首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中稻头季稻与再生稻的品质比较研究
引用本文:刘国华,邓化冰,陈立云,肖应辉,唐文邦.中稻头季稻与再生稻的品质比较研究[J].杂交水稻,2002,17(1):45-47.
作者姓名:刘国华  邓化冰  陈立云  肖应辉  唐文邦
作者单位:湖南农业大学植物科技学院,湖南,长沙,410128
基金项目:国家“86 3”计划项目 (2 0 0 1AA2 4 10 2 3)
摘    要:对20个中稻品种(或组合)头季稻与再生稻的碾米品质、外观品质、蒸煮品质及营养品质进行了分析.结果表明,除精米粒形(长宽比)头季稻与再生稻无多大变化外,糙米率、垩白粒率、垩白度头季稻均高于再生稻,而糊化温度的碱消值则低于再生稻;头季稻与再生稻的精米率、整精米率、胶稠度、直链淀粉含量及蛋白质含量品种(组合)间存在明显差异,但大多数品种(组合)再生稻的精米率、整精米率比头季稻高 ,而直链淀粉和蛋白质含量则比头季稻低;总体评价是再生稻的米质比头季稻好.

关 键 词:中稻  头季稻  再生稻  稻米品质
文章编号:1005-3956(2002)01-0045-03
修稿时间:2001年9月3日

Comparison of Grain Quality between Main and Ratooning Crops of Middle-season Rice
Comparison of Grain Quality between Main and Ratooning Crops of Middle-season Rice.Comparison of Grain Quality between Main and Ratooning Crops of Middle-season Rice[J].Hybrid Rice,2002,17(1):45-47.
Authors:Comparison of Grain Quality between Main and Ratooning Crops of Middle-season Rice
Abstract:The grain qualities including milling, appearence, cooking and nutrition qualities of 20 middle season rice varieties (hybrid crosses) were compared between their main cropping rice and ratooning cropping rice. The results showed that: a) Brown rice recovery, chalky rice rate and chalkiness of main rice were higher than those of the ratooning rice; gelatinization temperature of the former was lower than that of the latter; there was not significant difference in grain shape between the main and ratooning crops. b)Milled rice recovery and head rice recovery of ratooning rice were higher than those of the main crop for most varieties, however, amylose content and protein content of the former were lower than those of the latter. It is concluded that the grain quality of ratooning rice is better than that of main rice.
Keywords:middle  season rice  main crop  ratooning crop  rice quality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号