四川省土地整理项目绩效评价

土地整理绩效评价是提升土地整理成效的关键环节,构建一种适用于四川省不同整治方向土地整理项目的评价体系,选择合适的评价方法,对于土地整理项目验收、指导实践活动具有重要意义。本文从四川省五大土地整治工程类型区中的4个重点项目区中,选取典型土地整理项目,运用IPOE评价框架,从投入、过程、产出、结果 4个维度入手,建立评价体系,采用熵权法确定指标权重,运用物元分析法建立物元评价模型对土地整理项目进行绩效评价。结果表明:1)分属4个不同类型区的苍溪县、洪雅县、古蔺县和盐源县的土地整理项目的绩效水平分别为:优秀、优秀、优秀、较差,对应等级的综合关联度为:0.214 0、0.316 4、0.401 8、?1.914 9。2)运用逻辑模型评价框架,建立评价指标体系,符合综合绩效理念,有利于全面科学地进行土地整理绩效评价;物元分析法适用于不同整治方向的土地整理项目绩效评价,简单全面而且能够体现不同整治重点的分异信息。在此基础上对四川省土地整理项目的绩效评价较符合项目实际,具有一定适宜性。3)四川省土地整理项目开展取得一定成效,但仍需从宏、微观两方面入手,继续提高土地整理项目的绩效水平。

Evaluation of performance of land consolidation projects in Sichuan Province

As performance evaluation is critical for improving land consolidation projects, it is vital to construct and choose an evaluation system suitable for different land consolidation projects. Based on the 2011?2015 Land Consolidation Plan in Sichuan Province, this paper selected 4 typical land consolidation projects in 4 counties (Cangxi County, Hongya County, Gulin County and Yanyuan County) of the province and used the IPOE (input, process, output, effect) evaluation framework to build an evaluation system. The paper then used the entropy weight method to verify the index weight and matter-element method to establish the matter-element evaluation model used to evaluate the performance of the land consolidation project. The results showed that: 1) the performance levels (correlation degrees) of the land consolidation projects in Cangxi County, Hongya County, Gulin County and Yanyuan County were respectively graded as excellent (0.214 0), excellent (0.316 4), excellent (0.401 8) and poor ( 1.914 9). 2) The logical model used in the evaluation framework to establish the evaluation index system was consistent with the concept of comprehensive performance and thus conducive for comprehensive evaluation of land consolidation projects performance. Thus the matter-element analysis was suitable for evaluation of the performance of different land consolidation projects. On this basis, the evaluation of the performance of land consolidation projects in Sichuan was to some extent practical and suitable. 3) Although the land consolidation projects in Sichuan Province had achieved significant results, there was still need to strengthen macro and micro bases of the project. This required shifting from capital investment and organizational management to scientific development suitable for construction designs. At the same time, there was the need to strengthen system construction in order to ensure the completion of the land consolidation projects in timely, qualitative and quantitative manner. More scientific, environmentally-friendly and resource-saving construction design and process could significantly improve the performance of project construction. Furthermore, the suitable scale of management of agricultural lands after consolidation and the development characteristic of agriculture were possible ways of increasing agricultural income to ensure greater public satisfaction. It was only by the above measures that the performance of the land consolidation projects could be improved.