Comparison of field and laboratory measurement of denitrification and N2O production in the saturated zone of hydromorphic soils

We evaluated a new method to measure in situ denitrification under field conditions in a number of water-saturated subsoils that had a broad range of biogeochemical properties. A test solution containing ¹⁵NO₃⁻ and/or C₂H₂ was introduced to the subsoil and the subsequent production of dissolved denitrification products was measured to quantify denitrification activity. The method showed a clear production of denitrification products over time. Results were compared to laboratory-based measurements from the same soil incubated as anaerobic slurries with added ¹⁵NO₃⁻. Rates of denitrification with the in situ and the laboratory methods ranged from 1-2800 and 1-1700 μg N kg⁻¹ d⁻¹, respectively. Generally the methods gave good agreement and we consider both to be valid. However, there were some significant deviations, which we attribute to spatial heterogeneity and laboratory effects. Because the laboratory method is so much easier to perform, we suggest it should be the preferred method for large-scale studies of denitrification from the soil types we investigated. However, the two methods showed poor agreement in determining the proportion of N₂O in the total denitrification output. This was because this proportion is subject to delicate and complex control. We conclude that neither method was suitable for quantifying N₂O emission from the denitrification measurements.