首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

准噶尔双峰驼驼乳营养与功能成分与荷斯坦牛乳的差异比较分析
引用本文:宋雯雯,陈卓,李鑫,陈俐静,舒展,李紫仟,郭雪萍,叶倩文,马雪连,苏战强,姚刚.准噶尔双峰驼驼乳营养与功能成分与荷斯坦牛乳的差异比较分析[J].新疆农业科学,2023,60(1):234-241.
作者姓名:宋雯雯  陈卓  李鑫  陈俐静  舒展  李紫仟  郭雪萍  叶倩文  马雪连  苏战强  姚刚
作者单位:1.新疆农业大学动物医学学院,乌鲁木齐 8300522.新疆阿勒泰地区动物疾控中心,新疆阿勒泰 836500
基金项目:自治区重点研发计划(2018B01003-1)
摘    要:【目的】分析比较准噶尔双峰驼乳和荷斯坦牛乳的差异,为研究驼乳的营养价值和生物学功能提供科学基础。【方法】使用乳成分分析仪、电感耦合等离子体光度发射光谱法、气相色谱和ELISA检测乳的主要营养成分、理化特性、脂肪酸和主要生物活性物质含量。【结果】准噶尔双峰驼乳中乳蛋白、乳糖、钙、灰分、干物质显著高于荷斯坦牛乳(P<0.05)。乳密度也显著高于荷斯坦牛乳(P<0.05)。乳脂中花生酸、二十一碳酸、棕榈油酸和α-亚麻酸显著高于荷斯坦牛乳(P<0.05)。而准噶尔双峰驼乳的电导率、酸碱度、水分显著低于荷斯坦牛乳(P<0.05)。顺-8,11,14-二十碳三烯酸、己酸、辛酸、癸酸和月桂酸显著低于荷斯坦牛乳(P<0.05)。但两乳中所检测的生物活性成分含量无显著差异(P> 0.05)。【结论】准噶尔双峰驼乳相较于荷斯坦牛乳存在诸多显著性差异。

关 键 词:准噶尔双峰驼  荷斯坦牛  乳营养成分  乳生物活性物质
收稿时间:2022-04-05

A Comparative Analysis of Milk Nutritional and Functional Components between Junggar Bactrian Camel and Holstein Cow
SONG Wenwen,CHEN Zhuo,LI Xin,CHEN Lijing,SHU Zhan,LI Ziqian,GUO Xueping,YE Qianwen,MA Xuelian,SU Zhanqiang,YAO Gang.A Comparative Analysis of Milk Nutritional and Functional Components between Junggar Bactrian Camel and Holstein Cow[J].Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2023,60(1):234-241.
Authors:SONG Wenwen  CHEN Zhuo  LI Xin  CHEN Lijing  SHU Zhan  LI Ziqian  GUO Xueping  YE Qianwen  MA Xuelian  SU Zhanqiang  YAO Gang
Institution:1. College of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China2. Animal Disease Control and Prevention Center in Altay Prefecture, Altay Xinjiang 836500, China
Abstract:【Objective】 To compare the milk differences between Junggar Bactrian camel and Holstein dairy cow, and to provide a scientific basis for comprehensive understanding of the nutritional value and biological function of camel milk. 【Methods】 Milk composition analyzer, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry, gas chromatography, and ELISA were used to detect the main nutrients, physicochemical characteristics, fatty acids and main bioactive substances content of milk. 【Results】 The contents of milk protein, lactose, calcium, ash, dry matter, density, eicosanoic acid, heneicosylic acid, palmitoleic acid and ALA content in the Junggar Bactrian Camel milk were significantly higher than those in the Holstein dairy cow(P < 0.05).However, conductivity, pH value, water, cis-8, 11, 14-eicosatrienoic acid, caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid content in the Junggar Bactrian Camel were significantly lower than those in the Holstein dairy cow (P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in bioactive substances detected(P > 0.05). 【Conclusion】 There were many significant differences between Junggar Bactrian camel milk and Holstein dairy cow milk.
Keywords:Junggar Bactrian Camel  Holstein dairy cow  milk nutrition component  milk bioactive substance  
点击此处可从《新疆农业科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《新疆农业科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号