首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同草带覆盖位置条件下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性
引用本文:宇涛,张霞,李占斌,李鹏,李聪.不同草带覆盖位置条件下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(6):22-27,122.
作者姓名:宇涛  张霞  李占斌  李鹏  李聪
作者单位:1. 省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室(西安理工大学), 西安 710048;2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西 杨凌 712100;3. 河南黄河水文勘测设计院, 郑州 450004
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目"基于能量过程的坡沟系统侵蚀产沙过程调控与模拟"(41471226),"黄土高原生态建设的生态-水文过程响应机理研究"(41330858)
摘    要:以坡沟系统单元为研究对象,利用室内降雨试验,结合三维激光扫描和微地貌分析技术,研究不同草带覆盖位置下坡沟系统侵蚀产沙差异性。结果表明:一些布设在合适位置的草带能够在p0.05水平上显著影响坡沟系统的径流量和产沙量。植被布设于坡面中下部比布设于坡面上部具有更好的水沙调控作用,植被布设于坡面长度60%时,径流量和产沙量分别减少7.35%和62.93%,直接拦沙功效优于蓄水减沙功效,水土保持功效达到最优。植被布设于坡面下部时,其侵蚀输沙过程的剧烈程度得到了缓解,植被调控侵蚀发育的作用体现。植被布设于坡面中下部时,下垫面仅有52%的区域发生侵蚀,其侵蚀输沙过程的剧烈程度明显减少,植被调控侵蚀作用有效限制了侵蚀发育。植被布设于坡面中部和中上部时,加剧了侵蚀的发育程度。研究结果有助于更好地理解植被优化配置。

关 键 词:草带覆盖位置  坡沟系统  侵蚀产沙差异  水土保持功效
收稿时间:2018/6/11 0:00:00

Study on Difference of Erosion Sediment In a Slope-gully System Under Different Grass Strip Position
YU Tao,ZHANG Xi,LI Zhanbin,LI Peng,LI Cong.Study on Difference of Erosion Sediment In a Slope-gully System Under Different Grass Strip Position[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,32(6):22-27,122.
Authors:YU Tao  ZHANG Xi  LI Zhanbin  LI Peng  LI Cong
Institution:1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of China(Xi''an University of Technology), Xi''an 710048;2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dry-land Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100;3. Henan Yellow River Hydrological Survey and Design Institute, Zhengzhou 450004
Abstract:In this study, the unit slope-gully system was used as the object, using indoor simulated rainfall experiments, combined with three-dimensional laser scanning technology and micro topography analysis technology, the difference of erosion sediment under different grasss trip position was studied.The results showed that some rational grass strips(p<0.05) influenced both runoff and sediment yield in the slope-gully system. The regulation functions on runoff and sediment with the grass strip on the middle lower part of the slope were generally clearer than those with grass on the upper part of the slope. The optimal position for grass strips in the slope-gully system was identified as 60% of the slope length. In this location, the grass strips could effectively reduce the runoff and sediment by 7.35% and 62.93%, respectively. The water storage function of the grass strip was weak; however, its direct sediment interception function was more effective, the water and soil conservation function was optimal.When grass strip was planted in the lower part of the slope, the severity of erosion sediment transport processes was eased, and the effect of grass strip on erosion was reflected.When grass strip was planted in the middle lower part of the slope, only 52% of the underlying surface was eroded,the severity of erosion sediment transport processes was eased significantly, the regulation of vegetatione ectively controlled the erosion formation and development.When grass strip was planted in the middle part and middle upper part of the slope, extremely aggravated erosion development.The information of this study can be useful for better understanding the optimal vegetation pattern.
Keywords:grass strip position  slope-gully system  erosion sediment difference  water and soil conversation function
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水土保持学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号