首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

控释氮肥对洋葱-棉花套作体系产量及土壤氮含量的影响
引用本文:田晓飞,李成亮,张民,谢志华,路艳艳,郑文魁,耿计彪.控释氮肥对洋葱-棉花套作体系产量及土壤氮含量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2015,34(4):745-752.
作者姓名:田晓飞  李成亮  张民  谢志华  路艳艳  郑文魁  耿计彪
作者单位:土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018,山东省济宁市农业科学院, 山东 济宁 272000,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018,土肥资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 国家缓控释肥工程技术研究中心, 山东农业大学资源与环境学院, 山东 泰安 271018
基金项目:山东省现代农业产业技术体系棉花创新团队项目(鲁农科技字[2012]26号)、"十二五"国家科技支撑计划(2011BAD11B01;2011BAD11B02);国家"948"重点项目(2011-G30)
摘    要:2012—2013年在济宁市鱼台县,通过大田试验研究了速效氮肥和控释氮肥在0、100、200、300 kg·hm-2 4个氮素水平下对洋葱-棉花套作体系产量及土壤氮素含量变化的影响。结果表明:氮素用量200、300 kg·hm-2时,速效氮肥和控释氮肥处理棉花产量显著高于氮素用量100 kg·hm-2处理;氮素用量100、200 kg·hm-2时,控释氮肥棉花产量较速效氮肥处理分别显著增加17.3%和7.7%;施氮200 kg·hm-2的控释氮肥处理较氮素用量100 kg·hm-2的控释氮肥处理的籽棉显著增产14.5%,但与施氮300 kg·hm-2的控释氮肥处理相比差异不显著。控释氮肥较速效氮肥更能提高0~20 cm土层NO-3-N的含量,但对土壤中NH+4-N含量无显著影响。施用控释氮肥能够提高洋葱和棉花产量,施氮量为200 kg·hm-2的控释氮肥处理为本试验条件下的最优施肥处理。

关 键 词:氮肥类型  氮肥用量  洋葱产量  棉花产量  土壤氮含量
收稿时间:2014/11/20 0:00:00

Effects of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yields and Soil Nitrogen in Onion-Cotton Intercropping System
TIAN Xiao-fei,LI Cheng-liang,ZHANG Min,XIE Zhi-hu,LU Yan-yan,ZHENG Wen-kui and GENG Ji-biao.Effects of Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yields and Soil Nitrogen in Onion-Cotton Intercropping System[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2015,34(4):745-752.
Authors:TIAN Xiao-fei  LI Cheng-liang  ZHANG Min  XIE Zhi-hu  LU Yan-yan  ZHENG Wen-kui and GENG Ji-biao
Institution:National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China,National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China,National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China,Jining Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Institute of Cotton Research, Jining 272000, China,National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China,National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China and National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Slow and Controlled Release Fertilizers, College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
Abstract:Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer(CRN) could meet plants' demands for nitrogen while reducing nitrogen losses and thus water pollution. A field experiment was conducted in Jining city, Shandong Province, from September 2012 to October 2013, to study the crop growth and soil nitrogen levels in onion and cotton intercropping system under common fertilizer(CN) and CRN at four nitrogen(N) rates of 0, 100, 200, and 300 kg·hm-2. Results showed that the cotton yield increased with N applications. At 200 and 300 kg·hm-2, the cotton yields were respectively 17.3% and 7.7% higher in CRN than in CN. In CRN treatments, the cotton yield at 200 kg·hm-2 was 7.7% and 14.5% higher than that at CN(200 kg·hm-2) and CRN(100 kg·hm-2), respectively. However, no difference was found in the cotton yield between 200 kg·hm-2 and 300 kg·hm-2 CRN treatments. At 100, 200, and 300 kg·hm-2, onion yields were respectively 19.6%, 2.6% and 6.7% higher in CRN than in CN. Soil NO3--N concentrations in 0~20 cm in CRN treatment were significantly lower than in CN treatment. Soil NH4+-N contents were not affected by N treatments. These results suggest that 200 kg·hm-2 of CRN would be an optimum fertilizer rate under the experimental condition.
Keywords:nitrogen fertilizer type  nitrogen rate  onion yield  cotton production  soil inorganic nitrogen
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号