首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

灌溉模式对保护地土壤可溶性有机碳与微生物量碳的影响#br#
引用本文:韩琳,张玉龙,金烁,王娇,魏岩岩,崔宁,魏巍. 灌溉模式对保护地土壤可溶性有机碳与微生物量碳的影响#br#[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(8): 1625-1633. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.08.011
作者姓名:韩琳  张玉龙  金烁  王娇  魏岩岩  崔宁  魏巍
作者单位:(沈阳农业大学土地与环境学院/农业部东北土壤与环境重点开放实验室);
基金项目:辽宁省农业科技攻关重大项目,辽宁省教育厅创新团队项目 
摘    要: 【目的】研究沟灌、渗灌、滴灌3种灌溉模式下,保护地土壤可溶性有机碳和微生物量碳在剖面中的分布特征。【方法】灌溉模式设沟灌、渗灌、滴灌3种,进行长达10年的长期定位灌溉试验。对长期定位灌溉试验保护地分层采集土壤样品,测定土壤总有机碳、可溶性有机碳、微生物量碳含量,分析其剖面分布特征。【结果】土壤总有机碳、可溶性有机碳和微生物碳含量均呈表层土壤最高、随土层深度增加而降低的分布趋势;但灌溉模式间差异明显,土壤总有机碳含量在0—10 cm、80—100 cm土层为沟灌>渗灌>滴灌,10—80 cm土层为渗灌>沟灌>滴灌;在0—100 cm剖面各层,可溶性有机碳含量均为沟灌>滴灌>渗灌,微生物量碳为滴灌>沟灌>渗灌。可溶性有机碳、微生物量碳占总有机碳的比率分别在4.98%—12.87%和1.48%—2.82%之间,其占总有机碳的比率均为滴灌>沟灌>渗灌。土壤可溶性有机碳、微生物量碳与土壤总有机碳含量呈显著的正相关关系。【结论】沟灌有利于土壤总有机碳、水溶性有机碳的积累,滴灌有利于微生物生物量碳的增加;渗灌相比较而言最不利于土壤有机质积累,不仅总有机碳含量低且水溶性含量占总有机碳的比例小。

关 键 词:  Verdana"  >保护地  不同灌溉模式  总有机碳  可溶性有机碳  微生物量碳
收稿时间:2009-09-10;

Effect of Different Irrigation Patterns on Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon and Microbial Biomass Carbon in Protected Field
HAN Lin,ZHANG Yu-long,JIN Shuo,WANG Jiao,WEI Yan-yan,CUI Ning,WEI Wei
. Effect of Different Irrigation Patterns on Soil Dissolved Organic Carbon and Microbial Biomass Carbon in Protected Field[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(8): 1625-1633. DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.08.011
Authors:HAN Lin  ZHANG Yu-long  JIN Shuo  WANG Jiao  WEI Yan-yan  CUI Ning  WEI Wei
Affiliation:(College of Land and Environmental Science, Shenyang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resource and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture)
Abstract:[Objective] The objective of this study was to research the distribution characteristics in the profile of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) in protected field under three irrigation patterns(subsurface irrigation, drip irrigation and furrow irrigation). [Method] The modes of irrigation are subsurface irrigation, drip irrigation and furrow irrigation. The same irrigation experiments were conducted for ten years. Soil samples at different depths within 0-100 cm were collected and the contents of soil total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and their profile distribution were determined. [Result] The results showed that the content of soil total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon were all showed the biggest amount in the soil surface and their content increased with layers' depth, but there were significant differences within irrigation methods. Soil total organic carbon content in 0-10 cm and 80-100 cm soil layers were furrow irrigation > subsurface irrigation > drip irrigation and in 10-80 cm soil layers was subsurface irrigation>furrow irrigation>drip irrigation. In 0-100 cm profile layers, DOC content showed furrow irrigation>drip irrigation> subsurface irrigation. MBC content showed drip irrigation >furrow irrigation >subsurface irrigation. The content of DOC and MBC accounted for 4.98%-12.87% and 1.48%-2.82% of the total organic carbon, respectively. Their ratios were all showed drip irrigation >furrow irrigation>subsurface irrigation. There were significant positive correlation between the content of soil dissolved organic carbon, the microbial biomass carbon and the soil total organic carbon content. [Conclusion] Furrow irrigation is conducive to accumulation of SOC and DOC; drip irrigation is conducive to an increase in MBC; subsurface irrigation is the least conducive to theaccumulation of soil organic matter comparison, not only the content of TOC is low but also the content of DOC in the ratio of TOC is small.
Keywords:protected field  different irrigation methods  total organic carbon (TOC)  dissolved organic carbon(DOC)  microbial biomass carbon (MBC)
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号