首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

转cry1Ac/sck基因抗虫水稻对稻田主要非靶标害虫的田间影响评价
引用本文:刘雨芳,贺玲,汪琼,胡斯琴,刘文海,陈康贵.转cry1Ac/sck基因抗虫水稻对稻田主要非靶标害虫的田间影响评价[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(6):1181-1189.
作者姓名:刘雨芳  贺玲  汪琼  胡斯琴  刘文海  陈康贵
作者单位:湖南科技大学生命科学学院及应用生态学研究所,湘潭,411201
基金项目:国家自然科学基金;国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);湖南省杰出青年科学基金;湖南省教育厅资助项目
摘    要: 【目的】研究转基因抗虫水稻对稻田主要非靶标害虫的田间影响。【方法】以转cry1Ac/ sck双基因抗虫水稻株系MSA、MSB、MSA4及其杂交稻21S/MSB、II-32A/MSB与KF6-304为材料,2002年在福建沙县、2003至2004在湖南湘潭县系统地开展了转基因水稻对稻田主要非靶标害虫白背飞虱、褐飞虱、叶蝉及稻瘿蚊的田间影响评价研究。【结果】秧苗期,MSA、MSB、21S/MSB、II-32A/MSB对稻飞虱产卵没有明显影响,稻飞虱在MSA4与KF6-304秧苗上的产卵量显著低于其对照,但所取样本上的产卵量都非常低。水稻移栽后,转基因水稻株系对白背飞虱与褐飞虱种群数量的影响有一定差异,但与它们的对照均无显著差异,整个生长期的数据分析也显示无显著差异。21S/MSB、II-32A/MSB上的叶蝉数量显著或极显著高于其对照,但叶蝉数量很低,单种叶蝉的种群数量则更低,且MSA、MSB、MSA4与KF6-304没有引起稻田叶蝉数量的明显变化。在成熟收割前,MSA、MSB有增加无效分蘖上葱管数的态势,但在水稻生长中期都对稻瘿蚊有高的抗性,能减少葱管的形成,降低标葱率。【结论】 转cry1Ac/sck 双基因抗虫水稻MSA、MSB、MSA4及杂交稻21S/MSB、II-32A/MSB与KF6-304不会引起关键非靶标水稻害虫数量的明显上升。导入相同外源基因的不同水稻株系对关键非靶标水稻害虫的影响在时间动态与程度上存在一定的差异,转基因作物生态安全评价需要进行个案分析。

关 键 词:转基因水稻  非靶标害虫  白背飞虱  褐飞虱  叶蝉  稻瘿蚊
收稿时间:2006-2-27
修稿时间:2006年2月22日

Effects of and Ecological Safety Insect-Resistant Cry1Ac/sck Transgenic Rice on Key Non-Target Pests in Paddy Fields
LIU Yu-fang,HE Ling,WANG Qiong,HU Si-qing,LIU Wen-hai,CHEN Kang-gui.Effects of and Ecological Safety Insect-Resistant Cry1Ac/sck Transgenic Rice on Key Non-Target Pests in Paddy Fields[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2007,40(6):1181-1189.
Authors:LIU Yu-fang  HE Ling  WANG Qiong  HU Si-qing  LIU Wen-hai  CHEN Kang-gui
Abstract:【Objective】To study the effects of resistant –insects transgenic rice on the key non-target pests in paddy fields. 【Method】The effects of three rice lines (MSA, MSB and MSA4) and three hybrid rice lines (21S/MSB, II-32A/MSB and KF6-304) of transgenic rice with a fused double genes of cry1Ac and sck (cry1Ac/sck rice) on the key non-target pests in paddy fields were investigated and the ecological safety of these cry1Ac/sck rice were evaluated in Sha County, Fujian Province in 2002 and in Xiangtan County, Huana Province in 2003, 2004, respectively.【Result】The significant differences in the fecundity of white back planthopper, Sogatella urcifera were not found between cry1Ac/sck rice MSA、MSB、21S/MSB、II-32A/MSB plots and their control, furthermore, both MSA4 and KF6-304 significant decreased the fecundity of S. urcifera during seedling. Whereas all six cry1Ac/sck rice lines sometimes increased or decreased the number of individuals of S. urcifera and brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens in the temporal dynamic, in most cases, there were no significant differences between cry1Ac/sck rice plots and their controls, and the situations in total quantity were similar. Both 21S/MSB and II-32A/MSB stimulated the populations of leafhoppers, however, there were no significant differences between other cry1Ac/sck rice plots and their controls and only a lower total quantity of leafhoppers in paddy fields. MSA and MSB showed high resistance to Pachydiplosis oryzae and decreased the number of shallot tracts and rate of rice clusters with shallot tracts at mid-stage of rice growth whereas these two cry1Ac/sck rice plots have the trends to increase the number of shallot tracts in null ramifications of rice before harvesing.【Result】 The results suggest that cry1Ac/sck rice lines, MSA, MSB, MSA4, 21S/MSB, II-32A/MSB and KF6-304 have not significant negative effects on key non-target pests in paddy fields.
Keywords:Transgenic rice  Non-target insect pests  Sogatella urcifera  Nilaparvata lugens  Leafhopper  Pachydiplosis oryzae
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号