首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

保水剂对氮肥氨挥发和氮磷钾养分淋溶损失的影响
引用本文:杜建军,苟春林,崔英德,曲东.保水剂对氮肥氨挥发和氮磷钾养分淋溶损失的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(4):1296-1301.
作者姓名:杜建军  苟春林  崔英德  曲东
作者单位:1. 仲恺农业技术学院环境科学与工程系,广东,广州,510225;广东工业大学机电工程学院,广东,广州,510090;仲恺农业技术学院绿色化工研究所,广东,广州,510225
2. 仲恺农业技术学院环境科学与工程系,广东,广州,510225;农业部枸杞产品质量监督检验测试中心,宁夏,银川,750002;西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西,杨凌,712100
3. 仲恺农业技术学院绿色化工研究所,广东,广州,510225
4. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院,陕西,杨凌,712100
基金项目:国家自然科学基金;广东省科技厅科技计划;广东省教育厅自然科学基金
摘    要:采用“静态吸收法”和“土柱淋溶法”室内模拟试验,研究了保水剂施入土壤后对尿素氨挥发以及对尿素、磷酸一铵、氯化钾养分淋溶损失的影响.结果表明,土壤中施入保水剂后,尿素氨挥发量显著降低,并随着保水剂用量的增加效果更加明显.氨挥发量的降低与土壤含水量、土壤脲酶活性和土壤pH有关.土壤含水量较高时,土壤脲酶活性和土壤pH较低,尿素氨挥发量也较少,土壤含水量为田间持水量的75%和100%时,施用0.05%~0.80%的保水剂,尿素累积氨挥发量分别较不施保水剂处理减少8.97%~47.65%和16.78%~72.40%.土壤中施入保水剂同样能减少氮、磷、钾养分的淋溶损失,对于氮、钾养分来说,随着保水剂用量的增加,养分淋失量显著减少,但对于磷素养分来说,养分淋失量并不随着保水剂用量的增加而减少.施用0.05%~0.20%的保水剂时,氮、磷、钾养分累积淋失量分别较较不施保水剂处理减少13.60%~39.62%、28.31%~16.96%和6.76%~24.55%.

关 键 词:保水剂  氨挥发  养分淋溶损失
文章编号:1672-2043(2007)04-1296-06
修稿时间:2006-10-06

Effects of Water Retaining Agent on Ammonia Volatilization and Nutrient Leaching Loss from N, P and K Fertdizers
DU Jian-jun,GOU Chun-lin,CUI Ying-de,QU Dong.Effects of Water Retaining Agent on Ammonia Volatilization and Nutrient Leaching Loss from N, P and K Fertdizers[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2007,26(4):1296-1301.
Authors:DU Jian-jun  GOU Chun-lin  CUI Ying-de  QU Dong
Institution:1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Zhongkai University of Agricultural and Technology, Guangzhou 510225, China; 2. Faculty of Electromechanical Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China; 3. Institute of Green Chemi- cal Engineering, Zhongkai University of Agricultural and Technology, Guangzhou 510225, China; 4. The Supervision and Testing Center for Lycium Quality, Ministry of Agriculture, Yinchuan 750002, China; 5. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A F University, Yangling 712100, China
Abstract:Static adsorption and soil column leaching methods were used to study the effect of water retaining agent (WRA) in soils on ammonia volatilization from urea and nutrients leaching loss from urea, monoamonium phosphate and potassium chloride. The results showed that WRA strongly restrained ammonia volatilization. The amount of ammonia volatilization obviously decreased with the increase of WRA application level. The decrease of the amount of ammonia volatilization was closely related to soil water content, soil urease activity and pH value. When the soil water content was higher, the soil urease activity and pH value were lower, the amount of ammonia volatilization was fewer. When the soil water content were 75% and 100% of field water capacity with 0.05%~0.80% WRA applied, the total accumulated amount of ammonia volatilization decreased by 8.97%~47.65% and 16.78%~72.40% compared with that of the controls, respectively. Applying WRA into soils also could reduce leaching loss of N, P and K nutrients. For N and K nutrients, the leaching loss amount significantly decreased with the increase of WRA application level, but for P nutrient, it did not. When the application level ranged from 0.05% to 0.2%, the total accumulated amount of leaching loss of N, P and K decreased by 13.60%~39.62%, 28.31%~16.96% and 6.76%~24.55% compared with that of the controls, respectively.
Keywords:water retaining agent  ammonia volatilization  nutrient leaching loss
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号