首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

大宝山矿区某农田蔬菜重金属污染状况及健康风险评估
引用本文:邹素敏,杜瑞英,文典,陈岩,王富华,赵迪,朱娜.大宝山矿区某农田蔬菜重金属污染状况及健康风险评估[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,33(6):568-575.
作者姓名:邹素敏  杜瑞英  文典  陈岩  王富华  赵迪  朱娜
作者单位:广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;华中农业大学资源与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430070;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;华中农业大学资源与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430070;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;华中农业大学资源与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430070;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640,广东省农业科学院农产品公共监测中心,广东 广州 510640;华中农业大学资源与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430070;农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室(广州), 广东 广州 510640
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41401367);广东省省长专项
摘    要:本研究通过大田试验,在对大宝山矿区某农田蔬菜中重金属As、Hg、Pb、Cd、Cr分析测试的基础之上,运用单因子污染指数法和综合污染指数法对该农田蔬菜的重金属污染状况进行评价;同时应用健康风险评估模型对人群经食物链途径长期食用本地产蔬菜可能产生的健康风险进行评估,以期为蔬菜的安全生产以及人体健康提出合理的意见和建议。结果表明,农田土壤中重金属As、Hg、Cr、Cd、Pb的含量分别是国家土壤环境质量二级标准的0.875、0.900、0.373、2.863倍和0.305倍,可以看出这5种重金属中只有Cd的含量超过了国家土壤环境质量二级标准。蔬菜重金属污染结果表明,蔬菜综合污染指数P范围在0.412~3.339,均值为1.155,属于轻度污染。蔬菜单因子污染指数PAs范围在0.013~0.085,均值为0.030;PHg范围在0.000~0.154,均值为0.076;PPb的范围在0.105~1.255,均值为0.343;PCd范围在0.563~4.609,均值为1.536;PCr范围在0.008~0.360,均值为0.091;可以看出该蔬菜主要受到Cd污染。蔬菜重金属污染的健康风险评估结果表明:17种蔬菜整体而言,Risk的平均值为3.50×10-5 a-1,表示该批蔬菜品种重金属污染情况对人体健康存在一定的风险,但风险尚可接受;RiskT为3.50×10-5 a-1,表明该批蔬菜品种中致癌重金属对人体健康存在一定的风险,但风险尚可接受,且在致癌风险中RiskCd > RiskCr > RiskAs > RiskPbHIT为4.89×10-10 a-1,则表明该批蔬菜品种中非致癌重金属污染对人体健康存在的风险甚微,且在非致癌风险中HIPb>HIHg

关 键 词:大宝山  农田蔬菜  重金属污染  风险评估
收稿时间:2016/4/19 0:00:00

Heavy Metals Pollution in Vegetables Grown on Some Farmlands Around Dabaoshan Mine and Its Healthy Risk Evaluation
ZOU Su-min,DU Rui-ying,WEN Dian,CHEN Yan,WANG Fu-hu,ZHAO Di and ZHU Na.Heavy Metals Pollution in Vegetables Grown on Some Farmlands Around Dabaoshan Mine and Its Healthy Risk Evaluation[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science( J. Agro-Environ. Sci.),2016,33(6):568-575.
Authors:ZOU Su-min  DU Rui-ying  WEN Dian  CHEN Yan  WANG Fu-hu  ZHAO Di and ZHU Na
Institution:Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China,Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China,Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China,Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China,Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China,Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China and Public Monitoring Center for Agro-product of Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China;College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-products(Guangzhou), Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510640, China
Abstract:This study used the approaches of the single factor pollution index and the comprehensive factor pollution index to evaluate the heavy-metals pollution in vegetables by analyzing the data of the heavy metals(As, Hg, Cr, Cd, Pb) contents in vegetables grown around the area of Dabaoshan mine. Synchronously considering the potential healthy risks of the local people from long-term consumption of vegetables, we also applied the health risk assessment model to evaluate the health risks of vegetables polluted by heavy metals. The results showed that the contents of As, Hg, Cr, Cd, Pb in this farmland soil were 0.875, 0.900, 0.373, 2.863, 0.305 times as the threshold values from the national second-grading standard of environmental quality assessment for soils respectively, suggesting that only Cd content in soil was beyond the standard level. The comprehensive pollution index of heavy metal pollution in vegetables ranged from 0.412 to 3.339 with the mean value being of 1.155, which belonged to the level of light pollution. The single factor pollution indexes of As, Hg, Pb, Cd and Cr were 0.412~3.339, 0.000~0.154, 0.105~1.255, 0.563~4.609 and 0.008~0.360 respectively, and the means of these five heavy metals were 0.030, 0.076, 0.343, 1.536 and 0.091 respectively, indicating that the pollution of vegetables was mainly suffered from Cd. Additionally, results from the data of health risk assessment of the heavy metal pollution in 17 vegetables showed:the mean of the total risk was 3.50×10-5 a-1, suggesting that the situation of heavy metal pollution in vegetable varieties had a certain risk to human health, but the risk was acceptable; the mean of the carcinogenic risk for human health was 3.50×10-5 a-1, this meant that the situation of heavy metal pollution in vegetable varieties had a certain risk to human health of the carcinogenic risk, but was acceptable with a degree order of the carcinogenic risk was RiskCd > RiskCr > RiskAs > RiskPb; the total value from the non-carcinogenic risk was 4.89×10-10 a-1, indicating that the non-carcinogenic risk showed little effects on human health with a order of HIPb>HIHg.
Keywords:Dabaoshan  farmland vegetables  heavy metal pollution  healthy risk evaluation
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农业环境科学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号