首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

宁杂21号不同种植方式效益比较
引用本文:浦惠明,龙卫华,刘雪基,胡茂龙,高建芹.宁杂21号不同种植方式效益比较[J].农业科学与技术,2014(10):1781-1788.
作者姓名:浦惠明  龙卫华  刘雪基  胡茂龙  高建芹
作者单位:1. 江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所/农业部长江下游棉花与油菜重点实验室,江苏南京,210014
2. 江苏省扬州市江都区农业技术推广中心,江苏扬州,225200
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划(2010BAD01B06);江苏省科技支撑计划(BE2012327);江苏省农业科技自主创新基金(CX(14)2003)。Supported by National Key Technology Research and Development Program,Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Support Program,Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology lnnovation Fund (CX
摘    要:以杂交油菜新品种宁杂21号为材料,采用大面积生产上常见的3种移栽种植和2种直播种植方式,在高产栽培条件下研究不同种植方式的产量水平和经济效益,分析比较不同种植方式的用工、农资和农机成本,探索降低生产成本、提高经济效益的途径。结果表明,5种种植方式都能取得高产,平均产量达到3 282.30 kg/hm2,变幅为2 899.50~3 642.00kg/hm2,虽然移栽种植的产量水平和总产值分别高于直播种植429.25和2 189.18元/hm2,但直播种植的生产成本低于移栽种植2 098.81元/hm2,经济效益基本持平。试验结果还表明在油菜生产成本中,人工成本占60%以上,其中收获用工成本又占人工成本的50%左右。因此,在目前生产条件下,应用直播种植、机械收获,可有效降低生产成本,提高油菜经济效益。

关 键 词:油菜  移栽种植  直播种植  生产成本  经济效益

Comparison of Benefits from Different Planting Models of Ningza No.21
Huiming PU,Weihua LONG,Xueji LlU,Maolong HU,Jianqin GAO.Comparison of Benefits from Different Planting Models of Ningza No.21[J].Agricultural Science & Technology,2014(10):1781-1788.
Authors:Huiming PU  Weihua LONG  Xueji LlU  Maolong HU  Jianqin GAO
Institution:Huiming PU, Weihua LONG, Xueji LlU, Maolong HU, Jianqin GAO (1. Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China; 2. Jiangdu District Agricultural Technology Promotion Center, Yangzhou 225200, China)
Abstract:Ningza No.21, a new hybrid rapeseed cultivar, was used as the test mate-rial in this study. The common planting models in large-scale production (3 trans-planting models and 2 direct-seeding models) were adopted. Based on the high-yield cultivation, the yield and economic benefits of different planting models were investi-gated. ln addition, the labor costs, agricultural production materials costs and agri-cultural machinery costs of different planting model were analyzed to explore the low-costs and high-economic benefits planting model. The results showed the yields of the 5 planting models were al relatively high with average yield of 3 282.30 kg/hm2, ranging from 2 899.50 to 3 642.00 kg/hm2. Although the average yield and output value of transplanting models were higher than that of direct-seedling models by 429.25 kg/hm2 and 2 189.18 yuan/hm2 respectively, the production costs of trans-planting models were higher than that of direct-seedling model by 2 098.81 yuan/hm2 and the economic benefits were basical y equal. Among the costs of rapeseed pro-duction, the labor costs accounted for more than 60%. ln the labor costs, the har-vesting labor costs represented about 50%. Therefore, under current production con-ditions, the direct seeding and mechanized harvesting should be adopted in the rapeseed production to reduce production costs and improve economic benefits.
Keywords:Rapeseed  Transplanting cultivation  Direct-seeding cultivation  Production costs  Economic benefits
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号