首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国干白面条品质评价方法研究
引用本文:雷激,张艳,王德森,闫俊,何中虎.中国干白面条品质评价方法研究[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(12):2000-2005.
作者姓名:雷激  张艳  王德森  闫俊  何中虎
作者单位:1. 西华大学生物工程学院,成都,610039
2. 中国农业科学院作物育种栽培研究所/国家小麦改良中心,北京,100081
3. 中国农业科学院作物育种栽培研究所/国家小麦改良中心,北京,100081;CIMMYT中国办事处,北京,100081
基金项目:863计划(2002AA207003),973重大基础研究发展规划(2002CB111300),国家自然科学基金(30270822)资助
摘    要:以16个品质差异较大的小麦品种(系)为材料,研究籽粒和面粉特性对面条品质的影响,用色度仪和质构仪分别测定面粉与面条的颜色及面条质地特性,按商业部1993年标准对面条品质进行感官评价。结果表明,面条的外观品质和质地结构是籽粒硬度、面粉灰分、蛋白质含量和质量及淀粉特性综合作用的结果。用色度仪代替人为感官评价对煮熟面条颜色进行定量测定,二者的相关系数为0.73。质构仪TPA指标硬度能较好反映面条表观状态、适口性、韧性和总分,相关系数分别为0.54、0.70、0.56和0.66,达5%或1%显著水平;胶着性也能较好反映面条表观状态、适口性和总分,r为0.56、0.66和0.59,达5%或1%显著水平;弹性则与面条粘性呈显著负相关,r=-0.61。因此,用质构仪定量测定面条软硬度和胶着性,有助于客观评价面条的表观状态、适口性和总分。

关 键 词:普通小麦  面条品质  色度仪  质构仪  感官评价
收稿时间:2003-10-10

Methods for Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Dry White Chinese Noodles
LEI Ji,ZHANG Yan,WANG De-sen,YAN Jun,HE Zhong-hu.Methods for Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Dry White Chinese Noodles[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2004,37(12):2000-2005.
Authors:LEI Ji  ZHANG Yan  WANG De-sen  YAN Jun  HE Zhong-hu
Institution:LEI Ji1,ZHANG Yan2,WANG De-sen2,YAN Jun2,HE Zhong-hu2,3
Abstract:Sixteen wheat cultivars and advanced lines with wide variation in quality traits were used to evaluate grain and flour quality characteristics and their influence on dry white Chinese noodles (DWCN). The color of flour, noodle sheet, and cooked noodle was measured using Minolta CR-310. DWCN texture was evaluated by texture profile analysis (TPA) using Texture Analyzer and trained panelists according to the Chinese standard method for noodle quality evaluation (SB/T10137-93) approved in 1993 by the Ministry of Commerce. It was observed that the DWCN quality was affected by grain hardness, flour ash, protein content and quality, and starch property. The color of cooked noodle could be tested using Minolta instead of sensory evaluation, their correlation coefficient is 0.73 (P<0.01). Hardness of TPA parameters was significantly associated with noodle appearance, firmness, elasiticity, and total score of sensory evaluation, with r=0.54, 0.70, 0.56 and 0.66, respectively. Gumminess of TPA parameters was also significantly correlated with noodle appearance, firmness, and total score, with r=0.56, 0.66 and 0.59, respectively. Springiness of TPA parameters was significant and negatively correlated with noodle stickiness, with r=-0.61. Therefore, sensory evaluation of noodle appearance, firmness, and total score is recommended for noodle evaluation through hardness and gumminess of TPA parameters measured by Texture Analyzer.
Keywords:Common wheat  Noodle quality  Minolta CR310  Texture Analyzer  Sensory evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号