“盛世造园”说考论

营造园林耗资较大、用时较长,盛世繁荣安定、物阜民丰,造园相对更容易实现,"盛世造园"逐渐成为时下学术界一个常见不疑的论断。实际上,在中国园林历史上,盛世造园的实例有之,乱世兴园的现象也很多;古代文人园林多为写意性的精神家园,对盛世的物质基础依赖程度相对较低。因此,"盛世"与"造园"之间并非简单的因果顺承关系,"盛世造园"这一论断不仅存在学术认知上偏谬,对当代园林事业发展也产生了一定的误导影响。

Textual Criticism of the Inference of “Flourishing Age with Garden Flourishing”

Building a garden costs a lot of money and takes a long time. Flourishing ages were peaceful and prosperous. In Flourishing ages, products were abound, people lived in plenty and gardening were more easier. “Flourishing Age with Garden Flourishing” slowly became an inference for landscape architecture nowadays. In fact, in Chinese gardening history, there were as many gardens constructed in troubled times. Chinese ancient literati garden emphasized imagery character and depended on materials less relatively. Therefore, the relationship between “Flourishing Age” and “Garden Flourishing" wasn’t a causality. The inference of “Flourishing Age with Garden Flourishing” not only had academic bias, but also misled the development of modern landscape architecture.