| Abstract: | The pseudo cross‐variogram can be used for cokriging two or more soil properties when few or none of the sampling locations have values recorded for all of them. The usual estimator of the pseudo cross‐variogram is susceptible to the effects of extreme data (outliers). This will lead to overestimation of the error variance of predictions obtained by cokriging. A solution to this problem is to use robust estimators of the pseudo cross‐variogram, and three such estimators are proposed in this paper. The robust estimators were demonstrated on simulated data in the presence of different numbers of outlying data drawn from different contaminating distributions. The robust estimators were less sensitive to the outliers than the non‐robust one, but they had larger variances. Outliers tend to obscure the spatial structure of the cross‐correlation of the simulated variables as described by the non‐robust estimator. The several estimators of the pseudo cross‐variogram were applied to a multitemporal data set on soil water content. Since these were obtained non‐destructively, direct measurements of temporal change can be made. A prediction subset of the data was subsampled as if obtained by destructive analysis and the remainder used for validation. Estimators of the auto‐variogram and pseudo cross‐variogram were applied to the prediction data, then used to predict the change in water content at the validation sites by cokriging. The estimation variances of these predictions were best calculated with a robustly estimated model of coregionalization, although the validation set was too small to conclude that the non‐robust estimators were unsuitable in this instance. |
