|
|||||
|
|
| PRBs与P&T技术处理地下水污染的比较研究 | |
| 引用本文： | 汪水兵,贾永刚,罗先香,方丰华.PRBs与P&T技术处理地下水污染的比较研究[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(13):3142-3145. |
| 作者姓名： | 汪水兵 贾永刚 罗先香 方丰华 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 安徽省环境科学研究院,安徽合肥,230061;中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院,山东青岛,266003 2. 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院,山东青岛,266003 3. 中国人民解放军63883部队,河南洛阳,471000 |
| 基金项目： | 国家科技部国际科技合作重点项目“减轻巢湖富营养化项目”（2005DFA90390）. |
| 摘 要： | 关于地下水污染控制与治理的方法很多,其中抽出-处理技术(P&T)是目前应用最广泛、成熟化程度最高的技术,而渗透反应格栅(PRBs)技术是最新的处理技术,该技术在欧美已得到广泛应用。从不同角度对这2种技术进行比较,并对地下水污染处理时方法选择的影响因素和注意问题等进行研究,旨在说明渗透反应格栅技术在处理地下水污染过程中的重要性,推动该技术在我国的应用与发展,加速我国地下水污染控制与就地修复处理。 |
| 关 键 词： | 抽出-处理 渗透反应格栅(墙) 就地恢复 地下水污染 |
| 文章编号： | 0517-6611（2006）13-3142-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 03 30 2006 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-03-30 |
Comparative Research on In-Situ Treatment Technology of Groundwater with PRBs and P&T |
|
| WANG Shui-bing et al.Comparative Research on In-Situ Treatment Technology of Groundwater with PRBs and P&T[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2006,34(13):3142-3145. | |
| Authors: | WANG Shui-bing |
| Institution: | Anhui Institute of Environmental Science, Hefei, Anhui 230061 |
| Abstract: | Currently many good methods of the control and treatment of groundwater is concerned.The P&T(Pump-and-Treat) technique is the most widely used and mature among them,while the PRBs(Permeable Reactive Barriers) technique is the most advanced treatment technique,which has been widely applied in Europe and US.In this article,the comparisons between the two techniques were made from different angles,and research on the influencing factors and existing problems in choosing methods of groundwater-pollution treatment was carried out.The work was aimed at illustrating the importance of PRB in treatment of groundwater pollution so as to promote its application and development in our country,and hasten control and in situ remediation and treatment of groundwater pollution of our country. |
| Keywords: | Pump-and-Treat Permeable reactive barriers In-Situ remediation Comparative research |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |