首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

无芒雀麦地上生物量两种取样方法的比较
引用本文:杨洪琴,徐军,王建伟,刘秀莲,于俊平.无芒雀麦地上生物量两种取样方法的比较[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(2):82-88.
作者姓名:杨洪琴  徐军  王建伟  刘秀莲  于俊平
作者单位:1. 内蒙古通辽市科尔沁区草原工作站,通辽,028000
2. 内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,呼和浩特,010019
3. 内蒙古赤峰市松山区河南营子乡政府,赤峰,024000
4. 内蒙古乌兰察布市农牧业局草原科,乌兰察布,012000
5. 内蒙古乌兰察布市扶贫办,乌兰察布,012000
摘    要:以无芒雀麦种群为研究对象,用1种新的固定样方法和常用随机取样法,比较两种取样方法对同一研究对象——无芒雀麦的株高、密度、地上生物量及相应的动态变化的差异。结果表明:2种取样方法获得的数据有差异;方法1(固定样方法)在反映无芒雀麦的地上生物量动态变化时,能在株高和密度的背景值一致的基础上进行,是准确研究无芒雀麦的地上生物量变化规律的取样方法。

关 键 词:取样方法  生物量  无芒雀麦
文章编号:1009-3575(2007)02-0082-07
修稿时间:2006-10-18

THE DIFFERENCE OF TWO SAMPLING METHODS ON ABOVEGROUP BIOMASS OF BROMUS INERMIS
YANG Hong-qin,XU Jun,WANG Jian-wei,LIU Xiu-lian,YU Jun-ping.THE DIFFERENCE OF TWO SAMPLING METHODS ON ABOVEGROUP BIOMASS OF BROMUS INERMIS[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition),2007,28(2):82-88.
Authors:YANG Hong-qin  XU Jun  WANG Jian-wei  LIU Xiu-lian  YU Jun-ping
Institution:1.Kerqin District Rangeland Station of Tongliao City in Inner Mongolia,Tongliao 028000,China;2.College of Ecology and Environmental science of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot 010019,China;3.Henanyingzi Government of Songshan District in Chifeng City of Inner Mongolia,Chifeng 024000,China;4.Rangeland Office of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau in Wulanchabu City of Inner Mongolia,Wulancabu 012000,China;5.Help-the-Poor Office of Wulanchabu City in Inner Mongolia,Wulanchabu 012000,China.
Abstract:With two methods of sampling,the dominant population biomass,density,height of Bromus inermis were investigated in the different growth stage.The results were different with two methods.The biomass dynamics of Bromus inermis can be correctly studied under same background of height and density with the first method(permanent quadrat method).
Keywords:Sampling method  biomass  Bromus inermis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号