首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

黄土区薄厚层浮土土质道路降雨侵蚀过程差异
引用本文:纪丽静,王文龙,康宏亮,李建明,史倩华,白 芸,聂慧莹,速 欢.黄土区薄厚层浮土土质道路降雨侵蚀过程差异[J].土壤学报,2021,58(1):92-105.
作者姓名:纪丽静  王文龙  康宏亮  李建明  史倩华  白 芸  聂慧莹  速 欢
作者单位:西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点试验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点试验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;长江科学院水土保持研究所, 武汉 430010;榆林学院陕西省陕北矿区生态修复重点实验室, 陕西榆林 719000
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0501604),国家自然科学基金项目(40771127,41761062,41701316);中国科学院重点部署(2+3项目)(02102-A315021615)
摘    要:土质道路经长期碾压产生了大量浮土,加剧了道路侵蚀。本文通过人工模拟降雨试验,研究不同雨强及坡度条件下薄层1.0 cm和厚层4.0 cm浮土土质道路的产流产沙特征。根据侵蚀物质的差异,将浮土道路侵蚀过程分为单独浮土侵蚀阶段和浮土、道路混合侵蚀阶段。结果表明:(1)浮土侵蚀阶段、混合侵蚀阶段薄层浮土平均径流率为厚层浮土的1.01倍~1.52倍、1.26倍~2.44倍。2.5 mm·min–1雨强时3个坡度下的平均次降雨产流量为43.44 L,较1.0~2.0 mm·min-1雨强提高37.36%~82.05%;(2)混合侵蚀阶段16°坡面平均含沙量均值为227.30 g·L-1,为4°和8°的2.14倍和1.37倍。小雨强(1.0、1.5 mm·min-1)时厚层浮土次降雨产沙量为薄层浮土的1.39倍~2.14倍;大雨强(2.0、2.5 mm·min-1)时薄层浮土次降雨产沙量为厚层浮土的1.14倍~1.67倍。1.0 mm·min-1雨强时3个坡度下的平均次降雨产沙量为2.08 kg,占1.5~2.5 mm·min-1雨强的23.57%~68.59%;(3)混合侵蚀阶段及次降雨过程薄层浮土含沙量与径流率相关性较厚层浮土均增强。结果可为黄土区浮土道路侵蚀防治工作的开展提供科学依据。

关 键 词:浮土道路  侵蚀  模拟降雨  产流产沙
收稿时间:2019/8/28 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/10/14 0:00:00

Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of The Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region
JI Lijing,WANG Wenlong,KANG Hongliang,LI Jianming,SHI Qianhu,BAI Yun,NIE Huiying and SU Huan.Rainfall Erosion Process on Earth Road as Affected by Thickness of The Surface Regolith Layer in Loess Region[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2021,58(1):92-105.
Authors:JI Lijing  WANG Wenlong  KANG Hongliang  LI Jianming  SHI Qianhu  BAI Yun  NIE Huiying and SU Huan
Institution:State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateaus, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shannxi 712100, China;State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateaus, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shannxi 712100, China;Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shannxi 712100, China;Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shannxi 712100, China;Department of Soil and Water Conservation, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China;Key Laboratory of Ecological Rehabilitation of Northern Shaanxi Mining Area, Yulin University, Yulin, Shannxi 719000, China
Abstract:Objective] Having long been used for transportation and traffic, earth roads have a regolith layer formed on their surface, which aggravates erosion of the roads. Up to now, very little knowledge is available about how erosion proceeds on the earth roads with a surface regolith layer and how the regolith layer affects erosion of the earth roads.Method] An indoor artificially simulated rainfall experiment was used to investigate characteristics of the runoff and sediment production on roads with a surface regolith layer varying in thickness (thin layer=1.0 cm, and thick layer=4.0 cm). In the experiment a movable hydraulic slope-changeable steel trough, 2m in length, 0.5m in width and 0.55m in height, was used and packed with loess soil to simulate a earth road with a surface regolith layer. The trough was packed first with a layer of loess soil as road, 1.68 g·cm-3 in bulk density, and then with a layer of regolith, 1.20 g·cm-3 in bulk density. The experiment was designed to have 3 levels of slope, 4°, 8° and 16° and 4 levels of intensity, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 mm·min-1. Before each test, a white nylon thread was placed between the road and the regolith layer at the bottom end of the trough, and used to determine sources of the erosive materials by the degree of its exposure. And then the erosion process of the regolith covered road was divided into two stages:1) mere regolith erosion and 2) regolith and road soil mixed erosion.Result] Results show:(1) The mean runoff rate of regolith on the road with a thin layer of regolith was 1.01-1.52 times at the first stage and 1.26-2.44 times at the second stage that on the road with a thick layer of regolith. When the artificial rainfall was set at 2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average runoff yield per rainfall event was 43.44 L from the road regardless of slope degree, and 37.36%-82.05% higher than that when the rainfall was 1.0-2.0 mm·min-1 in intensity; (2) During the second stage erosion, the average sediment concentration was 227.30 g·L-1 on the road 16° in slope, and about 2.14 times and 1.37 times that on the road 4° in slope and 8° in slope, respectively. Under rainfalls low in intensity (1.0 and 1.5 mm·min-1), sediment yield per rainfall event was high on the road with a thick regolith layer, being about 1.39-2.14 times that on the road with a thin regolith layer; whereas under rainfalls high in intensity (2.0, 2.5 mm·min-1), it was high on the road with a thin regolith layer, being about 1.14-1.67 times that on the road with a thick regolith layer. And under rainfalls 1.0 mm·min-1 in intensity, the average sediment yield per rainfall event on roads regardless of slope degree was 2.08 kg, which equaled to 23.57%-68.59% of that under rainfalls 1.5-2.5 mm·min-1 in intensity; (3) During the second stage erosion and the entire course of a rainfall event, sediment concentration in the runoff was more closely related to runoff rate on the road with a thin regolith layer than on the one with a thick regolith layer.Conclusion] All the findings in this study may serve as a scientific basis for prevention and control of erosion on regolith-covered earth road erosion in the Loess areas.
Keywords:Regolith-covered earth road  Erosion  Simulated rainfall  Runoff and sediment generation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《土壤学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《土壤学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号