首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再生稻和双季稻田CH4排放对比研究
引用本文:张浪,徐华勤,李林林,陈元伟,郑华斌,唐启源,唐剑武.再生稻和双季稻田CH4排放对比研究[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(12):2101-2113.
作者姓名:张浪  徐华勤  李林林  陈元伟  郑华斌  唐启源  唐剑武
作者单位:湖南农业大学农学院,长沙 410128
基金项目:国家水稻产业体系项目(CARS-01-26);国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300409);国家留学基金委项目(CSC201808430213);2017年大学生科技创新基金(2017ZK13)
摘    要:【目的】 为了探索生态可持续的稻作模式,对比研究了长江中下游地区双季稻和再生稻稻作模式的产量潜力和CH4排放特征,以此为选取绿色、生态经济可持续的稻作模式提供科学依据。【方法】 于2017—2018年依托湖南省益阳市大通湖区宏硕生态农业农机合作社科研基地,设置了双季稻和再生稻2种模式,对比分析了产量潜力、稻田生育期间CH4排放动态和稻田生态系统CH4季节性累积排放规律以及评估了单位产量稻田CH4排放。【结果】 试验期间,从产量方面来看,双季稻早稻产量为7.37 t·hm -2,再生稻头季产量为8.84 t·hm -2,头季相比早稻增产19.95%。双季稻晚稻产量为6.82 t·hm -2,再生稻再生季产量为3.39 t·hm -2,再生季相比晚稻减产50.29%。综合两季,双季稻总产量为14.19 t·hm -2,再生稻总产量为12.22 t·hm -2;从生育期间CH4排放动态来看,双季稻在分蘖期和齐穗期左右排放较强峰值,再生稻除了在分蘖期和齐穗期有较强的排放以外,其在施用促芽肥时也出现了小峰值。但总体双季稻的排放范围(- 0.06—1.30 μmol·m -2·s -1)要高于再生稻的排放范围(- 0.01—0.70 μmol·m -2·s -1);从稻田CH4季节性累积排放来看,双季稻CH4累积排放要高于再生稻。再生稻头季累积排放范围在23.90—266.59kg·hm -2,再生季累积排放范围在0.00—46.14 kg·hm -2。双季稻早稻季节累积排放范围在为35.57—251.29kg·hm -2,晚稻季节累积排放范围在为10.74—321.59 kg·hm -2。双季稻CH4季节累积排放A-B(两叶一心至分蘖后期)段>B-C(分蘖后期至齐穗期)段>C-D(齐穗期至成熟期)段,且全生育期双季稻累积排放达922.35 kg·hm -2。再生稻CH4累积排放B-C段>A-B段>C-D段,且全生育期CH4累积排放为609.74 kg·hm -2,即相比对照双季稻,再生稻CH4累积排放降低了33.89%;最后通过评估单位产量CH4排放可知,早稻单位产量CH4排放为0.069 kg·kg -1,头季单位产量CH4排放为0.062 kg·kg -1,头季相比早稻减少了10.14%;晚稻单位产量CH4排放为0.061 kg·kg -1,再生季单位产量CH4排放为0.018 kg·kg -1,再生季相比晚稻降低了70.49%。综合两季,双季稻单位产量CH4排放为0.065 kg·kg -1,再生稻单位产量CH4排放为0.050 kg·kg -1,再生稻相比双季稻降低了23.08%。 【结论】 从单位产量下CH4排放角度来看,在长江中下游双季稻的主产区扩大种植再生稻是为良策。

关 键 词:再生稻  双季稻  CH4  水稻产量  
收稿时间:2018-12-18

Comparative Study on CH4Emission from Ratoon Rice and Double-Cropping Rice Fields
ZHANG Lang,XU HuaQin,LI LinLin,CHEN YuanWei,ZHENG HuaBing,TANG QiYuan,TANG JianWu.Comparative Study on CH4Emission from Ratoon Rice and Double-Cropping Rice Fields[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2019,52(12):2101-2113.
Authors:ZHANG Lang  XU HuaQin  LI LinLin  CHEN YuanWei  ZHENG HuaBing  TANG QiYuan  TANG JianWu
Institution:College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128
Abstract:【Objective】In order to explore the ecologically sustainable rice planting model, the yield potential and CH4 emission characteristics of traditional double-cropping rice and emerging ratoon rice in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River were compared, so as to provide a scientific basis for selecting a green and ecologically sustainable rice farming model.【Method】In 2017-2018, relying on the research base of Hongshuo Eco-Agricultural Machinery Company in Datonghu District, Yiyang City, Hunan Province, two models of double-cropping rice and ratoon rice were set up, and the yield potential, CH4 emission dynamics and CH4 seasonal cumulative emission were compared and analyzed to evaluate unit yield CH4 emissions from paddy fields.【Result】During the experiment, from the aspect of yield, the yield of early rice was 7.37 t·hm -2, and the yield of main crop was 8.84 t·hm -2. Main crop yield increased by 19.95% compared with early rice; the late rice yield was 6.82 t·hm -2, and the ratoon crop was 3.39 t·hm -2. Compared with the late rice, the ratoon crop yield was reduced by 50.29%. In the two crops, the total yield of double-cropping rice was 14.19 t·hm -2, and the total yield of ratoon rice was 12.22 t·hm -2; in terms of CH4 emission dynamics, double-cropping rice was highly polluted in the tillering and full-heading. In addition to strong emissions in the tillering and full-heading, the ratoon rice also appeared small peak when applying budding fertilizer. However, the emission range of the overall double-cropping rice (-0.06 to 1.30 μmol·m -2·s -1) was higher than that of the ratoon rice (- 0.01 to 0.70 μmol·m -2·s -1); from the seasonal cumulative emission of CH4 in paddy fields, the cumulative emission of CH4 in double-cropping rice was higher than that in ratoon rice. The cumulative emission range of main crop was from 23.90 to 266.59 kg·hm -2, and the ratoon crop was from 0 to 4.61 kg·hm -2. The cumulative emission range of early rice was from 35.57 to 251.29 kg·hm -2, and the late rice was from10.74 to 321.59 kg·hm -2. CH4 seasonal cumulative emissions of double-cropping rice showed: A-B stage (two leaves-one heart to late-tillering) > B-C stage (late-tillering to full-heading) > C-D stage (full-heading to mature), and cumulative emissions of double-cropping rice during the whole growth period was up to 922.35 kg·hm -2. The cumulative emission of methane from ratoon rice was B-C stage>A-B stage>C-D stage, and the cumulative emission of methane during the whole growth period was 609.74 kg·hm -2. Compared with the double-cropping rice control, ratoon rice methane cumulative emissions decreased by 33.89%. Finally, by evaluating the unit yield methane emissions, the methane emission per unit yield of early rice was0.069 kg·kg -1, and the methane emission per unit yield of main crop was 0.062 kg·kg -1, which was 10.14% lower than that of early rice. The methane emission per unit yield of late rice was 0.061 kg·kg -1, the methane emission per unit of ratoon crop was0.018 kg·kg -1, and the ratoon crop was reduced by 70.49%, compared with the late rice. In the two crops, the methane emission per unit yield of double-cropping rice was 0.065 kg·kg -1, and the methane emission per unit yield of ratoon rice was 0.050 kg·kg -1, which was 23.08% lower than that of double-cropping rice.【Conclusion】Therefore, in terms of methane emissions per unit yield, expanding the cultivation of ratoon rice was a good strategy in the main producing areas of the double-cropping rice in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.
Keywords:ratoon rice  double-cropping rice  CH4  rice yield  
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号