首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

茶园主要害虫种群灯下监测及频振式与LED式杀虫灯的效果评价
引用本文:曾明森,刘丰静,何玉仙,王庆森,吴光远.茶园主要害虫种群灯下监测及频振式与LED式杀虫灯的效果评价[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(19):246-252.
作者姓名:曾明森  刘丰静  何玉仙  王庆森  吴光远
作者单位:1. 福建省农业科学院茶叶研究所,福建福安,355015
2. 福建省农业科学院植物保护研究所,福州,350013
基金项目:福建省科技厅重点项目"茶园有害生物生态调控技术研究",福建省科技厅基本科研专项"福建茶区主要病虫及天敌资源普查与专家识别系统建设" 
摘    要:为了科学利用诱虫灯进行预测预报或诱杀茶树害虫,并为LED杀虫灯的开发利用提供科学依据,进行了测报灯的诱虫试验和不同灯种的对比试验。试验结果表明,虫情测报灯对茶树害虫具有良好的诱集作用,初步明确了白蚁、金龟甲、卷叶蛾类、茶银尺蠖、茶尺蠖、油桐尺蠖、茶斑蛾、茶鹿蛾、茶白纹螟、黑跗眼天牛、茶天牛、红翅天牛等害虫的灯下年消长规律,其中部分害虫的发生规律和世代数与文献记录存在差异。LED红光杀虫灯对昆虫没有诱集作用,蓝光杀虫灯诱虫能力强于紫光杀虫灯,其中,紫光杀虫灯诱集鳞翅目能力强于蓝光杀虫灯,诱集茶树鞘翅目害虫和天敌的能力也强于蓝光杀虫灯,而蓝光杀虫灯诱集半翅目、双翅目、同翅目和蜉蝣目昆虫的能力则比紫光杀虫灯强,频振灯除了诱集中性昆虫(蚊虫和蜉蝣)的能力比蓝光杀虫灯差外,对茶树害虫和天敌的诱集能力均大大优于紫光杀虫灯和蓝光杀虫灯,尤其对天敌有很强的杀伤力。而且,频振灯的诱虫谱比紫光杀虫灯和蓝光杀虫灯更宽。频振式诱虫灯适用于茶树害虫测报,或在成虫发生高峰期诱杀害虫,LED杀虫灯具有开发利用前景。

关 键 词:不同区域    不同区域    花生    管理措施
收稿时间:2010/4/19 0:00:00
修稿时间:6/4/2010 12:00:00 AM

Population Monitoring of the Major Tea Pests under Pest Forecast Lamp and Evaluation of Killing Effects under Frequency Vibrational Lamp and Light Emitting Diode Lamp
Zeng Mingsen,Liu Fengjing,He Yuxian,Wang Qingsen,Wu Guangyuan.Population Monitoring of the Major Tea Pests under Pest Forecast Lamp and Evaluation of Killing Effects under Frequency Vibrational Lamp and Light Emitting Diode Lamp[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2010,26(19):246-252.
Authors:Zeng Mingsen  Liu Fengjing  He Yuxian  Wang Qingsen  Wu Guangyuan
Institution:1 Tea Research Institute,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Fu ' an Fujian 355015; 2 Institute of Plant Protection , Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences , Fuzhou 350013 )
Abstract:To forecast or trap tea pests using light trap scientifically, and provide the scientific basis for development and utilization of LED lights, trapping experiments on pest forecast lamp and comparative tests between frequency vibrational lamp and light emitting diode (LED) lamp were conducted. The intelligent pest forecast lamp showed good performance in trapping tea pests. The population fluctuation of tea pests was initially revealed, such as Isoptera, Scarabaeidae, Tortricidae, Scopula subpunctaria (Herrich Schaeffer), Ectropis oblique Warren, Buzura suppressaria Guenee, Eterusia aedea L., Amata germana Felder, Hymenia recurvalis Fabricius, Chreonoma atritarsis Pic, Aeolestes induta Newman and Erythrus blairi Gressitt, etc. However, the occurrence and generation number of some pests were different from the existing records. Red light emitting diode (LED) lamp showed no effects on trapping insects, and blue LED lamp was more powerful than purple one. The Lepidoptera insects, Coleoptera pests and natural enemies were preferably trapped by violet LED lamp than blue one. On the contrary, blue LED lamp had stronger abilities to trap the pests which belonged to Hemiptera, Diptera, Homoptera and Ephemeroptera. Frequency vibrational lamp was not better at trapping mosquito and ephemera than blue LED lamp, but it showed good abilities to trap tea pests and especially for natural enemies than violet LED lamp and blue LED lamp. Frequency vibrational lamp had the wider spectrum of trapping tea pests than that of violet LED lamp and blue LED lamp. Frequency vibrational lamp was suitable for pest forecast and controlling tea pests at adult occurrence peak. LED light would be more promising prospects in exploitation and utilization.
Keywords:insect light trap  tea pests  spectrum of trapping the insects  population fluctuation  trapping effectiveness evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国农学通报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号