首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

樟子松不同林型沙地土壤肥力的差异
引用本文:苏芳莉,刘明国,韩辉.樟子松不同林型沙地土壤肥力的差异[J].东北林业大学学报,2006,34(6):26-28.
作者姓名:苏芳莉  刘明国  韩辉
作者单位:1. 沈阳农业大学,沈阳,110161
2. 辽宁省固沙造林研究所
基金项目:沈阳农业大学校科研和教改项目;辽宁省水利厅资助项目
摘    要:对辽宁省章古台地区樟子松林沙地土壤的物理性质、养分及微生物状况等进行了研究,并分析了樟子松纯林与不同类型樟子松混交林土壤肥力的差异。选择土壤含水率、体积质量、最大持水量、毛管孔隙度、有机质、全氮、水解氮、全磷、速效磷、速效钾、微生物总量共11个指标,对不同林分类型的土壤效益进行了综合评价。结果显示,混交林土壤肥力均优于纯林。

关 键 词:樟子松  林分类型  土壤肥力  综合评价
收稿时间:2005-10-20
修稿时间:2005-10-20

Differences in Sand Soil between Different Forest Types of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica
Su Fangli,Liu Mingguo,Han Hui.Differences in Sand Soil between Different Forest Types of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2006,34(6):26-28.
Authors:Su Fangli  Liu Mingguo  Han Hui
Institution:Shenyang Agricultural University, Sbenyang 110161, P. R. China; Liaoning Institute of Sand Fixation and Afforestation
Abstract:An experiment was conducted to study the physical property, nutrient content and microorganism of sand soil in Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests in Zhanggutai, Liaoning Province. Differences in soil fertility between the pure forests and different types of mixed forests were analysed. The soil benefits of different forest types were synthetically evaluated by means of 11 factors, namely, soil moisture content, bulk density, the maximum water holding capacity, capillary porosity, quantity of microorganisms, as well as contents of organic matter, total N, hydrolytic N, total P, available P and available K. Result showed that the soil fertility of the mixed forests is better than that of the pure forests.
Keywords:Pinus sylvestris var  mongolica  Forest types  Soil fertility  Synthetic appraisal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号