首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

目标规划与轮伐公式确定森林收获的比较分析
引用本文:李婷婷,陆元昌,刘宪钊,王霞,庞丽峰.目标规划与轮伐公式确定森林收获的比较分析[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(1):38-44.
作者姓名:李婷婷  陆元昌  刘宪钊  王霞  庞丽峰
作者单位:中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所, 北京 100091;中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所, 北京 100091;中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所, 北京 100091;北京林业大学, 北京 100083;中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所, 北京 100091;北京林业大学, 北京 100083;中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所, 北京 100091
基金项目:公益性科研院所基金多功能森林经营动态监测及数据集成技术(IFRIT201101)课题和多功能经营案例(CAFYBB2010001-02)研究课题支持。
摘    要:利用中国林科院热带林业实验研究中心2009年森林资源二类调查数据,分别利用目标线性规划与传统森林轮伐公式计算热林中心马尾松纯林和杉木纯林用材林年采伐量,比较分析同一个经理期(2009—2019年)两种计算方法的不同;结果表明:轮伐公式计算的采伐量一般偏大,且目标规划单位面积年经济收益是轮伐公式获得经济效益的10 20倍。利用目标规划法在同时实现材积收获量最大、出材量最大、净现值收益最大的目标前提下,对森林结构进行调整,使资源分布满足可持续经营的要求,即尽可能达到法正状态。

关 键 词:目标规划  马尾松  杉木  轮伐公式  采伐量
收稿时间:2013/2/15 0:00:00

Comparison and Analysis of Using Goal Programming and Rotation Cutting Formulas to Determine Forest Harvest
LI Ting-ting,LU Yuan-chang,LIU Xian-zhao,WANG Xia and PANG Li-feng.Comparison and Analysis of Using Goal Programming and Rotation Cutting Formulas to Determine Forest Harvest[J].Forest Research,2014,27(1):38-44.
Authors:LI Ting-ting  LU Yuan-chang  LIU Xian-zhao  WANG Xia and PANG Li-feng
Institution:Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Abstract:Based the forest resource inventory data of Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, the annual cut of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) and Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) timber forests were calculated by multi-goal programming and traditional rotation cutting formulas separately, and the different results for the same management period (2009-2019) from these two approaches were discussed. It shows that the harvest is generally larger by rotation cutting formulas, and the annual economic benefits of unit area by goal programming is 10-20 times that by rotation cutting formulas. Application of goal programming in forest harvest can regulate forest structure for normal forest, make forest better and achieve the maximum timber harvest and production and maximum net present value.
Keywords:goal programming  Masson pine  Chinese-fir  rotation cutting formulas  forest harvest
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《林业科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《林业科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号