首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析
引用本文:程远,万红建,刘超超,姚祝平,叶青静,李志邈,王荣青,周国治,杨悦俭,陈德梁,阮美颖.十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析[J].浙江农业学报,2018,30(11):1859.
作者姓名:程远  万红建  刘超超  姚祝平  叶青静  李志邈  王荣青  周国治  杨悦俭  陈德梁  阮美颖
作者单位:1.浙江省农业科学院 蔬菜研究所,浙江 杭州 310021;2.江苏科技大学 生物技术学院,江苏 镇江 212018;3.浙江省苍南县农业技术推广中心,浙江 温州 325800
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(31501749,31772294);浙江省农业新品种选育重大科技专项(2016C02051);浙江省育才工程(2018YCGC005);浙江省自然科学基金(LY18C150008);国家重点实验室自主设计创新课题(2017YFD0101902)
摘    要:采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)等技术手段,对目前生产上16个主栽樱桃番茄(Solanum lycopersicum Mill. var. cerasiforme)品种的风味评分及相关指标进行测定和比较分析,解析决定樱桃番茄风味的主要影响因素。研究表明,相比其他风味相关指标,不同番茄品种间柠檬酸、苹果酸、Vc和氨基酸含量的差异较大。16个参试品种中,浙江省农业科学院蔬菜研究所的浙樱粉1号、浙樱黄1号,日本金子种苗株式会社的黄妃,及山东省农业科学院蔬菜研究所的天正红珠风味评分排名前4,以上品种的7项风味及营养决定指标参数(可溶性固形物、总糖、有机酸、果糖、葡萄糖、柠檬酸和Vc)均显著高于风味评价排名后4名的参试番茄品种。进一步的相关性分析结果表明,风味评分与可溶性固形物、总糖、有机酸、果糖、葡萄糖和Vc含量显著正相关,而与糖酸比等复合参数无显著相关性。由上述结果可知,番茄风味品质的主要指标为可溶性固形物、总糖(果糖+葡萄糖)、有机酸(主要是柠檬酸)和Vc。此外,氨基酸作为传统意义上的营养物质,可能与番茄风味存在一定关联。

关 键 词:樱桃番茄  不同品种  风味品质指标  比较分析  相关性分析  
收稿时间:2018-08-22

Comparative analysis of flavor/nutrient determination parameters in 16 different cherry tomato varieties
CHENG Yuan,WAN Hongjian,LIU Chaochao,YAO Zhuping,YE Qingjing,LI Zhimiao,WANG Rongqing,ZHOU Guozhi,YANG Yuejian,CHEN Deliang,RUAN Meiying.Comparative analysis of flavor/nutrient determination parameters in 16 different cherry tomato varieties[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2018,30(11):1859.
Authors:CHENG Yuan  WAN Hongjian  LIU Chaochao  YAO Zhuping  YE Qingjing  LI Zhimiao  WANG Rongqing  ZHOU Guozhi  YANG Yuejian  CHEN Deliang  RUAN Meiying
Institution:1.Institute of Vegetables, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China;
2. Institute of Biotechnology, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212018, China;
3. Cangnan Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Wenzhou 325800, China
Abstract:To elucidate the main factors that affect the flavor of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill. var. cerasiforme), the flavor and nutrient substances were analyzed through technical means as high efficiency liquid chromatography (HPLC) etc. The results showed that the coefficient of variations (CV) of malic acid, citric acid, ascorbic acid (Vc) and total amino acids are relatively higher compared with other flavor determination parameters. Among the 16 tested varieties, Zheyingfen No. 1, Zheyinghuang No. 1 from Vegetable Science Institute of Zhejiang Agricultural Academic Science (ZAAS), Huangfei from Golden Seedling Company of Japan, Tianzhenghongzhu from Vegetable Science Institute of Shandong Agricultural Academic Science (SAAS) were top-ranked in the flavor evaluation, and 7 of their flavor determination parameters (soluble solids, total sugar, organic acid, fructose, glucose, citric acid, and Vc) were significantly higher than those of backward ranked correspondences. Further analysis indicated that the flavor score was positively correlated with parameters including soluble solids, total sugar, organic acid, fructose, glucose, ascorbic acid, but showed no significant correlation with compound parameters such as total sugar/titratable acid etc. Based on the results, we proposed that the main flavor determination parameters should be soluble solids, soluble sugar (fructose+glucose), organic acid (mainly citric acid) and Vc. Additionally, total amino acids, as traditional nutrient components, might also be correlated with tomato flavor.
Keywords:cherry tomato  different varieties  flavor determination parameter  comparative analysis  correlation analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江农业学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江农业学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号