首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“互联网+”时代知识产权的司法保护研究
引用本文:徐璟,李胜利.“互联网+”时代知识产权的司法保护研究[J].安徽农业大学学报,2018,27(4):76-80.
作者姓名:徐璟  李胜利
作者单位:安徽农业大学 经济技术学院,安徽大学 法学院
基金项目:安徽省人文社会科学重点项目“进一步完善‘互联网+’战略下知识产权司法保护体系的研究”(SK2018A0716)
摘    要:“互联网+”时代,网络的虚拟性、无国界性加大了打击知识产权侵权的难度。当前,知识产权的司法保护存在若干问题,如司法保护与行政保护冲突、法院级别管辖混乱、司法救济维权成本高、赔偿数额缺乏法律依据等。美、俄、日等国建立的知识产权保护制度在组织架构、审判形式等方面可为我国借鉴。我国应从协调司法保护和行政保护冲突、发挥知识产权专门法院功能以及建立健全相关制度等方面着手,完善知识产权的司法保护。

关 键 词:“互联网+”  知识产权  司法保护

Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property in the Internet Plus Era
XU Jing and Li Shengli.Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property in the Internet Plus Era[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural University,2018,27(4):76-80.
Authors:XU Jing and Li Shengli
Institution:Economic and Technical College of Anhui Agricultural University and Law School, Anhui University
Abstract:In the Internet plus era, virtuality and borderlessness of cyberspace make it more difficult to crack down intellectual property infringement. And judicial protection of intellectual property is also faced with some problems, for instance, contradiction between judicial protection and administrative protection, disorder of subject matter jurisdiction of courts, high cost of judicial relief and protection, lack of legal basis of the amount of compensation, etc. The intellectual property protection system established by America, Russia and Japan can be used for reference by our country, especially its organizational structure and judging form. And our country should set about resolving the contradiction between judicial protection and administrative protection, giving full play to the function of specialized intellectual property court, and establishing and perfecting relevant systems so as to perfect judicial protection.
Keywords:Internet plus  intellectual property  judicial protection
点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《安徽农业大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号