dechlorinated with vitamin C and subjected to aeration for 24 h. The BFT received water rich in bioflocs that was matured prior to the experiment and used molasses as a source of organic carbon. In the RAS, the culture water circulated through an external “Dry-Wet” biological filter. The feeding was carried out ad libitum four times daily, alternating a wet diet formula with a commercial diet, which was supplemented with newly hatched Artemia nauplii at a rate of 40–50 per larvae/day. Temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH were monitored daily and the salinity two times per week. Total ammonia, nitrite, nitrate, orthophosphate, alkalinity, total suspended solids, chlorophyll-a, COD and BOD were also analyzed. The best water quality (P < 0.05) was obtained in the RAS, with 0.49 (±0.38), 0.23 (±0.22), and 9.0 (±1.5) mg/L of TAN, NO2-N and NO3-N, respectively. In the GW, the nitrogen species showed high fluctuations and higher concentrations at 2.32 (±1.68), 3.53 (±3.53) and 18.2 (±12.9) mg / L of TAN, NO2-N and NO3-N, respectively. Considering the three phases (ZVI – PL), the overall survival was 0.03, 1.97, 2.23 and 17.32 % for the BFT, CW, GW and RAS, respectively. When considering the phases separately, the survival in Phase I (ZVI – VIII) was highest in the GW system at 58.7 % while the RAS was the highest in Phases II (ZVIII – X) and III (ZX – PL) at 70.6 % and 60.3 %, respectively. The BFT showed 8.4 (±3.5) PL/L, which was higher (P < 0.05) than that obtained in the RAS (2.8 ± 1.2 PL/L) and the GW (1.3 ± 1.1 PL/L) and similar to that obtained in the CW (5.6 ± 2.0 PL/L). Thus, the larviculture for the M. carcinus may be optimized by adopting a multiphase management strategy, which the intermediate larval stages (ZVI – IX) are reared in the GW system and the final stages (ZX – PL) are reared in the BFT system.
Keywords:Freshwater prawn  Biofilter  Biofloc  Greenwater  Clearwater  Larval survival
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号