| 京郊河溪岸边带生态恢复适宜性评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冯泽深,高甲荣,娄会品,赵哲光,杨海龙,王颖.京郊河溪岸边带生态恢复适宜性评价[J].水土保持通报,2010,30(2):46-50. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冯泽深 高甲荣 娄会品 赵哲光 杨海龙 王颖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京林业大学,教育部水土保持与荒漠化防治重点实验室,北京,100083 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目，国际科技合作项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 运用模糊概率评价模型,构建岸边带生态恢复适宜性评价指标体系,对北京郊区安达木河岸边带进行了生态恢复适宜性评价,并将适宜性分为:完全不适宜(Ⅰ),低度适宜(Ⅱ),适宜(Ⅲ),非常适宜(Ⅳ)共4个等级.结果表明,安达木河岸边带生态恢复适宜性总体处于Ⅱ和Ⅲ等级之间的过渡阶段,各等级岸边带所占比例分别为10.0%,30.6%,26.7%和11.7%.并在分析安达木河生态恢复适宜性评价图的基础上,针对处于不同适宜性等级的岸边带提出了相应的生态恢复建议.
|
| 关 键 词： | 岸边带 生态恢复 适宜性评价 安达木河 |
| 收稿时间： | 8/7/2009 12:00:00 AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2009/11/27 0:00:00 |
Suitability Assessment for Ecological Restoration of Rural Riparian Zone in Beijing City |
| |
| FENG Ze-shen,GAO Jia-rong,LOU Hui-pin,ZHAO Zhe-guang,YANG Hai-long and WANG Ying.Suitability Assessment for Ecological Restoration of Rural Riparian Zone in Beijing City[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2010,30(2):46-50. |
| |
| Authors: | FENG Ze-shen GAO Jia-rong LOU Hui-pin ZHAO Zhe-guang YANG Hai-long and WANG Ying |
| |
| Institution: | The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;The Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China |
| |
| Abstract: | By means of fuzzy probability assessment model,an assessment indicator system was built to assess the suitability for ecological restoration of Andamu River. The suitability for ecological restoration was divided into four grades:not suitable,low suitability,suitable,and very suitable. Results showed that the total suitability for ecological restoration of Andamu River was between the low suitability and the suitable grade. The proportion of four grades that various types of riparian take up was 10.0%,30.6%,26.7%,and 11.7%,respectively. On the base of subsection assessment sketch of riparian zone ecological restoration suitability,ecological restoration suggestions for each grade of riparian zone were brought forward. |
| |
| Keywords: | riparian zone ecological restoration suitability assessment Andamu River |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《水土保持通报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《水土保持通报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
