首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于主成分分析法的玉米/甘蓝不同套种模式的效益评价
引用本文:李洪,王彧超,王瑞军,郗小倩,张旭丽.基于主成分分析法的玉米/甘蓝不同套种模式的效益评价[J].农学学报,2020,10(5):21-25.
作者姓名:李洪  王彧超  王瑞军  郗小倩  张旭丽
作者单位:山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所,山西大同 037000
基金项目:山西省农业科学院农业科技创新研究课题"高寒区鲜食玉米复播秋白菜高效简化栽培技术研究"(YCX2018423);山西省农业产业发展科技引领工程项目"蔬菜套种高效新模式技术示范"(2019CYYL-15)
摘    要:为了筛选出玉米和甘蓝套种的最佳比例,完善套种栽培技术推广应用的理论依据,根据玉米套种甘蓝的田间试验数据,在进行产量性状和经济效益比较的基础上,采用主成分分析法,对5种套种模式的优劣进行综合评价。结果表明:玉米/甘蓝不同套种模式的综合效益主要由玉米产量性状、甘蓝产量性状和不同套种模式的经济效益3个方面决定;不同套种模式的综合比较结果为处理3>处理1>处理4>处理2>处理5,即:处理3(玉米密度67500株/hm2,甘蓝密度60000株/hm2)套种模式下,玉米、甘蓝的产量分别为12150、80242.5 kg/hm2,总产值为83634.0元/hm2的,效益高于其他处理,田间配置最合理,是最佳组合模式。该研究优化了种植模式,增加单位面积产量和产值,大幅提高农民收入和种植积极性。

关 键 词:套种模式  农艺性状  产量效益  经济效益  主成分分析法  
收稿时间:2019-05-30

Maize/Cabbage Interplanting Modes: Benefit Evaluation Based on Principal Component Analysis
Li Hong,Wang Yuchao,Wang Ruijun,Xi Xiaoqian,Zhang Xuli.Maize/Cabbage Interplanting Modes: Benefit Evaluation Based on Principal Component Analysis[J].Journal of Agriculture,2020,10(5):21-25.
Authors:Li Hong  Wang Yuchao  Wang Ruijun  Xi Xiaoqian  Zhang Xuli
Institution:Institute of the Crops in High Latitude & Cold Climate Area, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Datong 037000, Shanxi, China
Abstract:To screen out the best proportion of maize and cabbage interplanting and improve the theoretical basis of interplanting cultivation technology popularization and application, based on field test data of maize interplanting cabbage, we compared the yield traits and economic benefits, and evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of five interplanting modes by principal component analysis. The results showed that the comprehensive benefits of different maize/cabbage interplanting modes were mainly determined by maize yield traits, cabbage yield traits and economic benefits of different interplanting modes. The comprehensive comparison results of different interplanting modes were as follows: treatment 3 > treatment 1 > treatment 4 > treatment 2 > treatment 5. Under treatment 3 (maize density 67500 plants/hm2, cabbage density 60000 plants/hm2), the yield of maize and cabbage was 12150 and 80242.5 kg/hm2, respectively, and the total output value was 83634.0 yuan/hm2. The benefit was higher than other treatments, and the field configuration was the most reasonable, which was the best combination mode. The study optimized the planting mode, which could increase the yield and output value per unit area, and raise the income of farmers.
Keywords:Interplanting Mode  Agronomic Traits  Yield Benefit  Economic Benefit  Principal Component Analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《农学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《农学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号