首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

鄱阳湖地区长期施肥双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应及收益评估
引用本文:余喜初,李大明,黄庆海,喻耀民,熊军,胡惠文,徐小林,陈明.鄱阳湖地区长期施肥双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应及收益评估[J].农业环境保护,2011(9):1777-1782.
作者姓名:余喜初  李大明  黄庆海  喻耀民  熊军  胡惠文  徐小林  陈明
作者单位:[1]江西省红壤研究所农业部鄱阳湖区红壤耕地质量与环境重点野外科学观测站,南昌331717 [2]江西省永修县农业局,江西九江330300
基金项目:公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费(201003016);农业部开放基金资助
摘    要:以江西省红壤所长期施肥红壤水稻土双季稻农田生态系统为研究对象,利用不同施肥处理作物产量及土壤有机质含量等测定数据结合调查获得的生态系统物质和管理投入资料,估算了不同施肥处理(不施肥(CK)、单施氮肥(N)、单施磷肥(P)、单施钾肥(K)、氮磷肥配施(NP)、氮钾肥配施(NK)、氮磷钾配施(NPK)、两倍氮磷钾配施(2NPK)、有机肥与氮磷钾肥配施(NPKM))双季稻生态系统的碳汇效应和经济效益。结果表明,有机肥和化肥配施(NPKM)既提高了系统的作物固碳量又显著增加了土壤的固碳量,使得其净碳汇效应最大,为8.78tC·hm^-2·a^-1;两倍氮磷钾配施(2NPK)系统的净碳汇效应为8.11tC·hm^-2·a^-1,二者均高于氮磷钾配施(NPK)处理的7.03tC·hm^-2·a^-1,不施肥及单施一种或两种无机肥配施系统的净碳汇效应均明显减弱,其中不施肥处理(CK)最小为4.52tC·hm^-2·a^-1,单施N肥比单施P、K肥在提高系统净碳汇效应上作用明显。配施有机肥(NPKM)稻田的作物产量和经济效益也高于无机肥配施处理(NPK和2NPK),不施肥、单施一种或两种无机肥配施稻田的作物产量和经济效益明显偏低。因此,稻田施用一定量的无机肥是提高稻田生态系统碳汇效应和经济效益的保证,而配施有机肥可以明显提高稻田生态系统的碳汇效应和经济效益。

关 键 词:长期施肥  双季稻农田生态系统  净碳汇效应  经济效益

Net Carbon Sink Effects and Economic Benefits in Double Rice Ecosystem Under Long-term Fertilization in Poyang Lake Region
YU Xi-chu,LI Da-ming,HUANG Qing-hai,YU Yao-min,XIONG Jun,HU Hui-wen,XU Xiao-lin,CHEN Ming.Net Carbon Sink Effects and Economic Benefits in Double Rice Ecosystem Under Long-term Fertilization in Poyang Lake Region[J].Agro-Environmental Protection,2011(9):1777-1782.
Authors:YU Xi-chu  LI Da-ming  HUANG Qing-hai  YU Yao-min  XIONG Jun  HU Hui-wen  XU Xiao-lin  CHEN Ming
Institution:1.Poyang Lake Field Reddish Paddy Soil Pivotal Observational and Experimental Station of Agricultural Ministry, Research Institute of Red Soil of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 331717, China; 2.Bureau of Agriculture of Yongxiu, Jiujiang 330300, China)
Abstract:The net carbon sink and economic benefits of double rice cropping ecosystem under long-term fertilization were estimated based on the measurement of rice yield, soil organic matter content and the investigation of material and management inputs, in Poyang Lake Field Reddish Paddy Soil Pivotal Observational and Experimental Station of Agricultural Ministry. The treatments includes: no fertilization(CK); single N(N); single P(P); single K(K); combined N and P(NP); combined N and K(NK); combined N, P and K(NPK); double combined N, P and K(2NPK) and combined inorganic/organic fertilization (NPKM). The carbon sequestration from crop and soil increased under combined inorganic/organic fertilization(NPKM) compared to that under inorganic fertilization only(NPK). Increased inorganic fertilization (2NPK) did not improve ecosystem net carbon sink significantly. The net carbon sinks of NPK, 2NPK and NPKM were 7.03 t C·hm^-2·a^-1, 8.11 t C·hm^-2·a^-1 and 8,78 tC·hm^-2·a^-1, respectively. It reduced ecosystem carbon sink signifieantly under lower fertilization level and no fertilization ecosystem, the net carbon sink was 4.52 t C·hm^-2·a^-1under no fertilization(CK) ecosystem and it is the lowest in all the treatments. The difference of the economic benefits under different treatments was almost the same as that of ecosystem net carbon sink. The N fertilizer is better than P and K fertilizer on improving paddy field ecosystem net carbon sink and economic benefits in Poyang Lake region. The application of organic fertilizer besides inorganic fertilizer could increase both ecosystem net carbon sink and economic benefits; no fertilization and less fertilization reduced the ecosystem net carbon sink and economic benefits significantly. So, the proper inorganic fertilizer application is necessary to keep higher crop yield and improve ecosystem net carbonsink, the application of organic fertilizer besides inorganic fertilizer is an effective method to achieve the objective of the lower carbon and high quality agriculture.
Keywords:long-term fertilization  double rice cropping ecosystem  net carbon sink  economic benefits
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号