| 不同运输条件对合浦珠母贝稚贝存活比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓正华,陈明强,李有宁,赵旺,林先鑫,黄桂菊,王雨.不同运输条件对合浦珠母贝稚贝存活比较[J].上海海洋大学学报,2020,29(1):36-44. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓正华 陈明强 李有宁 赵旺 林先鑫 黄桂菊 王雨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所 农业农村部南海渔业资源开发利用重点实验室,广东 广州 510300;三亚热带水产研究院,海南 三亚 572018;中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所 农业农村部南海渔业资源开发利用重点实验室,广东 广州 510300;三亚热带水产研究院,海南 三亚 572018;海南大学 海洋学院,海南 海口 570228;中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所 农业农村部南海渔业资源开发利用重点实验室,广东 广州 510300 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 海南省自然科学基金（319QN338）；广东省渔港建设和渔业发展专项海洋渔业科技推广方向珍珠类项目（B201601-Z02）；海南省重点研发计划项目（ZDYF2016086，ZDYF2017037）；北海市本级科学研究与技术开发项目（北科合201995002） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 比较运输方式及环境温度对合浦珠母贝稚贝运输中的存活影响,从而为稚贝运输过程中的运输方式、环境温度及运输时间的把握提供借鉴和参考。以3月龄稚贝为实验材料,运用无水干露、加水淹没及包装充氧等3种方式,分别在环境温度为5、13、21和29℃下模拟运输。每隔3 h从每组运输条件下取出1组实验贝,转移到正常养殖环境下暂养恢复,经48 h后统计其存活率。对运输时间与存活率之间进行非线性参数曲线拟合,计算每组运输条件下的致死时间(T_0)、半致死时间(T_(0.5))及全致死时间(T_1);运用双因素方差分析,Duncan氏方法比较3种运输方式及4种环境温度间的均值。结果显示:包装充氧优于其他两种运输方式,而加水淹没又优于无水干露;温度为13℃和21℃时优于其他2个环境温度,环境温度为17.60～20.05℃是稚贝运输的最佳温度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 合浦珠母贝 稚贝 运输方式 温度 存活比较 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/12/4 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019/1/28 0:00:00 |
Comparison of survival rates of different transport conditions for Pinctada fucata juveniles |
| |
| DENG Zhenghu,CHEN Mingqiang,LI Youning,ZHAO Wang,LIN Xianxin,HUANG Guiju and WANG Yu.Comparison of survival rates of different transport conditions for Pinctada fucata juveniles[J].Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2020,29(1):36-44. |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Zhenghu CHEN Mingqiang LI Youning ZHAO Wang LIN Xianxin HUANG Guiju and WANG Yu |
| |
| Institution: | Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China,Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China,Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China,Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China,Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China;College of Marine Science, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Hainan, China,Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China and Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation&Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong, China;Sanya Tropical Fisheries Research Institute, Sanya 572018, Hainan, China |
| |
| Abstract: | |
| |
| Keywords: | Pinctada fucata juvenile transport method temperature survival comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《上海海洋大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《上海海洋大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
