首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于机器学习结合植被指数阈值的水稻关键生育期识别
引用本文:杨振忠,方圣辉,彭漪,龚龑,王东.基于机器学习结合植被指数阈值的水稻关键生育期识别[J].中国农业大学学报,2020,25(1):76-85.
作者姓名:杨振忠  方圣辉  彭漪  龚龑  王东
作者单位:武汉大学 遥感信息工程学院, 武汉 430079,武汉大学 遥感信息工程学院, 武汉 430079,武汉大学 遥感信息工程学院, 武汉 430079,武汉大学 遥感信息工程学院, 武汉 430079,武汉大学 遥感信息工程学院, 武汉 430079
基金项目:中央高校基本科研基金(2042017kf0236);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(2013AA102401)
摘    要:为建立不依赖时序数据的水稻生育期识别模型,基于四波段辐射计(SKYE)获取的水稻全生育期每日的冠层光谱反射率数据,利用K近邻(k-nearest neighbors, KNN)、决策树(Decision trees)、支持向量机(Support vector machines, SVM)、随机森林(Random forests, RF)和梯度提升决策树(Gradient boosted decision trees, GBDT)共5种机器学习算法开展水稻生育期识别研究。结果表明:RF算法的识别准确率最高,达93.00%,KNN算法的识别准确率也达到了91.92%,其他3种算法的准确率也都超过90%。在此基础上,将建立的水稻生育期识别模型应用至无人机(UAV)影像数据,KNN算法适用性最好,识别准确率为83.54%,RF算法的适用性一般,识别准确率为74.38%,SVM算法的适用性最差,识别准确率仅为62.92%,但5种机器学习算法都容易错误地将抽穗扬花期识别为拔节孕穗期;而新构建的KNN算法结合可见光大气修正指数(Visible atmospherically resistant index,VARI)的水稻生育期识别模型对无人机数据的识别准确率可达86.04%,与单独应用KNN算法相比,对水稻各个生育期的识别精度更加均衡。

关 键 词:水稻  生育期  光谱反射率  机器学习  植被指数
收稿时间:2019/1/11 0:00:00

Recognition of the rice growth stage by machine learning combined with vegetation index threshold
YANG Zhenzhong,FANG Shenghui,PENG Yi,GONG Yan and WANG Dong.Recognition of the rice growth stage by machine learning combined with vegetation index threshold[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2020,25(1):76-85.
Authors:YANG Zhenzhong  FANG Shenghui  PENG Yi  GONG Yan and WANG Dong
Institution:School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079; China,School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079; China,School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079; China,School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079; China and School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079; China
Abstract:In order to establish the rice growth period recognition model independent of time series data, a four-band radiometer(SKYE)was firstly used to collect the daily canopy spectral reflectance during the whole growth stage of rice in this study. Five common machine learning algorithms including K nearest neighbors(KNN), decision trees, support vector machine(SVM), random forests(RF)and gradient boosted decision trees(GBDT)were then used to recognize the rice growth stages. The results showed that the recognition accuracies of RF and KNN were 93. 00% and 91. 92%, respectively. The accuracy of the rest three algorithms were all over 90%. On this basis, when the rice growth stage recognition model was applied to aerial-collected data, KNN algorithm displayed the best applicability with the recognition accuracy of 83. 54%, SVM algorithm showed the worst applicability with the recognition accuracy of 62. 92%, and the recognition accuracy of RF algorithm reached 74. 38%. However, all the five algorithms mistakenly recognized the heading and flowering stages as jointing and booting stages. Here, a KNN algorithm combined with visible atmospherically resistant index(VARI)for rice growth stage recognition was proposed. The recognition accuracy of the model for aerial-collected data was up to 86. 04%, which was more balanced than that using KNN algorithm alone in recognizing different growth stages of rice. The results showed that KNN algorithm combined with VARI had higher accuracy and better generalization ability in recognizing rice growth period.
Keywords:paddy rice  growth stage  spectral reflectance  machine learning  vegetation index
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号